Skip to content or view screen version

London terror bombings: a political crime

WSWS | 09.07.2005 00:11 | G8 2005 | Anti-militarism | Anti-racism | Repression | Terror War | London | World

The criminal nature of these outrages is underscored by the fact that they occurred in a city that has been the scene of innumerable protests against imperialism and war. In February 2003, more than 1 million people marched in London to oppose the plans of the US and Britain to invade Iraq.

NO MORE WAR!
NO MORE WAR!


The World Socialist Web Site unreservedly condemns the terror bombings in London that have claimed dozens of lives and injured hundreds more. We send our deepest condolences to the families of those who perished and those who were injured, and all those who have been shocked and traumatised by what they experienced.

Once again, the world is witnessing horrific scenes of death, injury and suffering sustained by people who bear no responsibility for the crimes committed by their governments. The bombs were timed to go off at rush hour in order to kill and maim the maximum number of people as they travelled to work, took their children to school or went sight-seeing.

The final toll of dead and injured is not yet known, but the estimates continue to climb.

Beginning at 8:51 a.m. on July 7, four bombs detonated in rapid succession. Three devices exploded on the London Underground and one on a packed double-decker bus. Trains travelling between Aldgate and Liverpool Street, Russell Square and King's Cross and one parked at Edgware tube station were hit. The top deck of a bus carrying passengers from Hackney to Marble Arch was torn off.

According to official sources, 35 people were killed in the Underground, two died in the bus bombing, and one victim died in hospital as a result of injuries sustained in the blast. At least 700 have been injured, 45 of these seriously. A number have lost limbs and others are badly burnt.

US officials have said that British police discovered two unexploded bombs following the four blasts.

The criminal nature of these outrages is underscored by the fact that they occurred in a city that has been the scene of innumerable protests against imperialism and war. In February 2003, more than 1 million people marched in London to oppose the plans of the US and Britain to invade Iraq.

If it is to emerge that the bombings were carried out by an Islamic terrorist organisation, it would provide further bloody evidence of the reactionary and politically bankrupt character of such groups. Terrorism does not hinder imperialism. Rather, it spreads fear, anger, confusion and political disorientation--all of which play into the hands of the political elites in London and Washington and their pliant media.

However, at this point it is not possible to accurately determine who carried out these attacks. A group calling itself "The Secret Organisation of Al Qaeda in Europe" has claimed responsibility on an Islamic web site, saying the blasts were in retaliation for British involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan. But the group has never been heard of before, and some experts have questioned the authenticity of the posting.

The lack of information has not stopped British Prime Minister Tony Blair, US President George Bush and the other heads of state meeting for the G8 summit in Scotland from seizing on the atrocities in an attempt to justify their policy of war and attacks on democratic rights.

Speaking from the opulent surroundings of Gleneagles, Blair and Bush could not wait to utilise the bombings for their own ends. Blair barely paused to acknowledge the victims and the anguish of their families before insisting that the G8 summit would continue. According to Blair, the bombings were "particularly barbaric" because they "happened on a day when people are meeting to try to help the problems of poverty in Africa, and the long-term problems of climate change and the environment."

Bush also stressed what he claimed to be the distinction between the evil of the terrorists and the G8 leaders "working to alleviate poverty, to help the world to rid the pandemic of AIDS [sic], and ways to have a clean environment."

"The contrast couldn't be clearer between the intentions and the hearts of those of us who care deeply about human rights and human liberty and those who kill, those who have such evil in their heart that they will take the lives of innocent folks," he continued, before declaring that "The war on terror goes on."

The G8 also issued an official communique insisting that the assembled head of state would "continue our deliberations in the interests of a better world... Here at this Summit, the world's leaders are striving to combat world poverty and save and improve human life."

These statements were immediately taken up by the international media and regurgitated ad nauseam.

At a time when scores of people were grievously wounded and families were receiving the terrible news of the deaths of loved ones, the last thing anyone needed to hear were the self-serving platitudes of the master cynics and hypocrites of the G8.

 http://www.wsws.org/

Related:

Socialist condemn London atrocities

The Socialist Alliance condemns outright the horrific bombings in London yesterday and expresses our solidarity with all the victims and their families and friends.

More:  http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/07/93463.php

Stattfor prime suspect in London Bombing

In the long tradition of news leaks, the latest results of my investigation of the London bombings as I work backwards in time to get a positive ID lock on an exact asshole.

More:  http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/07/93422.php

Who did the London Bombings?

Osama Bin Laden strikes again...

More:  http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/07/93418.php

Where the bombers struck

It took about 30 minutes for the survivors to make it to the surface. "People were coming out covered in black soot, blood and grease. There was people lying at the side of the station on plastic sheeting," said Kabin Chibber, 24, who works in the Dow Jones building above Aldgate station.

More:  http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/07/93423.php

Crush, Kill, Destroy, Labor Wants War on Afghanistan

Labor's Pre-emptive war spokesman, robert mcClelland, says Australia needs to redeploy troops to Afghanistan after an attack today against a US helicopter left 17 missing.

But what about the attacks on Afghanistan? About 465 suspected freedom fighters have been reported killed since March, after snows melted on mountain trails used by the resistance. In the same period, 29 U.S. occupiers, 38 US/Afghan police and militants and 125 civilians have been killed.

More:  http://www.geocities.com/publik15/archive05/2005b96.html

Zarqawi: Everywhere and nowhere

Afghanistan, but that he doesn't believe he is in Iraq. Along with others in the neighborhood, he is convinced that Zarqawi was killed in the Tora Bora region of Afghanistan during the US bombings that resulted from the attacks of September 11.

More:  http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/07/93419.php

Searching for resistance in Afghanistan

After the assassination plot against U.S. Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad was revealed to Kabul officials, spokesman Jawed Ludin said, "Our people are dying, our schools are getting burned, our mosques are getting blown up, and our clergy are getting assassinated."

More:  http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/06/92992.php

Howard off to US, UK - part 5

But what does it matter the first time or the second time "since the illegal and degrading war on Iraq"? Incidentally, a war, that killed, maimed and injured over 100,000 innocent men, women and children? It only matters I suppose to get the second part of the paragraph into this article.

More:  http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/06/92954.php











WSWS
- e-mail: gkable@hotmail.com
- Homepage: http://www.geocities.com/publik15/news1

Comments

Hide the following comment

sadly it is not a political crime

09.07.2005 15:08

political crime has been defined
_de jure_ & _de facto_ tragically so
in the recent histories of several of Europe's states.
the UK, Ireland, Spain, France, Italy, Netherlands, Sweden,
Germany, Portugal, the list goes on.

We are all anti-iraq war. that is politics.
many of us were anti that war for its illegality. that is international law.
The bombings do not alter that, add to it or detract from it.
And it is cheap, to attempt to make political points on these acts,
especially as those who have attacked you have _no_ political agenda.
There is no dialogue nor hope for dialogue.
So many people who are used to (in the western liberal and tolerant tradition)
responding to daily events in local or national or geopolitics in a political way,
rationalise the events according to their political stance.

But that is un-neccesary and poorly serves the victims.
those who died, those who were wounded, those who were traumatised by the acts.
Here (im in barcelona) the right wing yet again wheel out cheap political points,
as cheap as those we have seen in the "neo-con" US reaction.
Aznar just declaring a withdrawl from Iraq would be a victory for the terrorists.
That disgusts me, and i am equally disgusted by the cheap political points made on the
left. Our campaign against the occupation of Iraq is not an issue of terror.
It is an issue of humanity, of pacifism.
We call for the withdrawl from Iraq for the Iraqi people.
& thereafter we will call for peace in Iraq.
These are complex issues, don't react politically to something which demands
an emotional response.

Thus-
Remember the Victims. the dead, the wounded, the families, those who now
approach silent and forgotten insanities for the infernal lottery.

When that is done, Politics comes back.

ipsiphi - in barcelona