the storming of the palace
still laughing | 17.10.2004 10:52
That was one of the most empty and pathetic excuses for politics I have ever witnessed.
150 people (200 if you really want) decide to undemocratically, hierachically and in an authoritarian (top down) way disprut an anti capitlalist meeting involving 20,000 plus people from around the world.
It was not as reported on Indymedia "A spontaneous demonstration of about 250 people". It was announcd on Indymedia three days ago (you cant "organise" a spontaneous demo three days in advance".
It was a hissy fit, a tantrum, a performance and a farce.
The audience was not 'appreciative". They were bemused, confused and largely indiffent to this banal behaviour.
Like a grain of sand imagining it is the beach, 150 brave souls battled machine gun fire and enemy bombardment to storm the Palace and tell us who the real anticapitalists are (them).
So they marched up to the top of the hill (and the thousands of anticapitatlists), prevented a meeting to discuss stoping Fascism in Europe, had a little strop and marched back down the hill–and away from the real movement.
The Roma gypsies who were going to speak were especially pleased to see a bunch of masked up men in Black (wearing regulation fetish gear of ski masks) wreck their meeting. It made them feel right at home.
So 150 (or 200 if you must) vs 20,000. At least the grand old duke of York had ten thousand men.
But if you wanted to prove that you really are a bunch of sad and bitter Billy No Mates you did a very very good job.
150 people (200 if you really want) decide to undemocratically, hierachically and in an authoritarian (top down) way disprut an anti capitlalist meeting involving 20,000 plus people from around the world.
It was not as reported on Indymedia "A spontaneous demonstration of about 250 people". It was announcd on Indymedia three days ago (you cant "organise" a spontaneous demo three days in advance".
It was a hissy fit, a tantrum, a performance and a farce.
The audience was not 'appreciative". They were bemused, confused and largely indiffent to this banal behaviour.
Like a grain of sand imagining it is the beach, 150 brave souls battled machine gun fire and enemy bombardment to storm the Palace and tell us who the real anticapitalists are (them).
So they marched up to the top of the hill (and the thousands of anticapitatlists), prevented a meeting to discuss stoping Fascism in Europe, had a little strop and marched back down the hill–and away from the real movement.
The Roma gypsies who were going to speak were especially pleased to see a bunch of masked up men in Black (wearing regulation fetish gear of ski masks) wreck their meeting. It made them feel right at home.
So 150 (or 200 if you must) vs 20,000. At least the grand old duke of York had ten thousand men.
But if you wanted to prove that you really are a bunch of sad and bitter Billy No Mates you did a very very good job.
still laughing
Comments
Hide the following 9 comments
Who is having a hissy fit ??
17.10.2004 11:54
Are you talking about the protest or your article???
d mish
comment
17.10.2004 12:01
a spontaneous demo happened AFTER the "storming" - this was about people blocking the road.
the meeting was not prevented - it went ahead after - the only thing that was prevented was the keynote address from KEN LIVINGSTONE
there was a lot of support from many there - and for those involved in the process esp the other europeans - a lot of understanding of the reasons this occured.
this morning at the assembly of the social movements there were two speakers who addressed the intervention from "different sides" - both recieved loud applause.... and that tells you a lot about the forum, the process and the intervention.
inside
trying to understand but failing
17.10.2004 12:07
Babels said, "Many opportunities of experimentation and innovation have been missed out on during the organization of this forum resulting in the exclusion of many. This is in total contradition to the Porto Allegre charter. Instead, the London ESF has employed classical neoliberal organization, management & service delivery, with the result that the form has been totally dependent on the state. This has had disastourous consequence for the development of our movement." They finally mentioned that, "as ESF delegates prepapre to discuss the fight against racism and facism in Europe today, some of our fellow translators cannot be here today beccase they are not allowed into the UK. It is sad that the organisers of the ESF have not helped in this process."
Well... maybe but does that justify disrupting an anti-fascist meeting? If they felt strongly they should have raised it in the meeting by making a contribution. Instead they exposed themselves as anti-democratic thugs. I pity them.
red tom
150 vs 20000, excuse me!
17.10.2004 12:25
I want to hear your views, but please don't go around representing 20000 people.
"So 150 (or 200 if you must) vs 20,000) - very crass!
Also, have you never taken direct action before (picket lines, disruptions, demos etc...), when you were percieved to be in the 'minority' on the occasion?
THe most important thing now is to ask questions why the 150 people (of many nationalities) decided to take that action, and see if they have a point, and if they do, take it into consideration for the future!
dasmian
You sound like the very man C!
17.10.2004 12:43
That is exactly what the ESF organisers and the SWP are doing. The same old stupid right-centrism for ever and ever. Clarity instead of majority! - as Liebknecht said.
You can form a people´s front against fascism. You do - preferably - form a united front against fascism. You can form a united front against war - if neccesary with war opponents of the Labour party. But you don´t form a people´s front against capitalism with members of your bourgeoise.
Maybe those who stormed the meeting were wrong doing so. But putting them into a racist corner - as you do! - and thus smearing them as fascists - THAT IS DISGUSTING! Probably there were Jewish activists in the meeting? Why not accuse those who stormed allypally as antisemites?
What you have done to the ESF and the movement is to instrumentalise it in order to suit the movements policy and direction to match the Party´s line. But the Party´s line is wrong!
Let´s end with Karl Liebknecht: The enemy is standing in your own country!
You are destroying the movement! You will destroy what is left of the SWP!
not in Britain
well done
17.10.2004 14:19
WELL done to all who took part.
I could not afford togo to the ESF not the cost of going in although £20 is a lot to someone with not much money but the cost of sleeping and eating in London,I think London was a mistake,there has been also little organising in the sticks for it,I sadly think all this stuff about SWP and some others(who ARE workers power?)is true.I have noticed these changes in the SWP it has got worse over the last few years and there are always the same few who go round speaking at meeting all over the UK.,People were only told about sleeping in the dome at the last minute and we were told it was for people who had already registered,so as up to then I had not made mind up that decided me not to go,if I was young I would have gone and slept on a floor and taken my chances ,
so I do feel that those protesting were representing all the people who could not go,I would think there were not many disabled people there .I did not feel like the long walk from the station up to ALly Pally usually they have shuttle buses from Wood Green if a show is on but from looking at the official site that did not seem to happen.Why?and also there was no attempt to provide decent food .I have been to AllPal and it is expensive and crap food there,
There are loads ans loads of peopl in small community groups who did not know about this ESF as no attempt has been made to involve them also the cost for a small group to be part of this is too much.
So weell done to those who organised Autonomous spaces and the demo.
Poor
Full of shit anti revolutionary parasitic scum
17.10.2004 14:31
fuck your A-B protest wank
Content: agreed / Appearance: bullshit
17.10.2004 16:37
why not ask the samba-band (that was in the auditorium!) if they'd enter the stage? the way tha action was run just closed every canal people in the auditorium could had open to listen to what was said. there where no fucking flzers to explain the action! just tiny pieces of paper in way to few numbers with way to little letters. how can somebody think of disrupting an event without making flyers? my guess: because it was just about disrupting and feeling radical, not about bringin radical ideas into the esf.
right idea, worst way to do it. ignorant black-block youngsters anarchism.
try it dancing next time!
cotopaxi sound
ESF is traditionally hijacked by center left parties
17.10.2004 21:35
The ESF in Florence was the start of a very well put together PR stunt for the (DS) which saw them snuggling upto the peace and no global movements and culminated (so far) in them ripping off the,by now world famous) rainbow peace flag and using it as their election symbol. The fact that a whole bunch of similar lefty shite in London including Red Ken all want to jump on the band wagon is also very predictable .
Here in Italy it's big bad wolf politix goodies and baddies left and right and for sure the big bad wolf berlusconi
is really rolling back the years with a 1930's revival and sure it's getting scary but on the other hand "the same world is possible" but under a bunch of slimley lefty scum bags who tell you all the lefty fairy tales and then fuck you over for the corporate shilling ... I have given up using the term left and right and now prefer to talk about rich and poor and dry not to call everyone middle class wankers .. but they are good at organising meetings and swaying the vote in their favour ..
Delinquenti di Sinistra