Skip to content or view screen version

Galloway Wary Of Staged Terror Attack As Pretext For Iran Invasion

cascadian | 07.07.2005 18:39 | Terror War

prisonplanet.com/articles/june2005/010605gallowaywary.htm

Galloway Wary Of Staged Terror Attack As Pretext For Iran Invasion

Prison Planet | June 1 2005

George Galloway made worldwide headlines on May 17th when he appeared in front of a Senate committee on investigations, after its members accused him of profiteering from Saddam Hussein's regime by receiving vouchers for oil, despite the fact that such allegations against Galloway had already been proven to be based on forged documents.

Galloway did what no American on Capitol Hill could, he told the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Galloway turned the tables and put the entire US establishment on trial for arming Saddam, imposing genocidal sanctions which killed a million Iraqis, and then the two illegal wars which killed and maimed hundreds of thousands more.

Galloway appeared as a guest on The Alex Jones Show to discuss his Senate appearance and the subsequent fallout it generated.

At the end of the show Alex Jones asked Galloway if he thought an invasion of Iran was on the horizon. Galloway was confident that massively opposed public opinion would stop an attack from taking place, unless a staged terror attack carried out by the military industrial complex and blamed on Iran was carried out.

JONES: "What do we do if the military-industrial complex carries out a terror attack to blame it on them?"

GALLOWAY: "Well that's another very real danger. There's no way we can legislate for that but we we must be on guard. We need a vigilant citizenry."

JONES: "Unbelievable."

GALLOWAY: "We need a vigilant citizenry that are wise to all the tricks that these monkeys are up to."

cascadian

Comments

Hide the following 2 comments

Weapons Inspector Said...

07.07.2005 20:03

Scott Ritter (former weapons inspector) said Bush was looking for an invasion of Iran in June or July of 2005.

If this is somehow linked to Iran or used to justify attacks on Iran, I'm sure a fair few people will be wondering who was behind this... beyond Al-Queda.

Still... it's way to early to speculate.. and doing so.. especially with anything controversial will only get you labelled as a nutcase. (and rightly so with it being this early)

I still subscribe to the view that this was a revenge attack for Blair lying the UK (and consequently the UN) into supporting the "fixed" intelligence.. (as the Downing Street minutes indicate) that led to the invasion of Iraq... but I could easily be wrong.

...it's too early to play the blame and doing so is only going to annoy the people effected by this tragedy. :(

m3
- Homepage: http://methlabs.org


yes

07.07.2005 20:24

another thread on this site has said we should leave the critical analysis of what has happened to later...


if Iran is attacked and the Russians and the Chinese
decide to honour their new joint paper
which calls on the end to 'US led hegemony'

China, Russia issue joint statement on new world order
 http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-07/01/content_3164427.htm

and their decision to stand by Iran

then their will be no next day or next year for that matter

a great game is being played

i hate to say it...


i don't want to think it
i don't like being all doom and gloom
believe me...
i'm not doing this for a laugh




once again i pay tribute
to the emergency services and
send love to SOHO
fire station

and also wish to pay tribute to the peoples reaction today

they had real solidarity
caring for each other
and not panicking...

have a beer on me london
[an overpriced one at that!]











paul c