Skip to content or view screen version

UK Medical Textbook Must Delete "Gay Bowel Syndrome"

Michael Petrelis | 19.12.2004 01:38 | Health | Cambridge | London

"Gay Bowel Syndrome" Must Be Deleted from UK Medical Textbook

PLEASE REPOST AND SHARE WIDELY


(A copy of this message is being sent to the UK's premier queer activist, Peter Tatchell. If anyone across the pond can exert some influence over this UK medical guide, he can.  peter@tatchell.freeserve.co.uk )



 http://www.mpetrelis.blogspot.com/



December 18, 2004

GPnotebook.co.uk
c/o Dr Damian C. Crowther
The Cambridge Institute for Medical Research
Hills Road
Cambridge, UK, CB2 2XY

Dear Dr. Crowther:

Your advice to general practioners in the United Kingdom regarding the fictious "gay bowel syndrome" must not be allowed to stand unchallenged.

To the point, this supposed medical syndrome was debunked decades ago and unfortunately still shows up in otherwise respectable medical journals, including your GP Notebook.

I ask that you forthwith remove the listing in the GP Notebook for "gay bowel syndrome." Frankly, anything less smacks of homophobic quackery.

An apology to the gay male community would also be most welcomed and appreciated.

Below are the link to the offensive GP Notebook listing, the text of the listing, and a story from 2001 about a Canadian medical society correcting its textbook regarding "gay bowel syndrome."

I look forward to prompt action on your part to remove "gay bowel syndrome" from your GP Notebook and issue an apology over its inclusion in your textbook.

Sincrely,
Michael Petrelis
San Francisco, CA
 MPetrelis@aol.com
Ph: 1-415-621-6267


-

 http://www.gayhealth.com/templates/1103405738716761071234/news?record=512&trycookie=1

‘Gay Bowel Syndrome’ Struck from Textbook
by Jon Garbo

Monday, April 16th 2001


A gay activist scored a victory against the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG), which last month deleted any reference to "gay bowel syndrome" from its medical textbook, the Southern Voice reported on April 12. The authors used the syndrome to describe a parasitic infection of the intestines that is prevalent among gay men who engage in anal-oral contact (rimming). However, the infection is by no means exclusive to gay men.

It is very much a defamation to say ‘gay bowel syndrome,’ when what they’re really talking about is parasites," said activist Michael Petrelis, who discovered the textbook entry. "It just seems so wacky and outrageous that in 2001 these educated medical people are still believing that ‘gay bowel syndrome’ exists."

"Gay bowel syndrome" is an outdated term from the 1980’s that appeared accidentally in the textbook, First Principles of Gastroenterology: The Basis of Disease and An Approach to Management,according to a CAG official. "It slipped into this [edition] purely by accident," said Dr. Eldon Shaffer, head of the Department of Medicine at the University of Calgary and the textbook’s co-author. "I didn’t even know it was still in there; I had to find it… It’s gone."

While gay men may be more at risk than heterosexual men for the parasites, it’s still harmful to label the condition as a gay one, agreed Gay Men’s Health Crisis’ communications manager, Marty Algaze. "Sickle cell anemia is primarily seen in African Americans, but would you call it African American anemia? People would never accept that," he said.

-



 http://www.gpnotebook.co.uk/cache/-603586526.htm

and

 http://www.gpnotebook.co.uk/simplepage.cfm?ID=-603586526

gay bowel syndrome


This term refers to a collection of sexually transmitted enteric infections in HIV infected homosexuals.

The infective organisms include: Shigella, Giardia, Campylobacter-like organisms, Entamoeba, Chlamydia, gonorrhoea and syphilis.



The information provided herein should not be used for diagnosis or treatment of any medical condition. A licensed medical practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions. Copyright 2003 Oxbridge Solutions Ltd®. Any distribution or duplication of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Oxbridge Solutions Ltd® is an independent company owned by the authors which does not receive income from any other organisation or individual.

Michael Petrelis
- e-mail: Mpetrrelis@aol.com
- Homepage: http://www.mpetrelis.blogspot.com

Comments

Hide the following 8 comments

typical

19.12.2004 10:47

Typical homosexuals trying to rewrite biology to suit their own ends. If the disease's victims are virtually all gay then trying to pretend that it has no link to homosexuality is akin to burying your head in the sand. The fact is, on average, homosexuals die earlier, and are more prone to a whole host of STIs, some of which virtually only affect gays. It is a dangerous lifestyle and renaming conditions won't change that!

LocalGP


Typical?

19.12.2004 17:51

Surely it makes no sense to label a medical condition as 'gay' unless you have a homophobic political agenda (which 'Local GP' clearly seems to have). There are all kinds of conditions which impact on certain groups within the population more than others which are not labelled with specific reference to that group.

The above comment states that "It is a dangerous lifestyle and renaming conditions won't change that!" Presumably Local GP is in favour of labelling medical conditions as 'gay' to protect all those young men who might be contaminated with homosexuality if they're aren't made aware of the risks of that 'lifestyle'. What narrow minded, intolerant bullshit.

Perhaps if it wasn't for such draconian attitudes we could have decent sex education for all and lower the numbers sexually transmitted infections among people of all sexual orientations.

If the above contributer really is a working Doctor, it just goes to show how far we still have to go to rid society of institutional homophobia.

Poon


The NHS

19.12.2004 19:55

I am very pleased to report the web site for the National Health Service does not list this supposed syndrome as a genuine ailment. Check out  http://www.nhsdirect.nhs.uk/ because after you do a search for "gay bowel syndrome" you will see nothing turns up.

Michael Petrelis
mail e-mail: mpetrelis@aol.com
- Homepage: http://www.mpetrelis.blogspot.com


BMA

19.12.2004 20:22

Hi Poon. Good post.

I doubt that "LocalGP" is a practicing medical doctor. The British Medical Association is a broadly progressive organisation which takes a dim view of the damage caused by anti-gay quackery. (And, I might add, a robust critic of neoliberal economic policy in healthcare). The Association has recently been looking at the relationship between gay people and the medical profession in a comprehensive report which was published in November.

One can only assume - for it is notably without references - that the medical evidence "LocalGP" cites to allege that homosexuals die earlier than heterosexuals is the now discredited theses by Dr Paul Cameron, an American physician who was found to have falsified and fabricated his evidence in order to promote his case. He was later found to be in the employ of the extreme right and struck off for gross malpractice, although the false reportage does occasionally still get quoted by less sophistiacted anti-gay campaigners.

More on Cameron is at www.exgaywatch.com , which keeps a regularly updated analysis of those groups who claim that gays are disordered.

Indpendent Left


Clarification and Correction

21.12.2004 00:52

I'm not quite sure what the King Ando (above) is on about, but I suspect it is something to do with the approach of pagan, neo-pagan and Wiccan religious traditions to gay people. A few years back I used to live above a couple who were local organisers for the Pagan Federation and pretty well up on the various traditions. They told me that there were in fact even fewer grounds for anti-gay tenets in their religion than in the large monotheistic ones. All the pagan organisations have no problems with gay people. This is actually particularly true of goddess religions, which have a strong tradition of encompassing sexual and gender minorities and were very much linked to some schools of radical feminist activism in the past.

As for the reference to anal sex (only 7 inches?) it is of course worth pointing out that significant numbers of heterosexual couples enjoy this, and conversely, a lot of gay men don't.

Yuletide Greetings

Caz

P.S. I believe there's a Queer Pagan Group which is an affiliate of the Pagan Federation but I'm not sure what their web address is. It might be listed in Pagan Dawn, Kindred Spirit or similar magazines that you can find stocked in most alternative bookstores.

Indpendent Left


NB

21.12.2004 05:35

NB. The posting to which Caz refers has since been removed since it breached Indymedia reporting standards.

Gay Lad


Update

21.12.2004 20:12

 http://mpetrelis.blogspot.com/


December 20, 2004

GPnotebook.co.uk
c/o Dr Damian C. Crowther
The Cambridge Institute for Medical Research
Hills Road
Cambridge, UK, CB2 2XY

Dear Dr. Crowther:
I see that you've posted the following note on your web site about "gay bowel syndrome:"

>>This was a term that was previously used to refer to a collection of sexually transmitted enteric infections in HIV infected homosexuals (1)

>>The infective organisms included in this "syndrome": Shigella, Giardia, Campylobacter-like organisms, Entamoeba, Chlamydia, gonorrhoea and syphilis.

>>Note however that although that "...Through analysis of biomedical discourse and popular media, it is apparent that Gay Bowel Syndrome is an essentialized category of difference that is neither gay-specific, confined to the bowel, nor a syndrome.." (2). Thus its inclusion as a term in GPnotebook is really as a means of pointing out that the syndrome is not a valid clinical or diagnostic entity. (Source:  http://www.gpnotebook.co.uk/simplepage.cfm?ID=-603586526)

While the note is a step in the right direction, I still question why the GP Notebook includes any reference to what you yourselves acknowledge is not specific to gay men, confined to the bowel and not a syndrome.

Since this alleged syndrome is not a valid medical condition, why mention it at all?

Again, I ask you to remove "gay bowel syndrome" from the GP Notebook.

Sincerely,

Michael Petrelis

San Francisco, CA, USA

 MPetrelis@aol.com

Ph: 415-621-6267


Michael Petrelis
mail e-mail: mpetrelis@aol.com


Update

21.12.2004 20:14

 http://mpetrelis.blogspot.com/


December 20, 2004

GPnotebook.co.uk
c/o Dr Damian C. Crowther
The Cambridge Institute for Medical Research
Hills Road
Cambridge, UK, CB2 2XY

Dear Dr. Crowther:
I see that you've posted the following note on your web site about "gay bowel syndrome:"

>>This was a term that was previously used to refer to a collection of sexually transmitted enteric infections in HIV infected homosexuals (1)

>>The infective organisms included in this "syndrome": Shigella, Giardia, Campylobacter-like organisms, Entamoeba, Chlamydia, gonorrhoea and syphilis.

>>Note however that although that "...Through analysis of biomedical discourse and popular media, it is apparent that Gay Bowel Syndrome is an essentialized category of difference that is neither gay-specific, confined to the bowel, nor a syndrome.." (2). Thus its inclusion as a term in GPnotebook is really as a means of pointing out that the syndrome is not a valid clinical or diagnostic entity. (Source:  http://www.gpnotebook.co.uk/simplepage.cfm?ID=-603586526)

While the note is a step in the right direction, I still question why the GP Notebook includes any reference to what you yourselves acknowledge is not specific to gay men, confined to the bowel and not a syndrome.

Since this alleged syndrome is not a valid medical condition, why mention it at all?

Again, I ask you to remove "gay bowel syndrome" from the GP Notebook.

Sincerely,

Michael Petrelis

San Francisco, CA, USA

 MPetrelis@aol.com

Ph: 415-621-6267


Michael Petrelis
mail e-mail: mpetrelis@aol.com