Skip to content or view screen version

Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

hiding posts

concerned | 11.11.2004 12:49

censorship?

I posted a link to a BBC report on the situation on refugee camps in Darfur. Agreed, it was just a link, to draw attention to the problem. But then many articles are just repeats of newswire material. SO why was this one hidden? It did refer to what was described as the world's humanitarian crisis.

And the link was:  http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3496731.stm

concerned

Comments

Hide the following 2 comments

Q&A: Sudan's Darfur conflict

11.11.2004 13:46

if it was just a link im not surprised it was hidden you need to put s'thing about what the links are !
as in
The world's worst humanitarian crisis is unfolding in Sudan's western region of Darfur, the United Nations says.
More than 1.5 million people have fled their homes and some 70,000 people have been killed. Pro-government Arab militias are accused of ethnic cleansing and even genocide against the region's black African population.

zcat


yes, i know; theyve been at it since they first started

11.11.2004 14:28

this partic indy site has been one of the worst for cutting out articles, for various reasons. at first they were antagonistic toward work coming from "trot" heirarchical " organizations, mostly marxist. of course, this behaviour raises echoes of stalinism, and only later did they permit posts by the useless SWP (which actually helped to EXPOSE the SWP for the vapid duplicitious group it is!).
i really thought theyd learned the lesson; still, there ye go

thuk oplok