Blair: Traitor and War Criminal
progressivebrit | 21.11.2004 15:23
By June 2003, after the mainstream media had begun to do its duty and reported on some of the inconcistencies in the arguments offered on both side of the Atlantic for attacking Iraq widespread legal opinion was that the invasion of Iraq was illegal. By November 2003, even a so called "hawk" loyal to the Bush regime, Richard Perle stated that the US breached international law when it decided to invade Iraq.
(full article at http://logicvoice.blogspot.com/2004_11_01_logicvoice_archive.html)
By June 2003, after the mainstream media had begun to do its duty and reported on some of the inconcistencies in the arguments offered on both side of the Atlantic for attacking Iraq widespread legal opinion was that the invasion of Iraq was illegal. By November 2003, even a so called "hawk" loyal to the Bush regime, Richard Perle stated that the US breached international law when it decided to invade Iraq. By September 2004, Kofi Annan, the UN chief stated what the majority of people around the world also believed, that the invasion of Iraq was illegal.
Britain has signed up to the International Criminal Court, however the US under the rogue regime has not. The Bush regime believed that they should not be subject to international law or any prosecutions for human rights violations carried out in Iraq. By this stance alone, Blair should have said no to Bush. Blair has now subjected not only himself to possible prosecution for war crimes, but also the British troops.
Blair has through his deceit created a dangerous situation where if there was a real threat to this countrys interests, if he were to try to inform the British people of that threat he would not be believed. (And is there any wonder?) Blair needs to be impeached in the interests of British national security.
Please support the campaign to impeach Blair. Visit www.impeachblair.org to find out how you can help.
By June 2003, after the mainstream media had begun to do its duty and reported on some of the inconcistencies in the arguments offered on both side of the Atlantic for attacking Iraq widespread legal opinion was that the invasion of Iraq was illegal. By November 2003, even a so called "hawk" loyal to the Bush regime, Richard Perle stated that the US breached international law when it decided to invade Iraq. By September 2004, Kofi Annan, the UN chief stated what the majority of people around the world also believed, that the invasion of Iraq was illegal.
Britain has signed up to the International Criminal Court, however the US under the rogue regime has not. The Bush regime believed that they should not be subject to international law or any prosecutions for human rights violations carried out in Iraq. By this stance alone, Blair should have said no to Bush. Blair has now subjected not only himself to possible prosecution for war crimes, but also the British troops.
Blair has through his deceit created a dangerous situation where if there was a real threat to this countrys interests, if he were to try to inform the British people of that threat he would not be believed. (And is there any wonder?) Blair needs to be impeached in the interests of British national security.
Please support the campaign to impeach Blair. Visit www.impeachblair.org to find out how you can help.
progressivebrit
Homepage:
http://logicvoice.blogspot.com
Comments
Display the following comment