Skip to content or view screen version

Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Open Letter to Respect Comrades

Socialist Sums | 06.06.2004 11:33 | London

Following up the previous open letter

This weekend we have had an absolute mauling in the left/centre press. Firstly, the New Statesman, then the Guardian and today the Observer. Are they scared of us and playing us down, or are they reacting to us talking ourselves up?

Every time I turn to the mainstream media, I read or hear that we are going to do nothing. Every time I talk to anyone backing Respect I hear that we are going to do really well. Who do I believe? Much as I detest the mainstream media, those of us campaigning on the left do tend to be over enthusiastic about our chances in every election we stand in. I’ve been around long enough to spot a false dawn when I see it.

We are going to do a lot better than the SLP did in 1999 and that is an absolute certainty. What is also clear four days before the election is that we are going to fall short of winning the Euro seat in London. Much as I feel for George (and he looks shattered with all the work he has put in) it just isn’t going to happen this time.

I think we can still get 5% so the Assembly vote is obvious, as is my vote for the Mayor. But I’m not going to vote Respect in the Euros, because I don’t think it is going to help elect an anti-war MEP. Sorry George. Sorry Comrades.

I got involved with Stop the War because I believed it would make a difference. Respect was the obvious evolution. Like many others I believed we would do it when I saw us united together at the start of this campaign. I really want Blair to fall over Iraq and I want these election results to hurt New Labour.

Our votes on Thursday need to elect an anti-war MEP in London. If like me, you don’t think George can do it, you know that there is only one other choice. Whatever you think of the membership, the tactics and the selfishness of her party, Jean Lambert has not been a bad MEP (this goes without saying for Caroline Lucas in the South East). She had the right policy on Afghanistan and Iraq, and for these reasons, she will be getting my Euro vote through gritted teeth.

In return, I want more respect for us from the Greens after these elections. They must stand aside for us in areas where we are majority voice of the anti-war movement, because if Jean Lambert is elected, they need to recognise that tactical socialist votes delivered this. We can't allow a result where both Respect and the Greens lose out on a Euro seat. No anti-war MEP for London? Not acceptable. We'll take the disappointment of not getting George elected but let us build on our gains and begin work on a socialist challenge to pro-war Labour MPs with Lindsey as our democratically elected leader.

Socialist Sums

Comments

Hide the following 2 comments

Respectful advice...

06.06.2004 12:55

You seem to be throwing a lot of responsibility for the lack of unity of left leaning, environmentally thinking folk at the Green Party. What you and the rest of Respect need to realise is that the involvement of the SWP in Respect is an electoral liability. It is no good denying it, either. My membership of Respect has been marred by the unrelenting omnipresence of SWP papersellers and placards at every Respect event. It is now irrelevent because I am going to vote for who I believe best represents my feelings, not just nationally, in Europe, but globally. The environment is the most important issue. Put that first and everything else will eventually fall into place. The argument for tactical voting is garbage. The net result is always (ALWAYS!) that one of the two main parties retains the balance of power. And suggestions that a vote fo a so-called minority interest party is a wasted vote is an insult to both the voter and the last remaining shreds of what is supposed to be democracy.

You ask for respect from the Greens. What about respect for them? Why should they turn their backs on their supporters of 31 years to fall behind an upstart SWP glove puppet!

If you only have one party in a coalition - then how is it a coalition?

I truly hope their will be some co-operation between the two but I hope it will begin with some practical steps to curb the SWP influence/infiltration of the SWP. If you are about to counter this by saying that it doesn't exist then you must deal with the widely held perception that it does!

Zinfandel


Respect Policies

06.06.2004 13:12

A further point regarding the Green/Respect issue. As I pointed out, the Greens have been campaigning for 31 years and have well established policies. Respect, on the other hand, have failed to answer countless questions via e-mail and at meetings about their policies on a whole raft of issues. Their campaigners frequently do not know what they are campaigning for and the recent debacle about gender segregation and gay rights issues just shows that they will say anything for expediency without thinking it through. This is what comes of not having a structured policy process, or indeed a recognisable process of determining leadership. As pointed out on other posts, I attended many early meetings and the leadership issue was never raised. It seems to have been assumed.

Zinfandel