Who did what ?
Alison | 20.05.2005 13:38
Although the point of the post ( Selfridges no longer selling fur) was excellent news there is another angle to this story
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/05/311522.html
This post gives the impression that the Coallition Against The Fur Trade and its actions were the reason Selfridges made this decision. While we welcome the (minor) contribution they have made over the past year it is worth recording that the long term work has been done by us at Respect For Animals. We have had a concentrated campaign of demonstrations, letter writing, phone calls and leaflet hand-outs for nearly seven years.
Although we are all working toward the same aim a number of our people are a bit pissed off to see another group try and claim credit for our hard work.
This post gives the impression that the Coallition Against The Fur Trade and its actions were the reason Selfridges made this decision. While we welcome the (minor) contribution they have made over the past year it is worth recording that the long term work has been done by us at Respect For Animals. We have had a concentrated campaign of demonstrations, letter writing, phone calls and leaflet hand-outs for nearly seven years.
Although we are all working toward the same aim a number of our people are a bit pissed off to see another group try and claim credit for our hard work.
Alison
e-mail:
info@respectforanimals.org
Homepage:
http://www.respectforanimals.org
Comments
Display the following 3 comments