Skip to content or view screen version

Caroline Lucas signs Simultaneous Policy pledge

Mike Brady | 08.06.2004 21:14

Green MEP, Caroline Lucas, has signed the Simultaneous Policy candidate's pledge. She will now attract the votes of Simultaneous Policy Adopters in the South East region in the forthcoming European Parliament elections. SP is beginning to re-write the rules of elections to put the people in charge.

Pledges of support to new democracy campaign could decide Euro election results

Candidates in the forthcoming European Parliament election could see their chance of success hanging on support for the Simultaneous Policy (SP) campaign. SP Adopters undertake to vote for any candidate, within reason, who signs a pledge of support for the campaign. Green MEP, Caroline Lucas, signed the pledge today. The aim is to build cross-party and international support for the Simultaneous Policy, a package of measures to address global problems such as climate change, unsustainability and unfair trade.

SP Adopters in different regions will be voting for candidates who have signed a pledge to implement the Simultaneous Policy alongside other governments when all, or sufficient, other governments have made the same pledge.

The policy package is being developed by Adopters across the world and will ultimately be put to approval by all citizens. The campaign aims to break the influence of transnational corporations and financial markets on policy setting.

Simpol-UK Local Group Network Coordinator, Mike Brady, said:

"As things stand, SP Adopters in the South East will be voting Green, while in the East they will vote LibDem. The point of difference between candidates is whether they have signed the SP candidate's pledge or not. We aim to ensure only candidates who have signed the pledge are elected. Adopters with a party preference may alternatively encourage their preferred party to support SP."

Adopters in the South-East report that Caroline Lucas was elected to the European Parliament at the last election by a margin of just 249 votes. Support for SP could make all the difference this time around.

When the Simultaneous Policy was first proposed in John Bunzl's book with that title, veteran campaigner and author Noam Chomsky commented: "It's ambitious and provocative. Can it work? Certainly worth a serious try."

Mike Brady said:

"The European elections are just the beginning. By the time of the general election we aim to have far greater support so that signing the SP candidate's pledge will make the difference between winning and losing in marginal constituencies. Our obligation to the international campaign is to achieve a UK government that has pledged to implement SP alongside other nations."

For further information contact Mike Brady on 07986 736179 and see the Local Group Network site  http://spdev.gn.apc.org/ and national site at  http://www.simpol.org.uk/

Notes:

1. The first candidate to sign the SP candidate's pledge was Rosalind Gill, a Cambridge-based LibDem candidate. See the New Statesman 10 May for further information.

2. It is not yet possible to present what the Simultaneous Policy package will contain as the process of development is at an early stage. As greater numbers become involved in the campaign the primary issues to be addressed will emerge through policy fora held around the world under the guidance of National and Global Policy Boards. The Simultaneous Policy package will be put forward for approval by the people of all countries prior to implementation.

3. The UK Simultaneous Policy Organistion (Simpol-UK) was incorporated on 22 March this year and SP Adopters around the country are beginning to form local groups. The Founding Declaration for Simpol-UK (click here) provides additional information. Adopters in other countries are also active and network through the International Simultaneous Policy Organisation (ISPO) - see  http://www.simpol.org/

4. SP's starting point is that we live in pseudo-democracies because governments are limited in the action they can take as they fear disinvestment and loss of jobs if they introduce policies which are distasteful to transnational corporations and financial markets. Human rights and the environment take second place to what is best for 'the economy' and voters become increasingly apathetic, it is argued. SP puts 'we, the people' in charge of deciding the global rules which shape our world and the campaign strategy compels politicians to implement that package of policies when all, or sufficient, other governments have also pledged to do so. Simultaneous implementation removes the threat of disinvestment.

5. Endorsements for the SP strategy can be found on the website  http://www.simpol.org/ In April it was announced that Jose Ramos-Horta:
Foreign Minister, East Timor and winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, 1996, had given his support, stating: "I am pleased to confirm to you my interest in endorsing the SP campaign and to be as active in its support as I can."

6. SP Adopters are delivering leaflets door-to-door with the message: "Had enough of politicians? At the European elections why not vote for yourself? SP - how to use democracy to put the people in charge. Only vote for candidates who pledge to implement the Simultaneous Policy."












Mike Brady
- e-mail: mikebrady@babymilkaction.org
- Homepage: http://www.simpol.org.uk/

Comments

Hide the following 5 comments

What's in the package?

08.06.2004 22:52

There's the rub.

No offense, but it is the inability to come up with an agreed upon package that explains our being split into myriad factions. You need to understand that it isn't even a matter of close enough fit (to what you really want) in terms of on how many issues there is agreement. For many of us there are "litmus test" issues, issues we value more than other issues and if the package fails to contain one upon which we insist -- or contains one intolerable to us, we won't support the package.

HOWEVER -- this is a good idea, a chance to discover if maybe there might not be a few things that COULD be in a "universal package" >

Mike
mail e-mail: stepbystepfarm mtdata.com


Bad Timing

09.06.2004 00:13

I'm sorry but I am completely confused by this. How can Caroline Lucas justify adding support for this "Simultaneous Policy" right on the eve of the European Union elections? I have looked at the website and still have absolutely no idea what this means in terms of what piolicies Mrs/Ms/Miss C Lucas is supporting. There is no time to check before the elections what she is actually supporting!! I don't understand what this is all about.

Brian B


SP is a process as well as a package

09.06.2004 06:43

Don't get so hung up on wanting to know what the Simultaneous Policy package contains. It is a work in progress being developed by SP Adopters around the world. You can see from the ''Founding Declaration" what values the campaigning organisation Simpol-UK has. Policy development is underway as we speak - here in Cambridge we have been holding public meetings on topics such as 'Making all trade Fair Trade', 'Achieving sustainable energy use' and 'Food security for all.' These are goals that are difficult or impossible to achieve through conventional politics and campaigning. While we do all we can to change existing policies, SP gives us the opportunity to do what is necessary not just what will be tolerated.

But SP is a process as well as a policy package. That is why politicians such as Caroline Lucas and Rosalind Gill are giving it support. How are global policies set at the moment? Behind closed doors, where arm-twisting and bribary hold more sway than argument. Where the interests of transnationals and financial markets come before human rights and the environment. SP puts people at the centre of policy making - the policy package is being developed by SP Adopters and anyone can become an SP Adopter for no charge, just go to the site  http://www.simpol.org.uk/ Candidates who are signing the pledge are agreeing in principle to implement the policy package to address global problems being developed by we, the people of the world. The aim is to achieve, candidate by candidate, elected politician by elected politician, governments that have made the same pledge so that simultaneous implementation of the policy package can be triggered. This is a long-term strategy running in parallel to conventional campaigning. We have time to build the number of SP Adopters and to develop and agree the policy package.

To actually set the policies now would be undemocratic and would make the SP campaign a top-down political organisation, which it is not. It facilitates policy formation by people around the world and there needs to be far greater involvement before we can come close to setting policies in concrete and putting them out for final approval by all people.

So if you have views about the policies you want to see in SP, please get involved. SP isn't setting out to reinvent the wheel. There is a great deal of analysis of global problems and suggested solutions out there. SP sets out to harness that and to try to form a coherent whole, a vision for how we want the world to be which the majority can support.

If you want to see a different process of politics, where our views come before pressure from vested financial interests, then you can do that right now by supporting the SP campaign and voting for those candidates who have signed the SP pledge, or by encouraging your preferred party to sign the pledge.

As Chomsky said, it is ambitious. But if candidates are now taking it seriously and signing the pledge then we are off the starting blocks.

Mike Brady
mail e-mail: mikebrady@babymilkaction.org
- Homepage: http://www.simpol.org.uk/


Hidden

09.06.2004 11:07

This newswire is not meant for news, not party political adverts. Please read our editorial guidelines:
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/static/editorial.html

cheers

an IMC volunteer


SP is not party political

09.06.2004 17:16

I don't quite understand this comment which suggests SP is party political. The whole point of SP is that it is not party political. SP Adopters undertake to vote for any candidate at elections, within reason, who pledges to implement SP alongside other governments. If the campaign isn't permitted to tell you who has signed the pledge then that's a problem.

Many campaigns ask supporters to lobby politicians to pledge to a particular policy. The anti-Iraq war campaign comes to mind. The campaign on tuition fees is another.

Mike Brady
mail e-mail: mikebrady@babymilkaction.org
- Homepage: http://www.simpol.org.uk/