Iraq’s persistent insurgency
Kenneth Katzman | 29.04.2004 12:13
Kenneth Katzman explores the nature of the violent insurgency in Iraq and the debate over foreign fighters in the conflict.
The resistance to the US occupation of Iraq has defied most predictions in its duration, its intensity, its composition and its operations. General John Abizaid, commander of the US Central Command, has characterised the resistance as fighting a "classic guerrilla war" against the US-led coalition, led by "mid-level Ba’ath Party activists organised regionally together with foreign fighters".
The guerrilla campaign has persisted despite Saddam Hussein’s capture on 13 December 2003. The resistance has continued to demonstrate its ability to attack buildings and cause mass casualties, attack US forces and installations with conventional weapons, sack some local Iraqi governing installations, deter foreign investment and slow the pace of reconstruction.
One of the keys to understanding the resistance is analysing its motivations. From its inception, the resistance has represented an amalgam of motivations and goals. Some elements of the resistance want to restore the old Ba’athist regime, while others have been motivated by the goal of forming a Hardline Islamic state.
To accomplish those goals, all elements of the resistance hope to demonstrate that US stabilisation efforts are not working by causing international relief workers and peacekeeping forces to leave Iraq, slowing reconstruction, turning the Iraqi populace against the occupation and provoking civil conflict among Iraq’s various sects and ethnicities.
These efforts have led the resistance to aim at a wide range of targets: US forces; Iraqis and foreigners working for the Coalition Provisional Authority; infrastructure facilities; and symbols of the international presence, including the headquarters of the UN in Baghdad.
To date, resistance attacks have had only a minimal material effect on governance and the pace of economic reconstruction. However, the resistance has succeeded in creating a perception of chaos and a perception that US policy is in difficulty. The resistance has also caused the Bush administration to seek to minimise fallout in a US election year by accelerating the handover of sovereignty and security functions to Iraqis.
The guerrilla campaign has persisted despite Saddam Hussein’s capture on 13 December 2003. The resistance has continued to demonstrate its ability to attack buildings and cause mass casualties, attack US forces and installations with conventional weapons, sack some local Iraqi governing installations, deter foreign investment and slow the pace of reconstruction.
One of the keys to understanding the resistance is analysing its motivations. From its inception, the resistance has represented an amalgam of motivations and goals. Some elements of the resistance want to restore the old Ba’athist regime, while others have been motivated by the goal of forming a Hardline Islamic state.
To accomplish those goals, all elements of the resistance hope to demonstrate that US stabilisation efforts are not working by causing international relief workers and peacekeeping forces to leave Iraq, slowing reconstruction, turning the Iraqi populace against the occupation and provoking civil conflict among Iraq’s various sects and ethnicities.
These efforts have led the resistance to aim at a wide range of targets: US forces; Iraqis and foreigners working for the Coalition Provisional Authority; infrastructure facilities; and symbols of the international presence, including the headquarters of the UN in Baghdad.
To date, resistance attacks have had only a minimal material effect on governance and the pace of economic reconstruction. However, the resistance has succeeded in creating a perception of chaos and a perception that US policy is in difficulty. The resistance has also caused the Bush administration to seek to minimise fallout in a US election year by accelerating the handover of sovereignty and security functions to Iraqis.
Kenneth Katzman
Comments
Hide the following 8 comments
Kenneth Katzman should get another job
29.04.2004 12:30
IMC does not need this. Jesus - even The Times doesn't need this; they've got enough people writing this sort of bilge as it is.
Stop wasting everyone's time. This convinces nobody but the converted. And they will believe anything as long as someone "official" says it.
Yawn
Propaganda
29.04.2004 12:35
Reports form Iraq suggest there are two groups at work - 'the resistance' fighting the occupiers and their proxies and 'terrorists' who are targetting Iraqi civilians, the UN, Red Cross etc - see Robert Fisk's reports.
Clearly the resistance are fighting for self-determination as much as anything else - yeah al-sadr's a religious nut, there may be some ba'athists etc but fundamentally the resistance is a national liberation front like the viet cong. I abhor nationalism but support all peoples' right to self-determination and self government - so I have to support the principle of resistance to occupation (but not the targeting of civilians obviously, although being a 'civilian' mercenary makes you a target methinks)
Tom
For those who don't know
29.04.2004 13:08
I know that Ken recently returned from Iraq and Kuwait and his piece for the New York Times was highly critical of US foreign policy. I realise that many people who contribute to IndyMedia are strongly anti-American in their views and as such if a piece is contributed that does not confirm to their view that all Iraq is against the US and UK troops then they tend to attack it and the author.
Ken spent two months in Iraq researching this article (which forms part of a much longer piece due for publication in the near future). He traveled independently and did not liases with US or UK forces, the report posted formed reflects the reality he saw and the conversations he had.
Growbag
June 30th Handover?!
29.04.2004 13:11
The secret of good puppetry, as any Thunderbirds fan will know, is to conceal the strings. From my extensive research I can reveal that the US government appear to be using a magic thread which is only invisible if you consume drinks which bear the legend 'Diet' or 'Lite'.
To enhance your enjoyment of this performance, the producers have provided refreshments in the foyer...
Please take your seats...
'You will lose your liberties' - John Ashcroft
Zinfandel
Rubbish article
29.04.2004 14:51
REALLY? Is that why the Guardian earlier this week reported that reconstruction efforts were about to grind to a halt?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,1204178,00.html
Krop
Homepage: http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,1204178,00.html
Standard "anti-American" slur
29.04.2004 15:29
If the occupiers care about democracy, why was one of their first acts to disband the local councils set up by Iraqi communnities post-saddam and replace them with US appointed ones?(1)
I am open to having my opinions challenged . . . I would love to believe that Iraq is now a smiley happy utopia bar a few neo-luddite foreign ex-ba'athist fighters bent on backwardness. I suggest Jo Wilding (2) and Dahr Jamail (3) for reports from Iraq (they actually leave their hotels). The ongoing coalition war crimes in Fallujah illustrate my cynicism of the official 'liberation' version of events. Please challenge my views, but do so with sourced, referenced material i.e. proper reporting not 'analysis' that parrots overdone propaganda, otherwise there's little I can engage with. cheers
Notes
(1) http://www.nologo.org/newsite/detaild.php?ID=367
(2) http://www.wildfirejo.org.uk/
(3) http://blog.newstandardnews.net/iraqdispatches/
Tom (or am I Kenneth Katzman?)
Some of Ken's work
29.04.2004 17:00
www.theage.com.au/
http://www.ceip.org/files/publications/ARB-07-03.asp#iraq
http://www.novapublishers.com/return_search.asp?fieldAuthors=Kenneth%20Katzman
Growbag
yes Kenneth Katzman exists . . .
29.04.2004 17:25
Tom