Censorship going WAY over the top!!
bloke | 07.02.2005 12:54
OK so it wasn't the best written article, but seeing as no-one else had bothered to do one I thought I would describe the protest.
(In summary, some anarchists turned up, some people from World Development Movement, and the samba band Rhythms of resistance).
I have looked at the editorial guidelines and I honestly can't see how the article has breached any of these guidelines.
What does "OPEN PUBLISHING" mean when you can just censor anything you don't like the look of?
This was a description of a protest. It was news. It should not have been hidden.
(In summary, some anarchists turned up, some people from World Development Movement, and the samba band Rhythms of resistance).
I have looked at the editorial guidelines and I honestly can't see how the article has breached any of these guidelines.
What does "OPEN PUBLISHING" mean when you can just censor anything you don't like the look of?
This was a description of a protest. It was news. It should not have been hidden.
bloke
Comments
Hide the following 4 comments
Suggestion
07.02.2005 19:26
.
Yes comments about why things have been hidden are good
07.02.2005 23:08
http://lists.indymedia.org/imc-uk-features
Regarding the hidden report -- this does sound like a mistake, can you identify the post by looking at the view all posts page (this lists everything in the newswire including the hidden stuff):
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/viewallposts.html
IMC'er
censorship is censorship
08.02.2005 09:27
Apparently, it doesn't matter that those with sight problems can't read these articles as well as those with good eyes - this is not discrimination nor a heirachical response to information.
Head in the sand.
Nobody censors speech they agree with.
... seen the way this movie ends ...
Meet the new media, same as the old media.
jackslucid
e-mail: jackslucid@hotmail.com
Sometimes it takes a while
08.02.2005 11:47
Voluntary Slave