Yes, Kerry Won.
observer | 26.12.2004 15:57 | Analysis | Social Struggles
If you haven't been following John Kerry closely, get ready to hear of surprising developments. The vote-defrauded, potential president-in-waiting has just indicated through his lawyer that the validity of George Bush's reelection is no longer a given.
observer
Comments
Hide the following 4 comments
Yawn
29.12.2004 15:48
Forget stolen votes. If Kerry couldn't get 99% against George W Bush then he deserved to loose.
Why would people reward Kerry with an election victory when he offerd them nothing different to Bush?
People that supported the Kerry candidacy need to look reality in the face for the first time and think hard about why their strategy to remove Bush failed so badly.
Are you listening Michael Moore?
ezcvfsqawg
Hold on a minute...
29.12.2004 23:28
Regards,
Phil.
Philip Hucknall
Please explain
31.12.2004 09:49
I’d like to give you this opportunity to explain how Kerry is different to Bush. You left that out of your post :-)
I think the “anyone but Bush” strategy that you subscribe to is the negation of democracy. Because it accepts, completely, that the only choice is between identical candidates.
If the energy that was wasted by much of the American Left who broke ranks and backed Kerry was thrown behind candidates that challenged this farce it would do more to advance democracy than a hundred recounts or a thousand Democratic victories.
ezcvfsqawg
Please explain
31.12.2004 09:49
I’d like to give you this opportunity to explain how Kerry is different to Bush. You left that out of your post :-)
I think the “anyone but Bush” strategy that you subscribe to is the negation of democracy. Because it accepts, completely, that the only choice is between identical candidates.
If the energy that was wasted by much of the American Left who broke ranks and backed Kerry was thrown behind candidates that challenged this farce it would do more to advance democracy than a hundred recounts or a thousand Democratic victories.
ezcvfsqawg