Skip to content or view screen version

Protests force RMC to quit lab project

Toby C | 21.07.2004 13:03 | Animal Liberation

Protests force RMC to quit lab project
By David Firn and Jimmy Burns
Financial Times Published: July 21 2004 5:00 | Last Updated: July 21 2004 5:00

The world's biggest concrete company has pulled out of building a controversial laboratory at Oxford University because of attacks by animal rights activists.

RMC Group said a firebomb attack that caused £150,000 damage last month marked an escalation from "mindless vandalism" to violence that was "putting lives at risk". Incendiary bombs destroyed the control centre, three trucks and other equipment at its site in Chertsey, Surrey..

The concrete work at Oxford, originally due for completion by September, had been speeded up in recent weeks because of attacks claimed by the Animal Liberation Front. But RMC said it was no longer obliged to finish its part of the project because it was sub-contracted to Montpellier, the lead construction contractor that pulled out on Monday in response to intimidation..

"Our role was due to finish by the end of the month, but with Montpellier pulling out yesterday we said our obligations would end," RMC said..

The departures of the two companies has increased pressure on the Home Office to tighten up on extremists. Officials are looking at the possibility of using anti-terrorist legislation to clamp down on activists behind the attacks. Another proposal being examined is laws to stop protests at peoples' homes, a key element in the campaign against scientists and staff of companies linked to animal research.


Source: Financial Times:  http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=Sto\
ryFT&cid=1087373864666

Toby C

Comments

Hide the following 2 comments

keep taking the pills

22.07.2004 10:12

This debate over the status of the protest against the use of animals for vivisection seems to have polarised around the topic of the violence of certain regrettable incidents of intimidation. As a law-abiding animal rights advocate , i am distressed that this is being used to hide the real issues.Let's be frank about this - what has occurred may well be vandalism and willful damge to property , but terrorism it is not. If the terror word is to be invoked , i think it would be far more appropriately used in connection with the appalling crimes being visited on sentient creatures in the name of science.
A guardian leader concluded yesterday with the slogan - the war must be won - i wonder if this implication that the debate over animal rights is equivalent to a war on terrorism is an avoidance of the actual motive which is to champion an inhumane practice. Little surprise therefore that the same writer adds , almost as an aside , that it doesn't matter anyway because they only use rats - did the nazi's not use the same reasoning to justify ethnic cleansing ? What level of debate is this ?

bob


What level of debate is this?

23.12.2004 09:23

So firebombing isn't terrorism nowadays? If you're going to be intellectually lazy enough to make Nazi comparisons, then Krystallnacht is the obvious one--daubing slogans on and vandalising the workplaces and homes of the demonised ones.
If you really care about animals, why not volunteer yourself for experimentation? You could be saving a rat's life!

Mick