Skip to content or view screen version

Accedemic Boycott of Zionists Univerisities

Douglas Davis | 16.04.2005 13:46 | Anti-racism | Education | Technology | London | World

Anti-Semitic studies

Pay attention, Professor. If you support the proposed academic boycott of Israel — and if you are to remain intellectually honest — prepare for a radical lifestyle change. Firstly, unplug your computer. Good. Now switch off your interactive digital television set. Well done. And now throw away your mobile phone. Excellent. You see, Professor, these machines are not only the engine of the globalised, capitalist world but they also depend on technologies that have been produced by Israeli academics in the Zionist entity.

Stop playing with your detached mouse, Professor, and concentrate. I’m afraid you may not use the British Library because it has been computerised by Ex Libris, a Zionist company that was spawned by the odious Hebrew University of Jerusalem. And if, God forbid, you develop problems of the small intestine, you may not pop the Zionist-invented ‘video capsule’, which passes naturally through your body as it monitors this delicate piece of your anatomy. You will, sadly, have to take it up the derrière, Professor. As a matter of principle, of course. But remember: your principle allows your proctologist to keep his hand in.

All this boycotting, you see, is the logical extension of proposed academic sanctions against Israel by some members of your Association of University Teachers (AUT) when they meet in Eastbourne next Wednesday. Just visit the website of Egyptian-born Mona Baker of the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology. She set the standard by firing two Israeli scholars from the boards of her translation journals as a matter of high academic principle.

You will see that Ms Baker’s ambitions do not end with the academic boycott. Her website also includes a section entitled ‘Boycott Israeli Products & Services’, which features dozens of global brands that, inconveniently, are not Israeli at all. The offenders presumably have earned their place in infamy by dealing with the Zionist entity, by being owned by Jews or by having Jews on their boards. They range from Coca-Cola and Nescafé to Johnson & Johnson and Estée Lauder, from Hugo Boss and Ralph Lauren to Selfridges and Marks & Spencer, from Kleenex and Wonderbra to Lancôme and.... All marked for boycott.

Absent from Ms Baker’s list — and here I think I can help — is a set of global companies which are arguably even more culpable because they not only operate in Israel but also do most of their R&D there. IBM and Intel each have three R&D centres in Israel; Microsoft established its first non-American facility there, and Cisco Systems has built its only non-American R&D centre in Israel. Then there is Motorola, which has its largest R&D site in Israel, and News Corp, whose company NDS develops those neat interactive technologies for digital television. There are many more.

The AUT boycott brigade has cause for concern. It knows that these companies are attracted not only by the innate brutality of the expansionist regime but also by the cunning of its university graduates (most of the R&D centres are located on or near Israeli university campuses). Proportionally, the Zionist entity has more university graduates than any other country, while its scientists, engineers and agriculturists publish more professional papers per capita than do their counterparts anywhere else on earth. The result is that Israel has the largest concentration of high-tech companies outside Silicon Valley. But the ultimate sin is that Israel, which came to independence in the process of post-war decolonisation, stubbornly refuses to become a failed state.

So dangerous has the situation become, dear Professor, that when you meet in Eastbourne you will set aside the small matter of your pay deal (which many universities have failed to implement). Instead, you and your fellow intellectual heavyweights will ponder far worthier matters. Like foreign affairs. Of course, you will not have to bother your turbo-charged minds with this week’s Unicef report which shows that half of the women in the Arab world are illiterate and more than ten million children in the region don’t attend school.

The issue that will preoccupy you will be the aggressive imperialist apartheid state: a state that has nurtured the Palestinian universities and colleges in the West Bank; one that offers equal rights — and access to its universities — to all its citizens, regardless of race, religion, ethnicity or sex; and which has educated tens of thousands of Palestinians at Israeli universities (several hundred a year still opt for an Israeli education). It is significant that Omar Barghouti, the Palestinian who is encouraging you and your British comrades to boycott Israel, is a doctoral student at none other than Tel Aviv University.

No, Professor, not all Israeli universities and not all Israeli academics will be boycotted if the AUT motion is passed. Such a proposition was defeated 3–1 at the association’s conference two years ago, and the boycotters are too smart to repeat past mistakes. The new motion, says one of its authors, has been ‘tactically’ amended to get it passed. ‘We’ve got to be a bit more sophisticated,’ she says. And sophisticated they are. They even had a dry run last December, when they met to rehearse their presentations and develop killer responses to potential critics.

Their sleek new motion — which does not involve a single book-burning — envisages sanctions against only the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Tel Aviv University and Haifa University. And there’s more: the boycotters generously offer Israeli academics the opportunity to buy themselves immunity if they are prepared to denounce their country, specifically, ‘conscientious Israeli academics and intellectuals opposed to their state’s colonial and racist policies’. Who could seriously question the integrity of your fellow academic freedom fighters?

But there are, of course, small obstinate obstacles in the way of you visionaries, Professor. Britain’s academic institutions, for example, have not endorsed boycotting Israel’s academic community. Indeed, when the Oxford don Andrew Wilkie told an Israeli PhD applicant that there was ‘no way would I take on somebody who had served in the Israeli army’, he was hauled before the university’s disciplinary body and suspended without pay for two months.

Cambridge University’s Professor Sir Aaron Klug, Nobel laureate and former president of the Royal Society, put me right when I asked him about the possible impact — on Britain no less than on Israel — of such a boycott: ‘How important is the AUT? That’s the question you have to ask.’ He is no supporter of Israel’s Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, and his policies but he does consider that the proposed boycott is ‘ill considered and doesn’t promote anything at all’. The AUT, he says, is out to attack Israel ‘but this is no way to proceed’. Sir Aaron is ‘not one who looks for anti-Semitism around every corner,’ he says, ‘but I do think there’s an element of that here. It does give people who are anti-Semitic the opportunity to express themselves.’

But relax, Professor. The AUT has solemnly concluded that there is a clear distinction between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism. They don’t mind Jews. They just detest the Jewish state.

Douglas Davis

Comments

Hide the following 9 comments

israel again

16.04.2005 16:03

>>The AUT has solemnly concluded that there is a clear distinction between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism. They don’t mind Jews. They just detest the Jewish state.

action against israel by the uk academic community and by the unions +is long overdue+. no one should be browbeaten by the arrogant, vain, self-righteous contempt issuing from those who try to defend the actions of murderous, racist, expansionist, right wing nationalists who happen to be jews.

- -


Pathetic

18.04.2005 10:43

Boycotting academics because they were born in Israel or fled to Israel! what a disgrace. Israeli scientists have offered more to the world than anyone else.

If you are treated for heart disease or cancer, you will be treated with drugs and methods developed in Israel. Should these be denied to those who need them.

Boycotting academia is akin to burning books and anyone who suggests it is a facist who will deny seeking truth and advance hatred and mis-understanding.

Jewish and Proud


we are so special

19.04.2005 12:08

we are fantastic
we have never done anything wrong
you owe us everything

hmmm?!?

could be just another racist supremacist cult on the other hand

the choosen


Boycott the boycotter

19.04.2005 20:24

I believe that it is time that a campaign was launched by Israel's supporters to boycott people involved in the attempt to boycott Israeli institutions. Self respecting academics must not and cannot tolerate the intolerant. A counter boycott would put an end to the anti-Semitic boycott Israel campaign as it will hit these academics where it hurts, in their pockets.

Zion 1
mail e-mail: zion1_48@hotmail.com


israels development is light-years ahead!

20.04.2005 13:31

... just check it out

 http://judicial-inc.biz/Zakheim_surplus.htm

... and then roll around laughing!!!

perspective


.

24.04.2005 12:54

16.04.2005 17:03

>>The AUT has solemnly concluded that there is a clear distinction between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism. They don’t mind Jews. They just detest the Jewish state.

action against israel by the uk academic community and by the unions +is long overdue+. no one should be browbeaten by the arrogant, vain, self-righteous contempt issuing from those who try to defend the actions of murderous, racist, expansionist, right wing nationalists who happen to be jews.


What about left wing hippies wha ARE Jews?

abc


The Jewish Sayanim

28.06.2005 00:03

This is Anne Frank’s hidden annex




Read the truth


Mark Twain


reply to Douglas Davis

08.07.2005 15:58

Thank you so much for pointing out all the good that Israel does - I'm sure the inhabitants of Jenin were honoured to be mown down by the artillery fire of such a benevolent democracy.

Mo Schuyler


reply to "israels development is light-years ahead!"

08.07.2005 16:23

yes, I checked that website. Ihaven't laughed so much since I watched "Schindler's List" (that was based on a book called "schindler's Ark; it won the Booker prize - for fiction. Obviously the panel there also know that the holler-caust was untrue)

Mo Schuyler
mail e-mail: shawi@hotmail.com