Management and union all cosy together
Sushila Burgess | 30.04.2005 21:27 | Anti-racism | Education | Social Struggles | Workers' Movements | Oxford
When I had problems and lost my job at Brookes, I thought the union might help me, but no. I started complaining about the way the union behaved, but got ignored till I told them I would put all the emails from them up on the web. Then they got MANAGEMENT’s solicitor to write a letter trying to gag me! Does anyone smell a rat?
Basically I lost my job at Oxford Brookes University because I had a nervous breakdown. And I had a nervous breakdown because I had been racially harassed in the area where I lived – New Marston, Oxford – with gangs of kids shouting “Paki” and making monkey noises at me till I couldn’t even face taking my own little child to the park, and with adults joining in from time to time. Most white people don’t seem to know or care about what goes on in the poorer areas of Oxford, and that includes both management and union at Oxford Brookes. I’m taking Brookes to the Employment Tribunal (in Reading, hearing on 7th-8th July), so I can’t really go into the details of the case yet. But the union didn’t show even a flicker of sympathy for what I’d been through.
The interesting thing is, I finally got to the stage where I told the union that if they didn’t apologise for how they’d treated me, I would publish my correspondence with them on the web. Then they FREAKED! One union representative, Ann Black, who is also a member of the Labour Party’s National Executive Committee, wrote to me saying “I assume you have already copied this to , all of whom figure by name, as I and others may wish to make a collective response.” A collective response! A lovely collective of management and union! Doesn’t that warm the cockles of your heart? And a few days later, I did indeed get a letter from management’s solicitor, trying to warn me off publishing the correspondence. So nice to know that unions can cooperate with employers, specially when it comes to making sure that sacked employees keep quiet about what has been going on. See my website if you want more details.
The interesting thing is, I finally got to the stage where I told the union that if they didn’t apologise for how they’d treated me, I would publish my correspondence with them on the web. Then they FREAKED! One union representative, Ann Black, who is also a member of the Labour Party’s National Executive Committee, wrote to me saying “I assume you have already copied this to , all of whom figure by name, as I and others may wish to make a collective response.” A collective response! A lovely collective of management and union! Doesn’t that warm the cockles of your heart? And a few days later, I did indeed get a letter from management’s solicitor, trying to warn me off publishing the correspondence. So nice to know that unions can cooperate with employers, specially when it comes to making sure that sacked employees keep quiet about what has been going on. See my website if you want more details.
Sushila Burgess
Homepage:
http://www.sushilaburgess.co.uk
Comments
Hide the following 6 comments
.
01.05.2005 18:31
chris stevens
Unions and representing members
03.05.2005 12:30
Ann Black
Sympathy
06.05.2005 10:43
N.
Some questions
11.05.2005 22:22
I'd like to repeat that I wish you every success in your appeal for your job.
richarddirecttv
A quick answer to the last comment - more to follow
13.05.2005 20:37
You say I've made serious allegations which I haven't proven. I have lots of other emails which I could publish and probably will soon, once I have finished my immediate task of preparing my case for the Employment Tribunal. I haven't released all my evidence yet, precisely because it is going to a tribunal, and there seems to be a general consensus that it is bad practice to discuss a tribunal case in public before the hearing.
However, there seem to be two points which you are raising.
1.) The question of how Brookes management knew about my plans for a website, and therefore were able to send out a letter trying to warn me off BEFORE I had told them about my plans. I wrote to selected Unison members from Oxford Brookes at 11:44 on 15th April, saying I wanted an apology for the way they had treated me, otherwise I would publish my correspondence with them on the Internet. At 13:02 on 15th April, Ann Black, a UNISON official, sent me the following message:
------
Sue
I assume that you have already copied this to Roxanne Teale, Stuart
Brown, Helen Workman, Isobel Ellison, Phil Stuhldreer and Ann
Crosthwaite, all of whom figure by name, as I and others may wish to
make a collective response. No doubt they will contact you directly
if they wish to comment.
Ann
------
Please note that Phil Stuhldreer, named above in Ann Black's email, is the Deputy Director of Human Resources at Oxford Brookes, and is the Brookes contact for this Employment Tribunal case. I can send you a photocopy of an official form if you want further confirmation of this. I admit this is only circumstantial evidence that management may have heard about my plans via Ann Black, but no reasonable person would totally dismisss the possibility that that's how they got hold of the information - and do you have any other ideas about how the news got out?
2.) You seem to think Unison were fairly sympathetic to me. I think you must be a few sandwiches short of a picnic if that is your sincere opinion. Try looking again at this web page: http://www.sushilaburgess.co.uk/unison201004.htm
Next look at http://www.sushilaburgess.co.uk/#AnnBlack and read on down the rest of the website.
All I am saying is that I spent about £15 per month on Unison fees for the 19 months that I worked at Brookes. That comes to about £285. I don't think that was money well spent, and that is the point I am trying to make to people who might be enticed by the slogan "Unison, your friend at work". With friends like those, who needs enemies?
Sushila
Homepage: http://www.sushilaburgess.co.uk
Another answer
14.05.2005 08:24
Sushila (Sue) Burgess
Homepage: http://www.sushilaburgess.co.uk