Skip to content or view screen version

Will Dissents's tactics work-discussion

red letter | 30.06.2005 11:59

.

It is common knowledge that Dissent and others are attempting to shut down the G8 by direct action. On Wednesday 6th July, they plan to blockade the roads with the aim to stop G8 support staff attending the summit. They figure that if enough support staff are unable to attend then the G8 summit will be forced to shut down.

I have doubts that this type of action will have a major impact and I feel this tactic is wrong.

Lets say prortesters do managed to stop 90% of the support staff, (which would be a remarkable achievement) i still think that the G8 show will still go ahead. and all that effort would be wasted.

I believe we should not go along with this.

So what is the alternative??

The stop the war coalition has called for as many people as possible to challenge the police and get as close to the G8 summit as possible. George Galloway has publicly stated that there will be "blood on the police's batons". i.e. there will be a show down between police and protesters.

I urge people to join this battle. I do not imagine that we will shut down the G8 but i think if there is violence the whole world will be watching, the police can only go so far because there masters are morally wrong about all of the issues particularly the war. All of the trade unions support this demo, church leaders and scottish MSP & MP (some of them will be on the march)

Just a thought.


red letter

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

another thought

30.06.2005 13:43

I can really see why one tactic is better than the other, surely blockading access to the summit can't be a waste of time...and hopefully there will be enough people there to fight police in both actions
C'mon we can do it!!!

antitodo

antitodo


If we blockade it, they will come

30.06.2005 14:41

I can imagine that trying to blockade the summit might have exactly the effect GG is expecting.

No1


.

30.06.2005 15:30

Surely Galloway meant, when he said there'd be blood on the police's batons, that by stifling protest, the police are complicit in the crimes of the G8.

.


just a comment

01.07.2005 09:09

A very vaguely worded question/statement:

- what do you mean by success?

- who's defenition and voice/narrative will you believe in relation to disruption?

- is the success/failure of blockading simply down to whether the summit goes on or not, or other factors?

Since you have made it clear where you stand on the issue its not really worth pointing out the inherent bias made due to assumptions in your post red letter.

proffy