Skip to content or view screen version

The Freedom of Information Act 2000 and TfL

Marcus | 25.10.2004 13:21 | London

The Freedom of Information Act 2000 extends the public's right to access information held by public authorities. One organisation that falls under the act is TfL, which manages public transport within London. When the act comes fully into force on January 1st 2005, TfL may be forced to release some information that it has covertly recorded about its users' movements.

Anyone who lives in London and uses public transport will be familiar with the electronic Oystercards, which have replaced the old monthly and annual season tickets. Users of the new cards are able to quickly swipe in and out of ticket gates by waving their wallets across the machines. Meanwhile, behind the scenes, TfL is silently monitoring the movements of all Oystercard users, keeping an extensive log of where people have been and at what time. At present, individual Oystercard users can view a record of their own movements at machines installed in most stations. Anyone who makes unusual use of their card will receive a stern letter explaining how to use it correctly. TfL has therefore made it quite clear that it is performing mass surveillance within the city, which it claims will reduce the number of people evading fares, and subsequently improve the transport service.

While the new Freedom of Information Act will require TfL to publish the majority of information that it holds, there are, of course, some exemptions. Most significantly, TfL will not be able to distribute any material that is covered by the Data Protection Act. For now, the precise movements of individual commuters in London should be known *only* to TfL and its relevant subsidiaries, the security forces, including the police and the military, the Government, and the Queen.

What will be interesting to see is whether or not TfL are prepared to publish accurate logs of journey times within the city. This will finally provide a reliable means with which to assess the performance of the transport system. Although TfL presently publishes estimated journey times for each of its lines, these are often wildly overoptimistic and clearly do not take into account the length of time that travelers spend waiting on platforms. It could be extremely embarrassing for the London Underground to reveal that journeys did in practice take considerably longer than they claimed. Perhaps TfL, and other authorities, will be reluctant to keep such accurate records if their performance is put so clearly on display.


TfL says nothing about the surveillance of travelers on its own web site, but the following resources give some background to the current system, the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and government policy:



From Mayor's Question Time 17/9/2003:

Roger Evans: ...you might try to scrap weekly and monthly travelcards and replace them entirely with the Oyster Card pay-as-you-go system. Can you assure Londoners that travelcards are safe?

Ken Livingstone: I would veto such a suggestion because I think there will always be some people – a small minority – who for ideological reasons will not want to use the Oyster Card because they will think it is an intrusion into their liberty and so on because it has this small radio receiver

... then later in the session:

Ken Livingstone: It is my intention to try and get virtually every Londoner to use the Oyster Card...



From the London Project Report, Prime Minister's Strategy

Unit, July 2004:

We recommend that... Government should continue to work with TfL to exploit the full potential of the Oyster smartcard ticketing system, and to improve the quality and accessibility of travel information.



 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3121652.stm
 http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/foi/index.shtml
 http://www.oystercard.com/
 http://www.spy.org.uk/spyblog/archives/000056.html

Marcus

Comments

Display the following comment

  1. Remember TfL is run by an ex CIA man — Anonymous ex emploryee of LUL