If the brit government really took the terrorists threats seriously..
hacked off in hackney | 08.07.2005 22:44 | Terror War
If the brit government really believed and took al-ciaeda threats seriously.
Knowing the fact that they were dealing with rich ruthless disassociated cold blooded killers (trained by our own ruthless dissociated psychopaths at CIA black ops in Afghanistan in the 1980's, programmed and trained to kill and maim Russian soldiers mercilessly).
The security services should have put in place, body frisking and bag searching check points at the entrance of London tubes and on entering buses a long time ago.
Knowing the fact that they were dealing with rich ruthless disassociated cold blooded killers (trained by our own ruthless dissociated psychopaths at CIA black ops in Afghanistan in the 1980's, programmed and trained to kill and maim Russian soldiers mercilessly).
The security services should have put in place, body frisking and bag searching check points at the entrance of London tubes and on entering buses a long time ago.
Al-ciaeda are not like republicans and other guerilla groups who ALWAYS phone in prior warnings of bombs, and give the authorities time to evacuate buildings etc.
Why are the british government so complacent and so matter of fact about mass civillian casualities and fatalities?
If no warning bombs were going off in Belfast, body frisking and bag searching would still be in place at security barriers at city centre entrances and at the entrances of shops.
It's time they introduced routine body frisking and bag searching in London, it doesn't cost much money and there's no need to use expensive equipment, it also doesn't infringe on civil liberties or human rights. We had body frisking and bag searching in Belfast for 20 years, which was carried out by private security firms, there was very little aggro.
Given the so called intelligence about the nature and danger of al-ciaeda terrorists, why were the majority of the Met/MI5/MI6 pulled out of London, and relocated to Gleneagles to protect 8 rich people, leaving 3 million ordinary people in London unprotected.
Afterall whats 700 injured londoners and upwards of 50 ordinary people dead, compared to the safety of 8 of the richest people on the planet.
Are Londoners expected to swallow Tony's comforting words hook,line and sinker, and just sit back and hope for the best?
Is relying on just hoping to not to get caught up in a no warning bomb on the ungerground/buses, effective security and protection?
The brit government doesn't have to spend millions on intricate, complex intelligence survailence etc, all it has to do is put in place body frisking and bag searches at entrances to the tubes.
Is it mass stupidity for Londoners to settle for Tony's stiff upper lip bollocks and his 'we won't change our way of life' or in other words, we don't want to spend any more money on simple basic security measures.
The british government can spend millions of tax payers money on war in Iraq, yet it won't implement basic, simple security measures for its own people.
Why are the british government so complacent and so matter of fact about mass civillian casualities and fatalities?
If no warning bombs were going off in Belfast, body frisking and bag searching would still be in place at security barriers at city centre entrances and at the entrances of shops.
It's time they introduced routine body frisking and bag searching in London, it doesn't cost much money and there's no need to use expensive equipment, it also doesn't infringe on civil liberties or human rights. We had body frisking and bag searching in Belfast for 20 years, which was carried out by private security firms, there was very little aggro.
Given the so called intelligence about the nature and danger of al-ciaeda terrorists, why were the majority of the Met/MI5/MI6 pulled out of London, and relocated to Gleneagles to protect 8 rich people, leaving 3 million ordinary people in London unprotected.
Afterall whats 700 injured londoners and upwards of 50 ordinary people dead, compared to the safety of 8 of the richest people on the planet.
Are Londoners expected to swallow Tony's comforting words hook,line and sinker, and just sit back and hope for the best?
Is relying on just hoping to not to get caught up in a no warning bomb on the ungerground/buses, effective security and protection?
The brit government doesn't have to spend millions on intricate, complex intelligence survailence etc, all it has to do is put in place body frisking and bag searches at entrances to the tubes.
Is it mass stupidity for Londoners to settle for Tony's stiff upper lip bollocks and his 'we won't change our way of life' or in other words, we don't want to spend any more money on simple basic security measures.
The british government can spend millions of tax payers money on war in Iraq, yet it won't implement basic, simple security measures for its own people.
hacked off in hackney
Comments
Hide the following 6 comments
try islington, try granita, try anything
08.07.2005 23:24
der naaaasty terrorists are attacking
please put a tag on me
its for my own safety
i'll promise i'll behave myself
and act the way you want me to
as long as you don't arrest me, that's OK by me...
cos i just can't trust no on no more
and the new says thats the truth
pleeese
as im
trundling off to work
5 days a week
in a socially engineered
city of power slavery
of wages paying for
gadgets
enforced upgrades
status
debt
slavery
round and round we go
ever get the feeling your living in a timeloop?
ITS FUCKING 1933 ALL OVER
WELCOME BACK TO DER REICH
THE ONE DRESSED WITH BONOS SMILE
REASSURING INNIT?
PAUL C, CAPTAIN WARDROBE, ANTI NAZI
Capt Wardrobe/Paul C even ..
09.07.2005 00:28
Anyway'z .. 'I want to order a brand new world with fresh unpolluted seas not forgetting a sprinkle of libertarian happiness and a generous helping of tasty anarchist sauce followed by an untouched wilderness - wild and free.'
OK ,YOU UNDERSTAND? BLAIR/BU$H and you other six PRICKS.
FUCK AUTHORITY/RELIGION!!! THIS IS OUR WORLD!!!! HOW DARE YOU TRY AND FUCK WITH IT YOU AUTHORITARIAN SCUMFUCKS THE LOT OF YOU - CURSE AND HEX YOU FUCKERS!!!!
Your recipe is one of endless calamity and disaster as you struggle for power and control ... Our recipe is the brand new flavour, when tasted, will envelope and entice every being on the planet. The realisation that everyone is a free entity responible for their own actions and answerable to NO ONE. No God No Master.
YOUR DAYS OF GOVERNANCE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN NUMBERED. PREPARE.
Sym-but-not-Pathetik
G8 protests and london bombings
09.07.2005 09:37
I have to make this point somewhere so here goes. The press has had a good old time slagging off the protesters at G8 in Scotland but why were we there. We were there to object to the policies and actions of our leaders and rulers which piss some people off so severely that they bomb us to try and get a change of policy and sting us back for all the shit we're dumping on them. I don't think anyone at the G8 Dissent supports these bombers but our aims are not totally dissimilar. The message is stop screwing up the life and culture of other societies. Be fair with us and we'll be fair with you.
Matt
note to self, be silly
09.07.2005 11:08
better not be weird ....eh
might be offensive or imaginative
blimey
can't have that...can we?
must bring the thread back to the G8
must bring the thread back to the G8
must bring the thread back to the G8
must bring the thread back to the G8
----------------------------------------------
"I AM A ROBOT"
"I AM A ROBOT"
"BACK TO G8"
OBEY!
OBEY!
DON'T THINK IN LARGER TERMS
OBEY!
JOIN DISSENT
JOIN RISE-UP
OBEY!
OBEY!
----------------------------------------------
YOUR TIME IS THROUGH
NOW ITS TIME FOR PEOPLE TO WAKE
UP AND STOP BEING STEERED
DO YOUR DISSENTING ON YOUR OWN
OR IN SMALL CELLS
MAKE IT AS SPONTANEOUS AS YOU CAN
LOOK THE WAY YOU WANT TO
FUCK THE STEREOTYPE
BREAK FREE
FUCK THE PUBLIC SCHOOL
FAKE ANARCHISTS
NO LEADERS
paul c
privacy
09.07.2005 12:31
Err... It is infringement of privacy to be frisked randomly. Also, a private firm would not be able to do it as they are not part of the government - it would have to be the police.
The laws in place at present are good enough to protect people, they just need to be used properly. Instead of targetting protesters all the time, they should use the money to stop terror.
Also, if the government didn't partake in a campaign of bombing countries for reasons unknown (the reasons they tell us are not legitimate) then we would be much safer - as the opposing groups would not feel the need to retaliate.
fredrico
e-mail: musteatvegan@yahoo.co.uk
the diversity of London doesn't allow for touching strangers.
09.07.2005 14:59
you posted this article to ireland indymedia as well, (glad you did)
I've left two quite detailed comments there.
you can read them at link -
Just one thing, the cultural diversity of London doesn't allow for touching
strangers.
I've explained some of the problems to such solutions here-
http://www.indymedia.ie/newswire.php?story_id=70741
ipsiphi - in barcelona