Skip to content or view screen version

Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

So-Called Mental Illness is Myth Masquerading As Science--new book will rock you

anti-psychiatric liberation affront! | 21.10.2004 23:42 | Analysis | Health | Repression | World

This dialogue between Dr. Szasz and his critics allows him to once again articulate the argument he has presented so brilliantly and passionately for over four decades. . . . A profession that fails to learn from and respect those who confront it with controversial and discomforting ideas loses strength and vibrancy. Hopefully, at least some younger psychiatrists will be encouraged to read this book. They will find that their intellectual and professional lives will be enriched.

_Szasz Under Fire: The Psychiatric Abolitionist Faces His Critics_

Edited by Jeffrey A. Schaler

OPEN COURT PUBLISHERS
Chicago, Illinois
Distributed by Publishers Group West
ISBN 0-8126-9568-2
472 pages

Since he published The Myth of Mental Illness in 1961, Thomas Szasz has been a provocative and polarizing figure, bitterly denounced by some, lovingly defended by others, simultaneously baffling, exasperating, and entertaining to many.

In Szasz Under Fire, thirteen outstanding writers criticize Szasz's ideas on specific issues such as the reality of mental illness, physician-assisted suicide, addiction, and the insanity defense. Szasz replies to each criticism in detail, with his famous clarity, forcefulness, and occasional acerbity. Szasz Under Fire includes the first published autobiographical essay by Szasz and a complete bibliography of his writings.

The foremost opponent of psychiatric dogma, psychiatric practice, and the hubris of politicized medicine, Szasz has argued passionately and knowledgeably against compulsory commitment of the mentally ill, against the war on drugs, against the insanity defense in criminal trials, against the "diseasing" of addiction and homosexuality, and for the right to suicide.

His books include Sex by Prescription (1980), The Untamed Tongue (1990), Our Right to Drugs (1992), Cruel Compassion (1994), Fatal Freedom (1999), Pharmacracy (2001), and Liberation by Oppression (2002).

[Click here for high-resolution digital photograph of Szasz.]

"Anyone who has ever had qualms about the state giving psychiatrists the power to use drugs and civil commitment to control its citizens on the basis of 'mental illness' will be deeply rewarded by this stellar intellectual performance by Szasz, who not only holds his liberty-centered ground, but often gains more in direct and sometimes brutally frank responses to his critics and would-be reshapers of his life's work."

-GEORGE J. ANNAS
Professor and Chair, Department of Health, Bioethics, and Human Rights, Boston University School of Public Health, and author of The Rights of Patients

original link:
 http://www.schaler.net/suf.html

Discuss this and related issues now:
 http://www.boards2go.com/boards/board.cgi?action=read&id=1098404444&user=DBDouble

or, go to the general forum:
 http://www.boards2go.com/boards/board.cgi?action=read&id=1098404444&user=DBDouble

anti-psychiatric liberation affront!
- Homepage: http://www.schaler.net/suf.html

Comments

Hide the following comment

Roll a dice?

22.10.2004 00:12

( according to me ) This depends what you mean by "science", and/or what constitutes legitimate "science" considering the cultural history of science/ paradigm shifts in "thinking", corporate sponsorship of "science" ( ie. it's economic base/power relationships - delete according to philosophy ), hypethetico induction technique, nature vs nature vs lucrative academic book deals. etc etc.

Though, from experiencd of ex-collegues, plenty of psychiatrist and psychologists abuse their power ( the ones I know make terrible bloody parents sending them off to boarding school, nannies, watch tv while I work etc. etc... ) and are frequently certifiable if to be judged using their own criteria.

Poillution, Cultural, diet, accidental/historical factors all have a part to play in the concept of what may be termedlumped in with conditions that are diverse and not necessarily particularly related such as "schizophrenia", "mental illness", "neurosis", "egotism", "anti-social behaviour", "extreme selfishness", "deviance", "exhibitionism", "shyness" etc etc etc etc. ad theory infinitum.

Why thing we can all be sure on. No fucker can explain "Being" outside of the language we all inhabit. We can try and help each other in this crazy " civilization (discuss that bloody word!) But we exist and if you try and bang your head any further you WILL HIT BEDROCK in amire of metaphysical crap 8-).

VIVA la revolution and don't let the bastards grind you down!

Foucault's Care In The Community disaster