EDO injunction latest
EDOSMASHNIK | 09.05.2005 14:29 | Anti-militarism | Repression | London | South Coast
Update on the ongoing civil injunction being pursued againt anyone who might want to protest against a Brighton arms company supplying military equipment for the occuation of Iraq
The interim injunction aimed at quelling protest at EDO MBM technology is still being negotiated over by both sides. Watch this space for details...
However, we do know that the interim injunction is far more lenient than that requested by EDO MBM. There are no limits on timing and duration of protest near the factory and very few limits on where the demonstrationstake place. However, the issuing of any interim injunction at all is a further misuse of the Prevention of Harrassment Act 1997 and a further attack on civil liberties in this country
Right now there there are no limits (other than the already draconian criminal law) against protests at EDO MBM so get up there this Wednesday 4-6pm meeting in Wild Park, near the bottom of Home Farm Road, just past the Viaduct on Lewes Road, Brighton
However, we do know that the interim injunction is far more lenient than that requested by EDO MBM. There are no limits on timing and duration of protest near the factory and very few limits on where the demonstrationstake place. However, the issuing of any interim injunction at all is a further misuse of the Prevention of Harrassment Act 1997 and a further attack on civil liberties in this country
Right now there there are no limits (other than the already draconian criminal law) against protests at EDO MBM so get up there this Wednesday 4-6pm meeting in Wild Park, near the bottom of Home Farm Road, just past the Viaduct on Lewes Road, Brighton
EDOSMASHNIK
e-mail:
smashedo@hotmail.com
Homepage:
http://www.smashedo.org.uk
Comments
Hide the following 3 comments
Where are people allowed to go???
11.05.2005 15:41
Can people protest/demostrate outside EDO itself?
or is the banned?
EDOPhobe-Manchester
demos
12.05.2005 08:52
edosmashnik
correction
12.05.2005 08:56
this is not the case - the judge has made a ruling on the terms of an interim injunction, there is disagreement over the interpretation of the judges ruling
watch this space
edosmasnik