HAS "CANCER RESEARCH" KILLED SOMEONE CLOSE TO YOU?


by Pat Rattigan


The Cancer Business is the world's second largest industry, and inextricably linked with the no. 1 - petrochemicals. Before they started trading as "Cancer Research UK", the Imperial Cancer Research Fund and the Cancer Research Campaign had around 170 years of fundraising between them. Now, CRUK are now clawing in well over £300,000,000 per year.


When they started, cancer was a rare disease, now it is an out-of-control epidemic, with 40% - and rising - of the UK population having, or will develop, cancer. We face a theoretical 100% cancer incidence within decades. The Cancer Business has three main facets:


* Financing, developing and promoting treatments known to kill the patient a lot faster than the disease does. In 1975 America's leading cancer statistician, Prof Hardin B Jones of the Dept of Physics and Physiology, University of California, told the cancer industry - "My studies have proved conclusively that untreated cancer victims live up to four times longer than treated individuals. If one has cancer and opts to do nothing at all, he will live longer and feel better than if he undergoes radiation, chemotherapy or surgery other than when used in immediate life-threatening situation."


Bereaved relatives should realise that few people die from cancer. Many die within months, or weeks, from the lethal effects of the treatments used to suppress or remove cancer symptoms.


* Ignoring, ridiculing, suppressing or sabotaging safe, effective, natural, inexpensive treatments for cancer. Evidence from patients and practitioners has been piling up for decades as to the naturopathic treatments that are successfully treating cancer victims.


Meanwhile, CRUK have squandered hundreds of millions of pounds in the process of avoiding research into safe, effective, non-patentable treatments. CRUK will not fund research into therapies which are a threat to the business: The failure of cancer research is deliberate.


"A SOLUTION TO CANCER WOULD MEAN THE TERMINATION OF RESEARCH PROGRAMS, THE OBSOLESCENCE OF SKILLS, THE END OF DREAMS OF PERSONAL GLORY. TRIUMPH OVER CANCER WOULD DRY UP CONTRIBUTIONS TO SELF-PERPETUATING CHARITIES. IT WOULD MORTALLY THREATEN THE PRESENT CLINICAL ESTABLISHMENT BY RENDERING OBSOLETE THE EXPENSIVE SURGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL AND CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC TREATMENTS IN WHICH SO MUCH MONEY, TRAINING AND EQUIPMENT IS INVESTED...THE NEW THERAPY MUST BE DISBELIEVED, DENIED, DISCOURAGED AND DISALLOWED AT ALL COSTS, REGARDLLESS OF ACTUAL TESTING RESULTS AND, PREFERABLY, WITHOUT ANY TESTING AT ALL." (The Houston/Null Analysis)


* Protecting those in the fields of petrochemicals, radiation etc., who are responsible for the cancer epidemic. Not content with merely overlooking the deluge of carcinogens being created by these industries, the "Imperial Cancer Research Fund" has stated:


"One of the biggest myths in recent years is that there is a cancer epidemic caused by exposure to radiation, pollution, pesticides and food additives. The truth is that these factors have very little to do with the majority of cancers in this country."


The fact that no genuine research organisation would go out of its way to protect the main cancer-causers is completely lost of the CRUK-tee-shirted celebrity supporters, the Cycle/Race For Life disciples and the other simpletons, waving tubs in the High Street.


To keep the millions rolling into the coffers, CRUK promote the false impression that their treatments have been responsible for cancer cures. However, NO cancer victim has been restored to health, at any time, through treatments developed by CRUK. CRUK's cure hoax has two main facets: misdiagnosis and 5-year survival, passed off as "cure".


Unfortunately for CRUK, periodically, some high-profile person develops genuine cancer: King George VI, The Shah of Persia, Senator Hubert Humphrey, John Wayne, Bobby Moore, Roy Castle, Marti Caine, Dusty Springfield, Linda McCartney, King Hussein of Jordan, George Harrison, John Thaw, Alan Bates, Bob Monkhouse, and millions of others, celebrated and unknown, all chose CRUK-approved treatments: ALL R.I.P.


Cutting, radiating and poisoning some lump - cancerous or not - and then announcing "cured" after five years has nothing, whatsoever, to do with the successful treatment of the disease. The autumn 1997 edition of the Leukaemia Research News stated: "The intensive therapy given to children...can result in…intellectual impairment…heart damage, growth disorders and…second cancers."


When the patient dies more than 5 years later, from the effects of the treatment, they remain in the "cure" statistics: cured and dead at the same time.


Only therapies that are capable of restoring the immune system's defences are curative, and only imaginary cancer is being cured by orthodox treatment. Using the human body as a passive battlefield, which is invariably trashed in the process of waging a War On Cancer, has no place within the field of rational cancer treatment.


TIME FOR LITIGATION


"There will be a medical edition of the Nuremberg Trials. The atrocities now being committed in the name of orthodox medicine, the suppression of life-giving data, the needless loss of lives, mutilation of bodies and excessive suffering will not continue to be tolerated…Ultimately these criminals and their political lackeys will be brought to trial." Dr Bruce Halstead


Whilst Dr Halstead's call for criminal procedures may be optimistic, civil actions should have been taken long ago. In 1975, Prof Jones' statistics showed that the treatment was worse than useless, leading to the death of the patient.


In 1980, Dr B A Richards, in his book 'Topic of Cancer - when the killing has to stop" - the killing being the lethal treatments - wrote of the "barbarity" of the cancer orthodoxy and the question of malpractice or manslaughter.


Medical malpractice is "…improper or injurous medical or surgical treatment through carelessness, ignorance or intent…a more serious criminal lack of care arising from deliberate disregard for the care and safety of other persons constitutes manslaughter."


As the perpetrators of the orthodox cancer onslaught know precisely what they are doing, their efforts having put millions into premature graves, relatives should be pursuing civil actions against the cancer business.


Cancer is not an incurable disease; practitioners have long used nutritional and herbal therapies to restore health to the cancer victims. Clinics all around the world are successfully restoring health to patients, many of whom have been declared "terminal" after being damaged and left for dead by treatments financed, produced and promoted by the likes of "Cancer Research UK".


"…still the money pours in for 'Cancer Research' from kind-hearted, well-meaning people, in spite of the fact that the much-advertised 'cures' and 'discoveries' invariably turn out, year after year, to be no cure at all but rather an aggravation of the trouble, the proof of this being the steady increase of the disease on all sides…Surely, there should be some result to show as a partial excuse for the torturing of so many animals…the public still does not realise that nothing is likely to happen, no progress ever likely or even possible whilst the research is done on demonstrably wrong lines." Morley Steynor, 1940


Over 60 years, countless billions of pounds, animal and human deaths later, the research is still on the same useless, highly profitable lines; whilst the well-meaning, hopelessly ill-informed supporters, many of whom have lost relatives and friends, keep pouring their cash down the same "cancer research" drain responsible for their losses.


"From a scientific standpoint…'animal model systems' in cancer research have been a total failure…animal model systems not only kill animals they also kill humans. There is no good factual evidence to show that the use of animals in cancer research has led to the prevention or cure of a single human cancer." Dr Irwin D Bross PhD.


Cancer research is the flagship of vivisection, using a quarter of a million animals, in the UK alone, each year.


CANCER RESEARCH UK, THE LEUKAEMIA RESEARCH FUND, TENOVUS CANCER RESEARCH, THE YORKSHIRE CANCER RESEARCH CAMPAIGN, BREAKTHROUGH BREAST CANCER, CANCER AND LEUKAEMIA IN CHILDHOOD TRUST, THE INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH, THE WORLD CANCER RESEARCH FUND


…ALL are all totally dominated by the pharmaceutical/vivisection industry, which GUARANTEES failure and the ever-lasting need for "more research."


ESSENTIAL READING:


THE CANCER BUSINESS; 36-page booklet. Lethal treatments, fraudulent research, suppressed cures, protected carcinogens, the orthodox cure hoax, cancer survival.

 http://www.bava.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/CancerBusinesspt1.html


BREAST CANCER: information for the non-mushroom. For those not happy being kept in the dark and fed manure. 8 pages.


The cancer business is not only the biggest fraud in history, it is also the biggest killer. More people have died due to the actions and omissions of the cancer business than due to any other single cause, world wars included.


Mass-media agents, trying to pass themselves off as "medical correspondents" or "science editors", regularly supply Cancer Research Breakthroughs, which never come to anything.


False, deceptive and easily-refuted statements such as "75% of women with breast cancer are now being successfully treated" and "More people are being told 'all clear'" encourage the genuine cancer sufferer to go down the slash/bum/poison/hospice/cemetery route.


www.cancertruth.mysite.freeserve.com