Skip to content or view screen version

Guy Debord's letters, 1957-1964

NOT BORED! | 11.05.2005 05:41 | Analysis

Despite Guy Debord's reservations about epistolary correspondences, he engaged in a great many of them -- so many, in fact, that it's going to take six full-sized volumes for Editions Fayard to publish them all.


Guy Debord's Letters, 1957-1964



I believe that all of the people who prefer personal letters to the [situationists'] journal lack the ability to elevate themselves to the generality of the same problems. Thus, they don't see that it is the same position, the same thing, but more utilizable by more people. Of course, if it is a question of saying, "we are all better than that" (than all writing), this is obvious. It is one of our basic themes. But an epistolary correspondence, even with a friend, even if one is understood, seems to me further away from the importance of living than the most profoundly calculated texts. It is even less satisying. (Guy Debord, letter of 2 September 1964 to Ivan Chtcheglov)



Despite Guy Debord's reservations about epistolary correspondences, he engaged in a great many of them -- so many, in fact, that it's going to take six full-sized volumes for Editions Fayard to publish them all. To date, four of them have come out: Volume 1, 1957-1960 (published in 1999); Volume 2, 1961-1964 (2001); Volume 3, 1965-1968 (2003); and Volume 4, 1969-1972 (2005). It isn't known what will be contained in Volume 5 (1973-1976? 1973-1994?). But it is known that Volume 6 will include the pre-1957 period, plus letters that have been received between 1999 and the conclusion of this immense work.

In her introduction to Volume 1, Alice Becker-Ho (a.k.a. Alice Debord) writes:


This global correspondence, which is rich in lessons on the personality and active role that he had during these forty years, thus take their place in the complete works of Guy Debord. It will perhaps orient differently the always growing number of biographers who are pressed to draw premature conclusions from all sorts of legends that have surrounded someone who was especially pleased to have a well-known bad reputation.


But the publication of these letters -- and the translation of these letters into English -- will not simply help "orient" biographers of Debord. These events will help readers of all kinds reach a better understanding of this modern "Renaissance man," who was a co-founder of both the Lettrist International and the Situationist International, an author of books of critical theory (including The Society of the Spectacle), a filmmaker, and a translator (he was fluent in both Italian and Castellan, as well as his native tongue, which was French).

As a matter of fact, one of the most popular literary forms practiced during the European Renaissance was the "private" letter, which, though usually addressed to a close friend, was also intended for a wider audience and, one hoped, for posterity as well. Unlike more confining literary forms (such as the novella or the epic poem), the "private" letter allowed the writer to express personal feelings as well as objective insights. As a result, such letters were rich sources of valuable information about the lives and times of these writers. They also contained some of the era's best prose.

In Debord's letters, we "hear" him speaking in a variety of tones, some of which may come as a surprise to those readers who think Debord was a stern, self-absorbed, cutting, distant, haughty, or icy man. Some of these tones can indeed be heard in his letters, but so can others: depending on the context and the person to whom he was addressing himself, Debord could be warm, friendly, encouraging, funny, even sensitive and vulnerable. After reading these letters, it is impossible to take for granted the "bad reputation" that he acquired over the course of his life.

In preparing Guy Debord's Letters, 1957-1964, we have not translated every letter that appears in the first two volumes of Correspondance. Instead, we have translated what we feel to be the most interesting, relevant and useful ones. In time -- that is, as we translate the other volumes, for our intention to translate all six -- we may well add a few more to this compendium of the first two volumes. In keeping with the original format, our translations are arranged in chronological order. Though we have been sorely tempted, we have not added any annotations of our own, preferring instead to simply translate those footnotes provided by Alice herself.

-- NOT BORED! 9 May 2005

NOT BORED!
- Homepage: http://www.notbored.org/debord.html

Comments

Hide the following 5 comments

anarchist eurocentrism

11.05.2005 09:08

The Western-european-centricity of the 1st S.I. is very widely documented, especially after most of the Algerian section left in 1960, and the 2nd SI and the Antinational were formed. debord is the epitome of that eurocentrism and that's why he is adored by all those careerists, cultural critics, academics, artists and defenders of 'debordian psychogeography'

for those interested in the living legacy of the situationists:
 http://www.mdx.org.uk/mapfestival.html

for a more critical take on debord see:
 http://www.metamute.com/look/article.tpl?IdLanguage=1&IdPublication=1&NrIssue=24&NrSection=5&NrArticle=1503

evol


how politically correct of you!

13.05.2005 13:21

>The Western-european-centricity of the 1st S.I. is very widely documented,

yes, by people of questionable intent

>especially after most of the Algerian section left in 1960,

you mean all two of them? wow.
Debord had nothing to do with their departure.
It was Vaneigem who was in love with exclusions, not Guy.
Your allegation is easily disproved by the membership in the SI of Ovadia (Israel), Khayati (Palestine), Vienet (China) and all the American members

>and the 2nd SI and the Antinational were formed.

In Scandanavia, which is -- you guessed it! -- in Europe.

>debord is the epitome of that eurocentrism and that's why he is adored by all those careerists, cultural critics, academics, artists and defenders of 'debordian psychogeography'

NOT BORED! is none of these and we don't even "adore" him. All we do (at the moment) is translate him into English so that people can make up there minds for themselves.


NOT BORED!


NO USELESS LENIENCY

13.05.2005 16:09

it was debord and others like bernstein who believed in exclusions not just vaneigm. anyway, it was a group - a collective organisation, not a collection of individuals/ personalities: and that is the important thing. the things they did they did together.

u say that the presence of one israeli (who resigned in 61) and one palestinian and one chinese shows that the si wasn't eurocentric, yet when two algerians leave (who constituted an important part of the lettrist international as well as the 1si) it is insignificant???

the 1si was a very small group and its internationalism consisted of a very tiny amount of people. and still the overwhelming majority of 1SI were western european (so even the scandinavean section were marginalised) . and so if we say the 1SI was biased towards the west in its eurocentrism, perhaps we could call the american section the ULTRA-WEST

and as for intentions, my friends, all intentions are questionable

and yet i prefer to be politically correct rather than politically questionable or politically insecure, which is what anarchism amounts to.

Luther Baba


evol/LutherBaba/whatever your "real" pseudonym is

13.05.2005 19:19

thanks for sharing!
now bugger off.

snark!snark!snark!


lark lark lark

14.05.2005 10:00

it wasn't meant for you! give it back!

work work work