Confessions of a Former Member of the Socialist Worker Party (SWP)
James F | 19.04.2005 23:27 | Analysis
I was a member of the SWP from 2000-2001. I want to tell you all about what the party is really about. I am an environmentalist, a socialist and perhaps some sort of anarchist who desperately wants to see radical change and is so frustrated and disillusioned by the activities of this group which discredits and damages our cause.
Dear All (especially the electorate in Bethnal Green & Bow)
The reason why the protest movement has failed over the Iraq War II, anti-capitalism, reclaim the streets and other major issues is because these genuine, organic, spontaneous protest movements have been infiltrated and poluted by the activities of the deeply misguided Socialist Worker Party.
Any protest against ANYTHING is the target of the SWP to try and dominate and subvert to their own extremely narrow agenda......which seems to be to take money for the sale of their shite newspaper...which is very strange for a pseudo-marxist political organisation (or is it?). Their organisation is based on the work of many deluded, but usually with hearts in the right place, volounteers who are bullied by local organisers.
I was a member of the SWP for a year.
I joined the SWP in 2000 at the same time as when Ken Livingstone was ejected from the Labour Party for standing as an independent in the London Mayoral Election.
Initially I was optimistic because I believed that the SWP were the only socialist political movement that had any real organisational structure with a network of volounteers in the London area.
Very quickly it became apparent that debate within the SWP was, basically, frowned upon. I and other 'workers' were told by our local 'captain' (the name of the person in any area who is to organise the SWP members until the time comes for an uprising and....and then no-one really knew..) that the policy of the SWP was decided by un-named persons at the top of the party who we might get to see speaking at rallies but basically were unable to be approached by persons as lowly as us. Their judgement on issues was final and that that was the end of the matter.
The most important thing for us was to facilitate, above all other considerations, the selling and distribution of the SWP newspaper...which was written by these esteemed grandmasters. We were also to deliver leaflets to doors in our local area which were sent to us with extreme regularity (about three times a week). Many of which were on a variety of causes, seemingly chosen to be confrontational or of extreme minority interest, and I often did not agree with.
I worked at it for a while. But as my enthusiasm for being an SWP clone waned, and the path to enlightenment within the party was blocked to me by a jealous matriarchal core of militantly nepotistic lesbians (at least in my area, not that I have any problem with lesbians at all).
The SWP has no plan to actually DO anything. It's leaders actively discourage any member from taking part in any other political cause not yet twisted to their aims. It's only policies were this:
Sell "The Socialist Worker".
Oppose anything the government does, no matter what it is.
Oppose anything by any other leftist political group not yet infiltrated by the SWP.
The Unity Coalition is an ramshackle alliance of convenience by two extremist groups both of whom are totally unelectable on their own, and hopefully together. The alliance of the SWP and the radicalised Moslem community.
The election of George Galloway will cause enormous problems for the multi-ethnic and multi-faith community of this constituency. It will inflame already tense relations, empower the worst elements of local radical islam, and alienate the minority of non-moslems around here and cause genuine fear.
Bethnal Green & Bow has many local issues of real importance to people. Neither of these groups intends to do anything to help them. It is extremely concerning that a "left wing" politician - George Galloway - is depending on election by pandering to the extreme right wing views of some moslems in east London. Without exaggeration isn't this how the National Socialist Party began in Germany during the 1920's?
I think the best bet in this area (with a realistic chance of success) are the Lib Dems.
James F
The reason why the protest movement has failed over the Iraq War II, anti-capitalism, reclaim the streets and other major issues is because these genuine, organic, spontaneous protest movements have been infiltrated and poluted by the activities of the deeply misguided Socialist Worker Party.
Any protest against ANYTHING is the target of the SWP to try and dominate and subvert to their own extremely narrow agenda......which seems to be to take money for the sale of their shite newspaper...which is very strange for a pseudo-marxist political organisation (or is it?). Their organisation is based on the work of many deluded, but usually with hearts in the right place, volounteers who are bullied by local organisers.
I was a member of the SWP for a year.
I joined the SWP in 2000 at the same time as when Ken Livingstone was ejected from the Labour Party for standing as an independent in the London Mayoral Election.
Initially I was optimistic because I believed that the SWP were the only socialist political movement that had any real organisational structure with a network of volounteers in the London area.
Very quickly it became apparent that debate within the SWP was, basically, frowned upon. I and other 'workers' were told by our local 'captain' (the name of the person in any area who is to organise the SWP members until the time comes for an uprising and....and then no-one really knew..) that the policy of the SWP was decided by un-named persons at the top of the party who we might get to see speaking at rallies but basically were unable to be approached by persons as lowly as us. Their judgement on issues was final and that that was the end of the matter.
The most important thing for us was to facilitate, above all other considerations, the selling and distribution of the SWP newspaper...which was written by these esteemed grandmasters. We were also to deliver leaflets to doors in our local area which were sent to us with extreme regularity (about three times a week). Many of which were on a variety of causes, seemingly chosen to be confrontational or of extreme minority interest, and I often did not agree with.
I worked at it for a while. But as my enthusiasm for being an SWP clone waned, and the path to enlightenment within the party was blocked to me by a jealous matriarchal core of militantly nepotistic lesbians (at least in my area, not that I have any problem with lesbians at all).
The SWP has no plan to actually DO anything. It's leaders actively discourage any member from taking part in any other political cause not yet twisted to their aims. It's only policies were this:
Sell "The Socialist Worker".
Oppose anything the government does, no matter what it is.
Oppose anything by any other leftist political group not yet infiltrated by the SWP.
The Unity Coalition is an ramshackle alliance of convenience by two extremist groups both of whom are totally unelectable on their own, and hopefully together. The alliance of the SWP and the radicalised Moslem community.
The election of George Galloway will cause enormous problems for the multi-ethnic and multi-faith community of this constituency. It will inflame already tense relations, empower the worst elements of local radical islam, and alienate the minority of non-moslems around here and cause genuine fear.
Bethnal Green & Bow has many local issues of real importance to people. Neither of these groups intends to do anything to help them. It is extremely concerning that a "left wing" politician - George Galloway - is depending on election by pandering to the extreme right wing views of some moslems in east London. Without exaggeration isn't this how the National Socialist Party began in Germany during the 1920's?
I think the best bet in this area (with a realistic chance of success) are the Lib Dems.
James F
James F
e-mail:
hornyjamie25@hotmail.com
Comments
Hide the following 16 comments
time for another split
20.04.2005 00:31
Join the Socialist Wankers Unity Respect Collective (Marxist Anarchist deviation)!
http://www.geocities.com/socialistworkersunity/policies.htm
We are the only ones that are true to the principles of the great leaders - Bob Marley, Stalin, Lenin, Castro, Che Guevara, Dalai Lama, Arthur Scargill, Malcolm X, Red Robbo, Pol Pot, Bob Mugabe, Swampy and ZAPATISTA!
SWURC
And today's Central Committe Dictat is...
20.04.2005 00:58
Having dealt with them in my own locality (although never having been a member), I wholly agree with the view of them being out to actively co-opt/infiltrate any activist groups seen to be moderately left leaning in their worldview, as they quite effectively destroyed the local student anti-war group with the in-fighting they caused by their petty power manouvers, and therefore in the process silenced any type of credible independant voice that the student population in our area may have had on the subject of the Iraq War.
Hell, with these guys about, who needs to worry about Special Branch psyops, as they're pretty good at doing the Police's job for them!
I too have always been deeply suspicious of their top-down approach to organising themselves, with their anonymous central committee, because I too have read the history of Communism and know how that ended up.
It's worth noting though, that they've been heamorraging members over the last couple of years, due to many people (like yourself) becoming disillusioned with them.
As for George Galloway, well, I used to think he was alright, until I discovered that he was linked to the oil for food programme, that the Respect party are rumoured to have embezzled money from the Socialist Alliance, and that he is ultimately only interested in looking after his own political career.
Does he deserve any votes?
Frankly no.
It's also worth noting that the Animal Rights movement has not suffered at all from infiltration by the SWP. The main reasons being that in the SWP's version of Socialism non human sentient beings don't appear have rights, and that the Animal Rights movement has been resilient enough to stand up to far worse infiltrations (by MI6 and the like) than anything they could throw at it, meaning that even if the SWP tried their luck they would be told in no uncertain terms to fuck off.
As for saying that the only local 'alternative' you have to the above slightly sad old blighters is voting for the Lib Dems, well, you could find like minded people and start up your own campaigning group(s).
Just don't invite the SWP to your meetings.
Independant Thinker
ummm
20.04.2005 01:01
confused
George's Galloway's Voting Record on Gay Rights
20.04.2005 07:05
further to my exploration of the impact of a Galloway/Respect victory in Bethnal Green & Bow the results of this search on Galloway's voting record between 2001-2005 is interesting:
Civil Partnership Bill - 12 Oct 2004 - Division No. 256
George Galloway - ABSENT
Categories of civil partners other than same sex couples - 9 Nov 2004 - Division No. 314
George Galloway - ABSENT
Categories of civil partners other than same sex couples — Schedule 28 — Consequential amendments: Scotland - 9 Nov 2004 - Division No. 315
George Galloway - ABSENT
Relationships (Civil Registration) - 24 Oct 2001 - Division No. 41
George Galloway - ABSENT
Adoption and Children Bill (Programme) — Consideration and Third Reading
George Galloway - AYE
Adoption and Children Bill — [2nd Allotted Day] — Applications for adoption - 16 May 2002 - Division No. 244
George Galloway - ABSENT
Adoption and Children Bill — [3rd Allotted Day] — Clause 131 — General interpretation, etc. - 20 May 2002 - Division No. 246
George Galloway - ABSENT
Adoption and Children Bill — Suitability Of Adopters - 4 Nov 2002 - Division No. 345
George Galloway - AYE
Local Government Bill — [2nd Allotted Day] — New Clause 11 — Repeal of Section 2A of Local Government Act 1986 - 10 Mar 2003 - Division No. 109
George Galloway - ABSENT
SOURCE: http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/mp.php?mpid=1354&dmp=371&display=motions
I think the almost complete absence of any support for gay rights while as an MP between 2001-2005 is a very ominous track record for gay and lesbian people living in Bethnal Green & Bow. By not voting at all he was actually aiding the opponents of equality and change. If he wins the election here and attacks on gay and lesbian citizens by far-right islamic radicals like al-Muhajiroun and Hezb-ut-Tahrir who believe that homosexuals "must" be killed increase, will he just turn his back? He has actively sought to keep on the side of moslem fundamentalists to the detriment of other members of the local community who need an MP's support.
Another good reason to reject the Galloway Nazi party.
James F
e-mail: hornyjamie25@hotmail.com
oh please.....
20.04.2005 09:09
there have never ever, ever, ever been people in the SWP called 'captains', this is a figment of 'horny jamies' imagination.
And im sorry but you totally discredit yourself when you say your local SWP was run by a group of 'militantly nepotistic lesbians'. one question: if your not a homophobe then why raise their sexuality?
comparing george galloway to the Nazis (a la Nick Cohen in the Guardian) is truly Orwellian....he has been the best opponent in Parliament of a bloody, muderous, imperial war. A preventive attack no less which was the hallmark of Nazism. The respect coaltion actually has the most ethinically mixed number of candidates of any party in Britain. Again War=peace, ignorance=strength, and respect=nazis.....
WAKE UP, or get some help, im mean seriously!
rebel heart
methinks they do protest too much!
20.04.2005 10:17
type
James F Doesn't Know Anything
20.04.2005 11:14
You say you were in the SWP for a year and didn't get to know the name of committe members. Well then, you can't have been reading the paper which you claim you spent so much of your time selling.
The idea that the SWP brought down the anti war movement is the opposite of the truth. The convenyor of StWC, the single biggest mass movement un British history, is the SWP's Lindsay German. I will leave it the women to take you on about your sexist language.
Perhaps the SWP could be characterised as ultra left and therefore by some with a limited vocabularly as extremist. But your characterisation of the 'radicalised muslim community' as such indicates that you probably have not had a conversation with a Muslim for years.
That you characterise Muslims as extreme right wingers and imply that Galloway's election will cause ethnic problems shows that you are selling the same filthy lies as the imperialist stooges named above.
That you want radical change and advise people to vote Lib Dem shows you up as a bar room bore. And the Lib Dems have not a hope of winning Bethnal Green where the Tories had twice Lib votes in the last general election.
Galloway stood against the war for three years and you come back with AWL-Cohen statistics about his voting record on pedestrian parliamentary issues.
Anybody who badly wants real change should work to get Galloway's motor mouth operating in Parliament, where he can get exposure for the fine work he does in the cause of real Socialism and Peace.
Hu
what a load of shite
20.04.2005 12:56
tthinks that all muslims are extremists
is a secterian
also if you did not like or thought selling the socialist newspaper, why did you do it?? w
gp
Horses for Courses..?
20.04.2005 15:04
However, my previous comment was based on actual events and therefore I stand by it.
Personally I'm all for Gay Rights, and shall leave it at that.
However, it still stands that there are aspects of the SWP that lead them to be both coercive and cynically manipulative of other activist groups - I say this because I've seen them do it firsthand.
On the other hand, love 'em or loath 'em, they do get people on the streets, and the reason they manage this is because they know how to coordinate their efforts on a national scale in a fairly coherent way.
I'm not saying this makes them wonderful or worthy of our open arms, what I am saying is that there are lessons to be learned from analysing the methods they use to achieve this end goal, whether you agree with their politics or not.
And it's worth pointing out (in the wider context of mobilising people) that it's not all about them using bully-boy tactics either, so they must be doing at least something right somewhere somehow. Even the most cynical of you reading this would have to admit that.
This, by the way is not a party political broadcast from an SWP member either, as I've never ever been interested in becoming one of their precious little inner circle of 'comrades' as I've always thought that was quite a school playground approach to politics ('You're alright, 'cos you're in my gang'), alienating more people than it convinces.
It's a commentary from someone who has observed how they operate on a local level from fairly close quarters (and from the orbit of many different campaigns over the years).
My point is that, even if we all hate them, there are still lessons to be learned, both in how to mobilise large numbers of people, but also how not to conduct yourselves when liasing with other groups who are supposed to be your allies.
Independant Thinker
come on now
20.04.2005 15:26
We say we aren't communists, but we can always be seen wearing "Che Guevara" t-shirts from GAP, and waving hammer and sickle banners, or standing next to them, at "mass action" demo's with other like minded anarchists/marxists/socialists (same thing really!).
True anarchists would have a lot of time for Maggie Thatcher as she was against big government too. That's why the Socialist Workers Unity Collective (Marxist-Anarchist deviation) is the only true Socialist anarchist grouping in the movement. Not to be confused with the Socialist Workers Party or the Respect Unity George Galloway (Brackets) Coalition of course.
Tarquin Dibert-Soames
Salma the rat slayer
20.04.2005 15:52
there's a rat in me kitchen what am I gonna do?
Respect o kill
A 'true anarchist' writes...
20.04.2005 16:23
Not to mention her obsession with increasing police powers and mobilising the full force of the State against miners/trade unionists/black people/anyone else she didn't like.
Remember, toerags - right wing "libertarians" are only consistent in one area - THEY LIE.
As for the SWP its the same as any other lefty sect - some members are alright, and some are right tossers.
It doesn't actually signify anything.
CAMR@
Ignore this troll tossbag
20.04.2005 16:27
Ex RTS er
Ha
20.04.2005 16:41
You talk about the SWP more than the SWP does.
You denounce the SWP more than you denouce Blair.
And Indymedia provides a nod and a wink for it all...
Memory-Hole-Catchers-Mitt
defending what I wrote at the beginning
20.04.2005 23:22
I expected I would receive personal abuse and vitriolic attack for saying what I said. It didn't stop me though, which is a good thing and I am sure you would all appreciate that I won't be cowed by people when expressing my own experiences and opinions.
For the record I was a member of the SWP from 2000-2001. I never renewed my subscription. I wanted to get involved in debating ideas and finding ways in which we could really seek to ferment change and radicalise the people to take action. Alas, the SWP was not interested in this, merely in making sure it's paper sold and that people held banners with the SWP logo on them to make any demonstration look like it had been organised entirely by them.
It is true, Reclaim the Streets is probably not a very good example, at least in it's early days, but they (SWP) were certainly there handing out the plakards with slogans on them far removed from what the people attending a RTS demonstration were there for.
SWP was caught on the hop by the massive spontaneous Anti Capitalist movement of the mid 1990's. It was clear they piggy backed on that bandwagon to promote their own narrow interests and by doing so put off many people who did not agree with the bland propaganda they put out and did not want to appear to support it. Each person attending was there for their own reasons...not for the SWP's.
I would like to attempt to explain my fears about a moslem backlash in east London which will be caused by Respect. I know that any commentary on this is automatically attacked by some as "racist". As for the comments that I have "not talked to a Moslem for a year"....well I met my dealer last night and last time I checked he was a moslem. And several friends at work are as well, not to mention a few former lovers. I am patently not racist. I am just afraid because there are many people in Tower Hamlets who are moslems who are racist and exhibit extreme bigotry to anyone else who is not a moslem.
I have lived in Tower Hamlets since 1997. I am a gay man. I don't openly exhibit my sexuality, it is my own matter, but other young men have an uncanny way of telling if someone is gay or not. In 1998 I lived on Valance Road in a block called Hughes Mansions. The same block that Oona King got attacked at with shouts that she was a Jew...these same lads who lived there set fire to the door of my flat because I was "probably" gay. That same year me and two friends, one female, were badly beaten up just off Brick Lane for the same reason. So I moved. At the next address I lived at only a few streets away a different Asian gang targeted me, this time for being a "white bastard". One night I left home and found a young man outside waiting with a sword. I called the police. After this I was frequently targeted whenever I went to the shops, first for being white, then for being gay. I had people shout at me threatening to murder me and that I would "burn in the black fire". I was chased by a gang armed with knives. Eventually I was afforded police protection and had to move again. I have seen two pubs burned down because people did not want alcohol sold on their streets (The Queens Head - now demolished, and Pride of Spitalfields - now refurbished). They were a calculated and deliberate attack on the minority white community around here with the intention of intimidating and showing who's boss.
If any of you have ever been on the receiving end of genuine death threats, who were totally terrorised and unable to leave their own home - even during the day - you would understand my concerns about the passions being enflamed at the moment around here (Bethnal Green & Bow). I think George Galloway himself is now beginning to understand the true situation in Tower Hamlets considering the reception he got yesterday.
There are some extremely intolerant people around here who would not be bothered if they were called homophobic, racist and violent. Just because they are Asian does not make that ok. I condemn all racism, intimidation, intolerance and hatred wherever it comes from - especially because I have been a victim of it.
I don't think affording equal rights to people regardless of the sexuality is a pedestrian issue. It is human rights. I checked out those voting records because I was considering voting for George Galloway...but seeing his complete lack of support for those bills in parliament makes me think that if I or any of my gay friends were attacked by homophobes around here then our new MP George Galloway would probably do and say nothing about it for fear of angering his moslem electorate.
I am a product of my own life experience and my experience has taught me that all this talk about the war and about the killing of moslems is winding a lot of teenage boys up and encouraging some people around here to want to take revenge - even on people like me who UTTERLY condemned the war and did everything I ever could as an individual to try and stop it.
That is why I am scared of George Galloway. There is more at stake here than just a feather in the cap of a single politician, it's actually badly effecting ordinary people's lives.
PS - I am not a member of MI5....jeez
James F
e-mail: hornyjamie25@hotmail.com
Unsectarian
10.05.2005 15:24
Pearly White