Slimy Lawson-Cruttendon peddles his wares to Newchurch
Advocate | 01.12.2004 00:08
The Times Online December 01, 2004
Village demands exclusion zone to keep animal rights protesters at bay
By Nicola Woolcock and Ingrid Mansell
Village demands exclusion zone to keep animal rights protesters at bay
By Nicola Woolcock and Ingrid Mansell
AN ENTIRE community has applied for an unprecedented injunction against animal rights extremists after a vicious campaign of intimidation that has included the theft of an elderly woman’s corpse.
The move comes days after an arson attack on another company listed on an animal rights group’s website. The premises of International Product Supplies, in Wellingham, Norfolk, were firebombed on Friday night.
Activists have relentlessly targeted Newchurch guinea-pig farm in Yoxall, East Staffordshire, which is run by Chris Hall and his family. In the most recent attack, the remains of Mr Hall’s mother-in-law, Gladys Hammond, 82, were stolen from her grave.
The family is following the lead of Oxford University and Huntingdon Life Sciences by applying for a protest-free exclusion zone around their property. Their case will be heard tomorrow at the High Court. But for the first time, the community has rallied behind a company seeking a court order of this kind by adding an application for its own injunction to protect the parishes surrounding the farm.
Peter Clamp, who runs a haulage business, is bringing the injunction on behalf of the villagers of Yoxall, Newchurch and Newborough, where he lives. If successful, the joint exclusion zone will be one of the largest granted, covering seven parishes and an area of nearly 30 square kilometres. Mr Clamp, who is also a parish councillor, said that members of the community were the victims of terrorism and had been left terrified by protesters. “This country needs someone to stand up against these minority protesters and I’m part of the injunction as a resident of the community,” he said.
“The residents need a spokesperson. Enough is enough. The police have given me support and said there could be ramifications, but I’m prepared for that. I’m not a soft touch and won’t be intimidated by anyone, and I’m not going to tolerate this sort of behaviour.
“I’m sick and tired of people being threatened. Over the past five years, residents have had explosions in fields and paint thrown over roads. Normal people going about their everyday business are frightened and intimidated.”
No one has been prosecuted for the desecration of Mrs Hammond’s grave, although two men were arrested and released without charge.
Mr Clamp, 50, who has lived in Newborough for 20 years, described himself as an acquaintance of the Hall family.
He said: “After the disruption of the grave I took the decision to do something about it. When the desecration happened, I’d never seen so much support from people for the victims of what they saw as an outrageous act. This can’t go on any longer. We need a large exclusion zone because some residents live in very remote areas. I’ve had a lot of support from everyone — all who have contacted me have given me 100 per cent support.”
Tim Lawson-Cruttendon, the solicitor-advocate who represented Oxford University and Huntingdon Life Sciences, has taken on the Hall family’s case.
The main defendant named on the High Court papers is the action group Stop Newchurch Guinea Pigs. But Mr Lawson-Cruttendon said that the application would also be brought against Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (Shac), Speak (which lobbied against a new research laboratory in Oxford) and the Animal Liberation Front, on the ground that they were also allegedly involved in demonstrations in Newchurch.
He said: “Unusually, the claimants include a representative member of the community and that person is seeking a representative order which will protect the entire community. The exclusion zone we are seeking is about 28.5 square kilometres and broadly covers three parishes. If we obtain this order we will have built on what we gained for Oxford — that is, protection for an entire community against the excesses of animal rights enthusiasm.” Mr Lawson-Cruttendon is bringing the case under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, which was originally drafted to shield women from stalkers.
Huntingdon Life Sciences was the first company to use the legislation to obtain an injunction against animal rights protesters. Shac names International Product Supplies on the “Blood on their hands” section of its website, saying that the company “supplies Newchurch Guinea Pig Farm who supply HLS. Contact IPS and voice your disgust at their involvement with HLS.”
Source:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1382578,00.html
Save the Newchurch Guinea Pigs (SNGP): http://www.liberation-now.org
The move comes days after an arson attack on another company listed on an animal rights group’s website. The premises of International Product Supplies, in Wellingham, Norfolk, were firebombed on Friday night.
Activists have relentlessly targeted Newchurch guinea-pig farm in Yoxall, East Staffordshire, which is run by Chris Hall and his family. In the most recent attack, the remains of Mr Hall’s mother-in-law, Gladys Hammond, 82, were stolen from her grave.
The family is following the lead of Oxford University and Huntingdon Life Sciences by applying for a protest-free exclusion zone around their property. Their case will be heard tomorrow at the High Court. But for the first time, the community has rallied behind a company seeking a court order of this kind by adding an application for its own injunction to protect the parishes surrounding the farm.
Peter Clamp, who runs a haulage business, is bringing the injunction on behalf of the villagers of Yoxall, Newchurch and Newborough, where he lives. If successful, the joint exclusion zone will be one of the largest granted, covering seven parishes and an area of nearly 30 square kilometres. Mr Clamp, who is also a parish councillor, said that members of the community were the victims of terrorism and had been left terrified by protesters. “This country needs someone to stand up against these minority protesters and I’m part of the injunction as a resident of the community,” he said.
“The residents need a spokesperson. Enough is enough. The police have given me support and said there could be ramifications, but I’m prepared for that. I’m not a soft touch and won’t be intimidated by anyone, and I’m not going to tolerate this sort of behaviour.
“I’m sick and tired of people being threatened. Over the past five years, residents have had explosions in fields and paint thrown over roads. Normal people going about their everyday business are frightened and intimidated.”
No one has been prosecuted for the desecration of Mrs Hammond’s grave, although two men were arrested and released without charge.
Mr Clamp, 50, who has lived in Newborough for 20 years, described himself as an acquaintance of the Hall family.
He said: “After the disruption of the grave I took the decision to do something about it. When the desecration happened, I’d never seen so much support from people for the victims of what they saw as an outrageous act. This can’t go on any longer. We need a large exclusion zone because some residents live in very remote areas. I’ve had a lot of support from everyone — all who have contacted me have given me 100 per cent support.”
Tim Lawson-Cruttendon, the solicitor-advocate who represented Oxford University and Huntingdon Life Sciences, has taken on the Hall family’s case.
The main defendant named on the High Court papers is the action group Stop Newchurch Guinea Pigs. But Mr Lawson-Cruttendon said that the application would also be brought against Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (Shac), Speak (which lobbied against a new research laboratory in Oxford) and the Animal Liberation Front, on the ground that they were also allegedly involved in demonstrations in Newchurch.
He said: “Unusually, the claimants include a representative member of the community and that person is seeking a representative order which will protect the entire community. The exclusion zone we are seeking is about 28.5 square kilometres and broadly covers three parishes. If we obtain this order we will have built on what we gained for Oxford — that is, protection for an entire community against the excesses of animal rights enthusiasm.” Mr Lawson-Cruttendon is bringing the case under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, which was originally drafted to shield women from stalkers.
Huntingdon Life Sciences was the first company to use the legislation to obtain an injunction against animal rights protesters. Shac names International Product Supplies on the “Blood on their hands” section of its website, saying that the company “supplies Newchurch Guinea Pig Farm who supply HLS. Contact IPS and voice your disgust at their involvement with HLS.”
Source:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1382578,00.html Save the Newchurch Guinea Pigs (SNGP):
http://www.liberation-now.org
Advocate
Comments
Hide the following 2 comments
A good example
01.12.2004 08:03
Paul Edwards
enough dirty tricks yet...
01.12.2004 14:53
It is also very interesting to see that 80% of the work on the evidence and documentation in support of the injunction has been done by the police. So a good waste of taxpayer's money from the utterly biased coppers Insp David Bird and PC Mark Rushton there. This injunction has the aim of stopping all legal protest only, even though it has been brough in, under the guise of stopping illegal protest. Regardless of what people feel about the digging up of Gladys Hammond, that event is not an excuse to deprive people of their right to legal protest through the backdoor of the civil courts as is now being done. THIS AFFECTS EVERYONE!
And for those who have heard on the news that a 62 year old woman has just been arrested for the digging up of Gladys Knight, well how convenient as well as how ridiculous. She is recovering from cancer! Something Insp Bird stepped over the mark by stating in his witness statement for this repressive injunction, that she shouldnt have made that choice.
Anyone who knows her, will say that digging up Mrs Hammond is the last thing she would ever do, as well as hardly being capable of it. She is however, a very dedicted protestor against Newchurch guineapig farm and exercises her democratic right to protest there most weeks.
No, the sole reason, this woman has been arrested is that the next hearing for this particular injunction is tomorrow, Thursday, and the police want to blacken the name of a dedicated but innocent activist as they see the expression of dissent as a crime in itself. This is classic example of manipulation of press and courts by a state which is scared of freedom of expression.
FreedomToProtest
e-mail:
freedomtoprotest@doond.com