Skip to content or view screen version

Baghdad vs Beirut

twoapproaches | 02.03.2005 17:42 | Anti-militarism

There's the american way: bombing a country to pieces and expecting people to become obedient vassals of the US.

two approaches
two approaches


And there's the european way: people power from London to Kiev, from Berlin to Genoa, taking to the streets to demand a better life.

Which one would you choose?

twoapproaches

Comments

Hide the following 2 comments

both the american way , actually.

04.03.2005 09:29

Surely both events orchestrated by good old Uncle (scumbag) Sam.
Name me anything that happens anywhere in the world that isn,t ?
All these pathetic "velvet" , "orange" revolutions blasted around the world by the BBC etc , all the work of the USA.
Whilst true popular revolutions such as the Cuban, Venezuelan examples are attacked by popular media , U.S. funded terrorists and attempted miltary coups.
So to the question , which do I prefer ?
I answer , anything truly popular and which the U.S. has not had its filthy , murderous hands on.

gullible

Yeah, sad really

04.03.2005 13:21

The Czechs with the 'velvet' revolution ... shying away from the hand of friendship form the Soviet Union. Wanting elections - I mean, what next? Those poor gullible people lured out on the streets by those CIA chappies ... Anybody would think that the Czechs acutally wanted to join the EU, when the Warsaw Pact was there to wrap a warm embracing arm round them [you won't remember Jan Plalach though ...]

sceptic