Pat Tillman: Hero or Wasted Life?
Gary Sudborough | 26.04.2004 01:17 | Anti-militarism | World
An argument against the US corporate media's depiction of American soldiers as "heroes" when they are engaged in an immoral and illegal war for fallacious reasons, especially when the war leaves a radioactive legacy of cancers and deformed children like the present wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
There is no doubt about the bravery of Pat Tillman or his idealism in resigning from a lucrative career in the National Football League after 9-11 to, as he perceived the situation, protect America and fight the terrorists responsible for this spectacular, deadly attack on American soil. However, soldiers all through history have exhibited great courage in combat, although often fighting for mistaken, spurious reasons or even against their own best interests. I know there were many German soldiers in World War 2 who were fervent believers in fascism and willingly sacrificed themselves for an ideology which cost tens of millions of lives, lead to the death camps and devastated the continent of Europe. The same could be said of Japan's kamikaze pilots. Their sacrifice was exceedingly brave, but was their emperor really that close to God. The German and Japanese media certainly attempted to make heroes of these men. There were many true believers among the Protestants and Catholics who fought one another in the bloody Thirty Years War and exterminated about sixty percent of the population of northern Europe. Naturally, the kings and nobles had their own economic and political interests in these religious wars. Are all these people heroes simply because they were courageous in battle or possessed an ardent belief in their mission or ideology?
Pat Tillman obviously didn't realize that the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were planned long before 9-11 occurred and both were intimately connected to US control of oil reserves, rather than to any so-called war on terrorism. He was probably oblivious to the fact that terrorism has been used before in history as an excuse for wars of aggression, perpetrated for other reasons. Hitler used the excuses of communist terrorism and terrorism against Germans for his annexations of Austria and Czechoslovakia. Ronald Reagan had his own war against terrorism in Central America in order to defeat socialist revolutions there, which were a threat to the capitalist system. Our own American revolutionaries were considered to be terrorists by the British. Using fear as a means of manipulation and control is nothing new.
Therefore, Pat Tillman was not defending the American people, as he imagined, but by participating in a war against the innocent people of Afghanistan and Iraq was actually increasing the anger and resentment towards the United States and raising the probability of another terrorist attack on the US mainland, rather than diminishing such a probability. He may just as well have worn the company logos of Chevron-Texaco and Exxon-Mobil on his uniform as the US flag because this is who he really was fighting for, as well as the weapons manufacturers and companies like Halliburton and Bechtel. 9-11 was the fear-inspiring event that George W. Bush cynically utilized to pursue his real agenda of corporate domination and profiteering.
In my opinion, the real heroes are people like Ron Kovic, Stan Goff and other veterans who have taken the time and effort to discover the truth about recent wars and the nature of imperialism. They are willing to oppose US interventions in other countries and suffer the ridicule and disapprobation of American society for challenging some of its most cherished myths-myths like the continuous glorification of war and the supposition that American troops always fight for noble goals like freedom and democracy. They also attempt to educate military personnel and that is essential in stopping this scourge of war. People are heroes for fighting against the real ills afflicting humanity like slavery, racism, oppression and injustice, not for fighting for myths created by a ruling class intent on wars for their own benefit. That is simply a wasted life.
The glaring hypocrisy of the US corporate media in its hero worship is easily illustrated by the Spanish Civil War. American soldiers, such as those in the Abraham Lincoln Brigade, fought fascism in Spain and the troops and modern weapons of Hitler and Mussolini years before World War 2 started. They exhibited extraordinary courage in fighting tanks and airplanes with small arms and outdated artillery. Were these brave American soldiers of the "greatest American generation" called heroes in the US corporate media? No, they were either ignored or labeled "premature antifascists." Some were even hounded by the FBI for years after World War 2 and lost job after job for being leftists. Every American knows about the heroes of the Normandy landing on D-day, but ask an average American if they have ever heard of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade. Obviously, the criteria for who is deemed worthy of being depicted as a hero by the US corporate media is determined purely on economic and political motivations and not on actual courage or sacrifice, as the corporate media so pompously pretend.
I knew the instant I learned that Pat Tillman was killed in Afghanistan that the corporate media were going to make a propaganda extravaganza out of his death, lasting days, if not weeks. After all, MSNBC calls every American soldier killed in Iraq a "hero" and has a whole wall dedicated to them with photos of the deceased soldiers. From time to time the hosts relate little stories about these soldiers lives to their audience. No mention is given to poisonous effects of the US military's use of depleted uranium on the health of other potential "heroes." Little emphasis is placed on Iraqi casualties or the great suffering and misery of the Iraqi people. Neither the Pentagon nor the corporate media keep an accounting of the Iraqi dead and wounded. Of course, the insinuation here is that only American lives matter and the Iraqis are subhuman, much as Goebbels depicted the Jews and Slavs.
It has been my perception from watching war after war involving the United States that the corporate media always attempt to glorify each and every war and build public support for it, no matter how ridiculous the justifications for the war or how illegal, immoral and destructive the war happens to be. That glorification is probably the greatest evil perpetrated by the US corporate media and very dangerous to humanity's survival in an age of nuclear weapons. However, it is understandable, when one considers many of these media corporations are owned by weapons manufacturers.
Pat Tillman obviously didn't realize that the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were planned long before 9-11 occurred and both were intimately connected to US control of oil reserves, rather than to any so-called war on terrorism. He was probably oblivious to the fact that terrorism has been used before in history as an excuse for wars of aggression, perpetrated for other reasons. Hitler used the excuses of communist terrorism and terrorism against Germans for his annexations of Austria and Czechoslovakia. Ronald Reagan had his own war against terrorism in Central America in order to defeat socialist revolutions there, which were a threat to the capitalist system. Our own American revolutionaries were considered to be terrorists by the British. Using fear as a means of manipulation and control is nothing new.
Therefore, Pat Tillman was not defending the American people, as he imagined, but by participating in a war against the innocent people of Afghanistan and Iraq was actually increasing the anger and resentment towards the United States and raising the probability of another terrorist attack on the US mainland, rather than diminishing such a probability. He may just as well have worn the company logos of Chevron-Texaco and Exxon-Mobil on his uniform as the US flag because this is who he really was fighting for, as well as the weapons manufacturers and companies like Halliburton and Bechtel. 9-11 was the fear-inspiring event that George W. Bush cynically utilized to pursue his real agenda of corporate domination and profiteering.
In my opinion, the real heroes are people like Ron Kovic, Stan Goff and other veterans who have taken the time and effort to discover the truth about recent wars and the nature of imperialism. They are willing to oppose US interventions in other countries and suffer the ridicule and disapprobation of American society for challenging some of its most cherished myths-myths like the continuous glorification of war and the supposition that American troops always fight for noble goals like freedom and democracy. They also attempt to educate military personnel and that is essential in stopping this scourge of war. People are heroes for fighting against the real ills afflicting humanity like slavery, racism, oppression and injustice, not for fighting for myths created by a ruling class intent on wars for their own benefit. That is simply a wasted life.
The glaring hypocrisy of the US corporate media in its hero worship is easily illustrated by the Spanish Civil War. American soldiers, such as those in the Abraham Lincoln Brigade, fought fascism in Spain and the troops and modern weapons of Hitler and Mussolini years before World War 2 started. They exhibited extraordinary courage in fighting tanks and airplanes with small arms and outdated artillery. Were these brave American soldiers of the "greatest American generation" called heroes in the US corporate media? No, they were either ignored or labeled "premature antifascists." Some were even hounded by the FBI for years after World War 2 and lost job after job for being leftists. Every American knows about the heroes of the Normandy landing on D-day, but ask an average American if they have ever heard of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade. Obviously, the criteria for who is deemed worthy of being depicted as a hero by the US corporate media is determined purely on economic and political motivations and not on actual courage or sacrifice, as the corporate media so pompously pretend.
I knew the instant I learned that Pat Tillman was killed in Afghanistan that the corporate media were going to make a propaganda extravaganza out of his death, lasting days, if not weeks. After all, MSNBC calls every American soldier killed in Iraq a "hero" and has a whole wall dedicated to them with photos of the deceased soldiers. From time to time the hosts relate little stories about these soldiers lives to their audience. No mention is given to poisonous effects of the US military's use of depleted uranium on the health of other potential "heroes." Little emphasis is placed on Iraqi casualties or the great suffering and misery of the Iraqi people. Neither the Pentagon nor the corporate media keep an accounting of the Iraqi dead and wounded. Of course, the insinuation here is that only American lives matter and the Iraqis are subhuman, much as Goebbels depicted the Jews and Slavs.
It has been my perception from watching war after war involving the United States that the corporate media always attempt to glorify each and every war and build public support for it, no matter how ridiculous the justifications for the war or how illegal, immoral and destructive the war happens to be. That glorification is probably the greatest evil perpetrated by the US corporate media and very dangerous to humanity's survival in an age of nuclear weapons. However, it is understandable, when one considers many of these media corporations are owned by weapons manufacturers.
Gary Sudborough
e-mail:
IconoclastGS@aol.com
Homepage:
http://www.theblackflag.org/iconoclast
Comments
Hide the following 15 comments
What a pity
26.04.2004 07:36
When you the guts to do what they have done are are doing your views will be valid.
Simon
A wasted life indeed..
26.04.2004 11:39
You know, its a bit reminiscent of when those four mercenaries were grilled in fallujah. All the sorrow and grief in the world was gushed forth by the media, whilst convieniently ignoring the fact that those scumbags CHOSE to go to another country as an occupier.
One less overfed moronic meathead in the world is fine by me though.
Abdul Kareem
More's the pity
26.04.2004 11:44
bendeus
You assume . . .
26.04.2004 12:48
You assume I support the actions of the UK and US in Falluja and other parts of Iraq, I do not.
I do however recognise the bravery of a man (or woman) who volunters to fight for and defend his country. It is a unique descion to take, and one that not many on IM have taken. When they have made that descion they will be in a position to decide on its merits.
Simon
not protecting his country
26.04.2004 14:37
People who sign up to the army to 'protect' their country but in fact know that they are the aggressor are not heros or brave.
fredrico
e-mail: musteatvegan@yahoo.co.uk
Fool`
26.04.2004 15:55
X
Reply to Simon
26.04.2004 16:15
Gary Sudborough
e-mail: IconoclastGS@aol.com
Homepage: http://www.theblackflag.org/iconoclast
You Are Just Wrong. Period.
27.04.2004 20:31
They are generally a reaction to America being attacked on 9/11.
The U.S. needs energy; there is nothing wrong with pursuing the largest and most stable sources available. What would the alternative be?
Not So Silent Majority
Pay for your oil aresehole
28.04.2004 00:46
The alternative you moron is to pay for your oil ...and stop being greedy obesce Nazis wankers.
ernesto
So now what?
29.04.2004 20:27
-dD
dD
Pat Tillman
29.04.2004 21:35
You bemoan the defeat of socialist revolutions in Central America. How can someone ignore the history of Marxism--the pogroms in the Soviet Union, the horrors of mass starvation and concentration camps in North Korea, the complete intolerance for "non-conformist" thought that results in long prison sentences or worse (Cuba, Vietnam, Cuba, Soviet Union, North Korea, the list goes on...), the widespread shortage of food and other essentials--to believe that Marxism is superior to capitalism?? For the same reason, please explain your apparent infatuation with Islamism. Name one Islamist country that allows for true freedom of expression.
I truly appreciate the sacrifice Pat Tillman made for freedom--freedom not just for Americans, but freedom for all people in the world. As a former American soldier, I also realize that Pat Tillman was not "duped" by anyone. Unlike you, he understood the difference between freedom and oppression, good versus evil. He gave his life for those who appreciate freedom, and unfortunately for ungrateful idiots like you who enjoy the benefits of a free society such as the UK or US, yet hypocritically denounce the capitalist system as "unfair" or "oppressive." Your intellectual laziness, ignorance, hatred, and ingratitude disgust me.
John
John B.
Pitiful dupe
30.04.2004 08:33
Rumsfeld, fighting for FREEDOM
How is fighting in Iraq advancing the cause of FREEDOM? Name one single US military action since WWII which has improved the lives of the people in the country the US has invaded, bombed, infiltrated with CIA ops, etc. How can someone ignore the history of capitalism: tens of millions dead, many more tortured and "disappeared", in Vietnam, Cambodia, Chile, Honduras, Nicaragua, Guatemala, Indonesia, etc. by your FREEDOM-loving pals like Pinochet, Suharto, Rios-Montt, Stroessner, etc.
The truth is that the US doesn't give a flying fuck about FREEDOM, which is why it supported Saddam for so long, and continues to support dictators around the world as bad or worse than Saddam, in Uzbekistan, Saudi, etc. You've just upped your cash contribution in a big way to "President" Islam Karimov of Uzbekistan, who likes to boil his critics alive, and arrest the victims' families if they protest. You've got to keep the boy sweet though, 'cause your precious fucking oil and gas have to cross his country to get to your tankers. And for the same reasons, the US continues to enthusiastically support dictatorships in Pakistan and Saudi, where the accused 9/11 hijackers came from.
And if Saddam had stayed obedient, he would still be your "ally in the war on terror" today, same as Gadaffi's Libya, Musharraff's Pakistan, Saudi, and the rest.
Unlike you, I understand the difference between freedom and oppression, good versus evil. Your intellectual laziness, blinkered ignorance and hatred disgust me. You're so typical of your kind, and Bush got where he was on the back of useful idiots like you.
Ian
pick and choose
02.05.2004 15:33
dD
Clarifying your history
03.05.2004 12:38
"so you shake hands with the devil and that situation made the US so unpopular(Aliance with Saddam's Iraq in the 80's, Israel)."
The US alliances with Iraq and Israel were not stemming from the Cold War, though Cold War politics touched on those relationships as it touched on everything else. By the 80s it was clear as crystal that the Stalinist USSR was finished as a threat. The US and UK backed Saddam as a bulwark against Shia nationalism and Islamism. Saddam's Baath party was brought to power by the CIA to get rid of the former Iraq nationalist Kassem government. Saddam was a Stalinist himself, and had USSR backing for decades. Yet we bought him out as an ally, because he was willing to do business on our terms, use the dollar as the oil currency, etc. And if the relationship with Israel was simply about defeating the USSR, the USA wouldn't still be sucking Sharon's cock today.
Naming Bosnia, and even worse naming Afghanistan, as examples of lives improved by US military action is such a sick joke that I almost hesitate to dignify it with a response. The US deliberately started the breakup of Yugoslavia by insisting on rapid recognition of the breakaway states, and gave Milosevic the excuse he needed to go in with the tanks. Check the casualty numbers,and you'll find that they went shooting up when the US started bombing. Bosnia today is now a NATO protectorate, and would collapse straight back into bloody civil war if the troops were removed. Churches are still being burned down, and Serbs are still being forced to flee. Do you really think this an improvement over life in the former Yugoslavia, before the US pushed so hard for its breakup?
Life in Afghanistan has gone right back to its usual daily horror. All that's changed is the Taliban are gone, and life is as it was before them. In their place is your "ally in the war on terror", that sick bastard General Dostum, and his moral equivalents who run the rest of the country outside of Kabul. Women are still forced to wear the Burqa, and life is still a grinding hell. But your oil will get through, so the nominal GDP will rise, and you evil bastards can claim that it's all been a huge success.
"And most of the other "situations" you name or "unofficial wars of the CIA" seems to had revolution brewing amongst the people anyway."
Yes, they wanted to try to build a life for themselves, without taking your wishes into account. How very unfortunate for them. So you had to go in and kill them in their millions, by bombing them, invading them, and installing proxy governments to do the work for you when you pulled your troops out.
"For countries like Saudi Arabia they are semi-free by there own choosing."
I would like to hear precisely what the Saudi people are free to do. Semi-free? By their own choosing? What the fuck are you talking about?
"This wasn't about oil. If it was gas would not have gone up $1.00 US in the past years."
What are you saying here? If the war was about oil, then the price would be going down, so since the price has gone up it must not have been about oil? Is that your logic?
"Even in a Communist state which (great example china) the army is taking over providences that "used to belong to old china" through any means possible (poor Tibet)."
Yes, poor Tibet. So why does your freedom-loving country keep importing more and more from China, and keep granting them Most Favored Nation trading status? The answer is simple: the US doesn't gave a fuck about human rights or freedom. You only care only about propping up your business partners, and getting cheap gas for your SUVs.
"The Us still buys it's oil from Opec nations. So if we went to war over oil we would be in Saudia Arabia Right?"
You don't need to go to war in Saudi, or Kuwait, etc. over oil. You have tame dictatorships there doing the job for you. But as soon as they lose power, or get disobedient like Saddam did, you will go in guns blazing, blathering on about "freedom".
"They may have been from Saudi however trained in Afganistan."
Still believing that lie, are you? Have you checked on the evidence for this yet? Do you still believe that we went to war in Iraq over WMDs too?
"Besides when we leave Iraqis and the world will have to worry about one less Dictator right?"
Wrong. The world will have one less formerly-US-backed dictator. The new US-backed dictators will keep right on coming.
Iraq will have a new dictator too: you've already started putting Baathists back in charge, like the General you've just installed to run Falluja. And so long as they stay obedient, and keep doing business on your terms, you'll turn a blind eye to all the brutal shit they get up to, same as you did so long for Saddam.
Ian
The REAL wasted life
28.01.2006 21:20
Brittany Heckman
e-mail: b15tiny@aol.com