Skip to content or view screen version

Iraqis boyoneted

Zinfandel | 03.06.2004 16:34

From Private Eye No.1107

"Bayonet Brits kill 35 rebels" drooled the Sun

FLEET STREET'S armchair warriors thrilled to the news last week that soldiers of the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders had defeated a large force of Shia militiamen in Iraq in an action involving bayonet charges - the first by British troops since the Falklands war. No one loves the flash of cold steel more than a tabloid sub-editor, and the hacks had a field day. "Bayonet Brits kill 35 rebels" drooled the Sun. "Our boys' victory in brave charge", said the Daily Star. The Daily Mail reminded readers that the Argylls formed the Thin Red Line at Balaclava, while the Grauniad's Stephen Moss mused upon the "psychosexual effect on the user" of fixing a bayonet to one's weapon. Among all the lovingly-reported detail of Iraqi bodies strewn across the highway and floating in the river, no one stopped to ask why the Argylls had used bayonets. The Eye has learned that the soldiers involved are furious at the gung-ho press coverage because it ignored the actual reason - that the ill-supplied Argylls were so short of ammunition that they had no choice but to resort to the bayonet or be killed.

Doesn't this rather suggest that the people that were killed might have been unarmed?

Zinfandel

Comments

Hide the following comment

Bayonet Charges

03.06.2004 17:41

The reason bayonet charges arent used much these days is that charging at someone with an automatic weapon tends to result in your messy death. Only the worst shot can miss a directly approaching target.

DavidC
mail e-mail: davidclements_03@hotmail.com
- Homepage: http://www.davidc.cjb.net