If you had any real problems, Tarquin & Tara, you wouldn't have the time for this sentimentalist nonsense. Here's to you & your charmed life...

Friends,

Please don't talk about 'puppies' on animal rights literature, banners, etc. It makes us look sentimental. It suggests that the dogs being puppies makes it worse than if they were adult dogs. This is the exact discrimination that we should be campaigning against. If you have not read Peter Singers Animal Liberation then please do.

This scum company, Sequani ltd, practise Reproductive Toxicology on Beagle dogs. 'R.T' techniques include force feeding pregnant dogs via tube, pill or injection with carcinogenic substances to ascertain how the unborn react to the filth that flows through their mothers bloodstream.

The mother dogs can be induced to bring on labour or left to give 'birth' at the end of their term, either way clever asses, the offspring are killed and mutilated to ascertain the final results of these filthy carcinogenicity experiments.

Sequani Limited do this to dogs. Baby dogs are called 'puppies'. Red Ted can f*ck off too while we're at it. You prat! Go and try and be 'revolutionary' outside your front door sucker.

Peter Singer? No Masters, No Disciples Robbie. Our hearts lead the battle. He may have spelt it out in his books but PUPPY KILLERS are PUPPY KILLERS and this is what this company are. Do summat useful, contact DHL now!


For the animals always,

LIBER^8^OR

..they're all animal killers aren't they at the end of the day. Contact this company DHL that provides their business to these pervert animal molestors Sequani if you give a damn about vivisection. That was all that was asked in the above post?

We've all got problems Red Ted, even the dogs! They can't speak of them, we can speak for them. Where's your compassion for sentient beings that feel and react like you do to fear and pain?

I think that most animal rights/ liberation activists would agree that an adult dog is as important as a puppy; they use the word puppy not because they are overly sentimental themselves but to appeal to the general public. The majority of the public has not read "animal liberation", and it's difficult to get a convincing, reasoned argument on a banner, so an appeal to emotions is often used instead! Another point is that mice and rats are most often used in experiments, not dogs or cats; but the majority of the public couldn't give a damn about what happens to mice or rats but can relate to cats and dogs. Hence no "Rat killers!" banners, though torturing rats or mice is as immoral as torturing puppies.
Mind you, "animal torturers" is also an emotive term isn't it? And it covers more than just fluffy puppies. I think i'd prefer this term, I too am uncomfortable with "puppy killers" (I think it makes us sound liike morons!).

Thanks Robbie and ARP for debating this. I think AR units (us included) have well over used the term 'puppy killer/s' in the past. 'Animal torturers' broadens the spectrum.


Thanks for reminding us who have been stuck in our ways!

PACA - West Midlands