Why not REMOVE BLAIR - Listen Sedgefield
Angry Manc | 06.10.2004 01:24
RE: Mike Brady
- How to Remove Blair
.....
How hard CAN it be? And WHY NOT!? Send a message to the "untouchable" gangster and puppet ... & thus to the puppeteers ...
- How to Remove Blair
.....
How hard CAN it be? And WHY NOT!? Send a message to the "untouchable" gangster and puppet ... & thus to the puppeteers ...
No.1 result for "remove blair" in Google:
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2004/09/297976.html
By Mike Brady, 20.09.2004 (Indymedia UK)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MORE INFO:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tony Blair, New "Labour", 26,110 votes (64.9% of the total 40,258 votes cast) in 2001 (pre 9/11 election).
Figures: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/vote2001/results_constituencies/constituencies/506.stm
Population of Sedgefield: 87,206 people
Census: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/census2001/profiles/20ug.asp
According to the BBC, the turnout was 62%. Thus the number of people eligible to vote was around 64,932.
So 64k (minus the 26k morons who think its good to be the USA's poodle = 38 thousand) people have the opportunity to do us all a favour and tell these puppets that we can still destroy them. Who will Blair be if all of these people turn up to vote him OUT? NOBODY! The people will have sent a clear message to the "establishment" that they are still accountable to US ... Perhaps that's the point - they are not really are they - have they ever been!? :-( ...
What to do!? What of these people;
Douglas Carswell Conservative 8,397 votes
Andrew Duffield Liberal Democrat 3,624 votes
Are there enough people angry enough with Blair in Sedgefield to get all the die-hard Conservative and Lib Dem supporters to protest vote in this unprecidented upcoming election. Surely since the process of law in the country has failed us (UN: "attack on Iraq WAS ILLEGAL" - NO WMD - NO SIGN OF GOLDSMITH'S LEGAL ADVICE - BULLSHIT ENQUIRIES - etc. etc.) and no one seems to have the balls to call for the impeachment and prosecution of Blair, perhaps the people of Sedgefield should exercise their democratic right to remove this poodle of a foreign power. It is the duty of all free-thinking people (who have no doubt already worked out that Bliar NEEDS to be "beheaded", in a political sense) to turn up and help remove this tyrant and warmonger. The media is controlled by a small group of people - most of what you read and watch in the "mainstream" come from people like Murdoch who have their own sinister agendas. "Howard" has apparently met Murdoch recently. Blair was endorsed by the Sun (Murdoch's mouthpiece) before he won. Who knows?... What I do know is that if the same 26k morons vote for Blair (and if all the other sensible people who voted for someone else last time (14k) and only around 12-13k of the lazy people join forces, we can show them that the people are still their masters. This is not asking a lot (Blair only got 40% of the possible vote, leaving 60% WHO DON'T WANT HIM! - people just need to get onboard and we can send a warning to the US empire.
Even before 9/11, after Blair won the election in 2001 the BBC knew that Blair saw himself as the President of the UK (our little Tony Bush ...)
"Cabinet in his own image - Tony Blair has constructed his new cabinet owing nothing to any faction or interest group within Labour"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/vote2001/
Vote "Labour" in the next election - Vote for anyone but "New Labour" (=NEW CONSERVATIVE - or Neo Con ...)
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2004/09/297976.html
By Mike Brady, 20.09.2004 (Indymedia UK)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MORE INFO:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tony Blair, New "Labour", 26,110 votes (64.9% of the total 40,258 votes cast) in 2001 (pre 9/11 election).
Figures: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/vote2001/results_constituencies/constituencies/506.stm
Population of Sedgefield: 87,206 people
Census: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/census2001/profiles/20ug.asp
According to the BBC, the turnout was 62%. Thus the number of people eligible to vote was around 64,932.
So 64k (minus the 26k morons who think its good to be the USA's poodle = 38 thousand) people have the opportunity to do us all a favour and tell these puppets that we can still destroy them. Who will Blair be if all of these people turn up to vote him OUT? NOBODY! The people will have sent a clear message to the "establishment" that they are still accountable to US ... Perhaps that's the point - they are not really are they - have they ever been!? :-( ...
What to do!? What of these people;
Douglas Carswell Conservative 8,397 votes
Andrew Duffield Liberal Democrat 3,624 votes
Are there enough people angry enough with Blair in Sedgefield to get all the die-hard Conservative and Lib Dem supporters to protest vote in this unprecidented upcoming election. Surely since the process of law in the country has failed us (UN: "attack on Iraq WAS ILLEGAL" - NO WMD - NO SIGN OF GOLDSMITH'S LEGAL ADVICE - BULLSHIT ENQUIRIES - etc. etc.) and no one seems to have the balls to call for the impeachment and prosecution of Blair, perhaps the people of Sedgefield should exercise their democratic right to remove this poodle of a foreign power. It is the duty of all free-thinking people (who have no doubt already worked out that Bliar NEEDS to be "beheaded", in a political sense) to turn up and help remove this tyrant and warmonger. The media is controlled by a small group of people - most of what you read and watch in the "mainstream" come from people like Murdoch who have their own sinister agendas. "Howard" has apparently met Murdoch recently. Blair was endorsed by the Sun (Murdoch's mouthpiece) before he won. Who knows?... What I do know is that if the same 26k morons vote for Blair (and if all the other sensible people who voted for someone else last time (14k) and only around 12-13k of the lazy people join forces, we can show them that the people are still their masters. This is not asking a lot (Blair only got 40% of the possible vote, leaving 60% WHO DON'T WANT HIM! - people just need to get onboard and we can send a warning to the US empire.
Even before 9/11, after Blair won the election in 2001 the BBC knew that Blair saw himself as the President of the UK (our little Tony Bush ...)
"Cabinet in his own image - Tony Blair has constructed his new cabinet owing nothing to any faction or interest group within Labour"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/vote2001/
Vote "Labour" in the next election - Vote for anyone but "New Labour" (=NEW CONSERVATIVE - or Neo Con ...)
Angry Manc
e-mail:
angry_manc@hotmail.com