Skip to content or view screen version

Community activism - revolutionary or reformist?

BAN | 30.03.2004 22:59 | Social Struggles

The recently formed Bristol Anarchist Network is pleased to announce it's first public event - an open disussion meeting on the pros & cons of community activism & involvement. There is no party line, and no pre-determined correct answers to the questions raised in the text of the flyer below. Come along.....

‘Revolutionaries and Community Organisations’

A discussion meeting open to all those interested in organising without leaders, with introductions from a Residents Group in St Pauls, and Haringay Solidarity Group (London)

Thursday 8 April, 7.30 – 9.30pm

Easton Community Centre, Kilburn Rd, Easton, BS5 6AW

With the downturn in workplace struggles over the last 20 years, some revolutionaries have looked towards involvement in local community issues & groups as an additional form of struggle – such as residents groups, community centres and local single-issue campaigns (defending nurseries, traffic calming etc). Others have focused on acting with those within their own ‘activist scene’. Some of course have tried to do both! This discussion will focus on breaking out of the activist scene; the pros & cons of involvement in local community organisations; and questions like these:
· Is dealing with dumped cars, litter, graffiti, crack houses & prostitution revolutionary; an example of genuine community solidarity; or just NIMBY (not in my back yard) campaigning?
· Are active & successful local campaigns powerful evidence of organising amongst ourselves for ourselves, or do we just end up doing the Council’s/Government’s job for them?
· Just because people take direct action on local issues, does this make them revolutionaries?
· What is revolutionary about getting dragged into local processes like working with the council & cops?
· What do local people think about revolutionaries getting involved in their groups?
· How many people in residents/community groups would really support a non-hierarchical, non-capitalist society? Will they once they are more involved in their local community?
· Haringay Solidarity Group (London) have been active for 14 years, involved in many local campaigns, supporting & setting up residents groups, even helping to organise a council-funded but independently run community festival, whilst maintaining their own revolutionary beliefs. What can we learn from them? For more info on HSG see www.HSG.cupboard.org

Meeting organised by the newly formed Bristol Anarchist Network (BAN) –  bristolanarchistnetwork@subsection.org.uk

BAN
- e-mail: bristolanarchistnetwork@subsection.org.uk

Comments

Hide the following 3 comments

improving peoples lives

31.03.2004 09:51

is improving peoples lives at grass roots level now seen as reformist? I think it is great that you revolutionairies have aother excuse for not doing anything(!)

destroyerofculture


no dichotomy there

31.03.2004 10:17

The process of pre-revolution is inevitably reformist as any established system will attempt to 'absorb sparks of discontent to prevent them catching fire' (can't remember who I'm quoting but its a good phrase). See the Suffragettes for example, or the rise (and fall) of 'democratic socialist' parties.

Tom


It's a question, not a party line!

31.03.2004 21:25

Hey destroyer, did you read the piece before your kneejerk response?
It's a discussion meeting to consider the issue, with intro from 2 speakers who have very much got involved in essentially reformist (see Tom's comment) local activity. Of course local activity is worthwhile, it's where we live, work & breathe. The question though is how to maintain a revolutionary perspective when your local activity get's results and you find yourself dealing with all sorts of local state agencies?
Try thinking next time!

mh