Skip to content or view screen version

Blair Rules Out Iraq Civilian Death Toll Probe

di | 10.12.2004 06:52

Tony Blair rejected a call Wednesday for an independent inquiry into the civilian death toll in the U.S.-led war in Iraq.



The call came in an open letter to the premier made available to Reuters and signed by over 40 diplomats, peers, scientists and churchmen.

Any totaling of the Iraqi civilian war dead could embarrass Blair ahead of a general election expected next May [2005] in a country that mostly opposed the U.S.- led war.

Britain and the United States have suffered around 1,070 military losses in the war since it began in March 2003 but the countrywide casualty count is not known. [Website note: this figure, already a baffling under-estimate, does not include casualties to the "civilian contractors" and other coalition forces in Iraq, or the 25,000 seriously injured occupying troops.]

Blair, however, said he saw no need for an inquiry.

"Figures from the Iraqi Ministry of Health, which are a survey from the hospitals there, are in our view the most accurate survey there is," he told parliament.
[Website note: How absurd. How many Iraqi civilians obligingly went to hospital before dying?.]

Defense Minister Geoff Hoon, visiting British troops in the southern Iraqi city of Basra, stressed that Iraqis themselves were best placed to get the necessary data.

"We want the Iraqi authorities to be in a position to provide that information so that we can all have an accurate picture of what is going on," he told BBC radio.

Iraq's health ministry has said 3,853 civilians were killed between April and October this year but critics say the lack of figures for the previous period makes a full tally imperative.

The signatories urged Blair to commission an urgent probe and keep counting so long as British soldiers were in Iraq.

"Your government is obliged under international humanitarian law to protect the civilian population during military operations in Iraq, and you have consistently promised to do so," they wrote in the letter.
"However, without counting the dead and injured, no one can know whether Britain and its coalition partners are meeting these obligations."

Signatories included Air Marshal Sir Timothy Garden, who spent 32 years in the military; Sir Stephen Egerton, a former British ambassador to Iraq; human rights campaigner Bianca Jagger and the Bishop of Oxford Richard Harris.

In a report released in October by the Lancet medical journal, days before the U.S. election that returned President Bush to power, a group of American scientists put civilian deaths at 100,000.

But the Iraq Body Count (IBC) -- an Anglo-American research group tracking civilian deaths via numerous sources -- has come up with a much lower figure of about 14,000-16,000

di

Comments

Hide the following 5 comments

good

10.12.2004 10:46

We don't really care about the iraqui deads anyway, I am more concerned about unemployment in the UK

uin


BBC post-Hutton

10.12.2004 14:46

Jagger came on 5 live last night to tell us about it. Every awkward question she was asked made it obvious that the Beeb didn't want to know.

Then to follow... a cute n fluffy piece about little No-Arms Ali and how happy he is
that his Mum, Dad and thirteen other family members were blown to bits. The Beeb LOVED him!

It was at that point I switched off my radio in raging anger. Shame. I usually like to drift off to sleep to it..




minion


We ??????

10.12.2004 19:09

we dont really care?
Are u actually speaking for anyone else? or are you merely just so self absorbed that you persume you are.
i understand you are a pointless troll, and as a rule i dont normally bother a reply, but i hate with a passion self centred twats who seem to think they speak for more than themselves (like politicians).
Unemployement in the uk maybe a problem but more than the deaths of innocent men,women and children? i personally dont think so.

fight the bosses not their wars (A)

(A)


Perhaps its a Royal "We" or good cannon fodder

11.12.2004 10:35

perhaps it's a we like as in Royal, but more than likely just good old Cannon fodder, if "one" is really looking for a employmeny I suggest "one" pops down to the local army recruitment center. A spot of square bashing and "one"should be ready to take part in phoney the Lion hearted's next Crusade to liberate the Iranians. better known as the War on Iran, unless of course one ends up in Deepcut, which wouldn't be a bad solution as one is obviously well suited. It will not take one very long to suss out that the british government couldn't give a toss about it's own
troops, except when there's a photo op' or similar ..

Sheeple


Stupid troll

12.12.2004 11:37

And all with British unemployment at its lowest for 30 years. Even a troll should pick its distractions carefully.

Duh