Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

BUTLER AND SCARLETT ? !

Tom Free | 19.07.2004 13:25

butler failed to blame anyone for the missing caveats but managed to praise Scarlett and recommend him for promotion?? or should that be !!

Like Blair...I'm confused.

I don't know the difference between a ? and an !.

The confusion will, however, be cleared up next spring when the only proper investigation into the war in Iraq is completed in The States.

All our investigations were corrupted or too limited.

The investigation in The States will nail Blair and Scarlett to the wall.

Unfortunately Scarlett will have been in charge of MI6 for nearly a year by then.

Bin Laden could not have prayed or asked for anything better.

A deleter of caveats in charge of MI6.

This will not work.

Scarlett will have to spend most of his time at MI6 covering up his and Blair's past while at the same time fighting a bitter internal civil war with Inkwell.

At a time of our greatest danger we appoint a liability to take over MI6!!!.

When The Bin orders his sleepers into action on our streets and the morgues are overflowing with the limbless bodies of our citizens... Blair's appointment will then be seen for what it is...Culpable Homicide.

Tom free.

Tom Free

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

smash british imperialism

19.07.2004 15:26

For crying out loud

Who is more stupid, the person who cares who is in charge of british secret services? or the person who thinks british secret services had nthing to do with the war in afghanistan?

you are all idiots

and you can shove your ''war of independence from the USA'' up your ass, we're not occupied, we're an imperialist country and i'm interested in class struggle not bourgeois nationalism

despairing

You are the idiot

19.07.2004 15:36

Thanks. Rather than back me up in my totally justified, if intemperant, rant against the pig-ignorant Right Wing troll, you cook up nobhead charges of "nationalism"

Not wanting to be part of the US neo-con Empire does not mean I want to be part of any other empire.

Its about time you realised what side you're on and stopped slagging off the people who are your natural allies.

Yankee-boy made me angry with his stupid accusations and now you've made me angrier.

You two deserve each other, Mr Despair.

No British nationalist me

psshh

19.07.2004 16:29

maybe the guy is a right wing troll, and maybe i over-reacted, but that doesn't stop your post being just as stupid. To be honest i'm just fed up with this ''war of independence from the USA'' crap i've been hearing lately. Its complete nonsense and it irritates the hell out of me, because we should be picking on our real targets in the UK bourgeoisie, so your post stands for all that moronic anti-american sentiment that distracts us from the real struggle, even if your politics are probably better than that.

despairing

Step Back

19.07.2004 18:07

Here we go again, shouting abuse at the face of government.

Why not forward this item to your local press, or send it to a friend....

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=1927

Does the N.y.p.d. have a web-site?

b.t. fish

UK Indymedia