Skip to content or view screen version

MARSHALLS, HANDS OFF 9 LADIES!

9 Ladies Support Group | 26.03.2004 14:50 | Ecology | Sheffield

An office occupation of a Marshalls PLC building took place yesterday (25/03) in Elland, West Yorkshire, as a group of up to 25 activists from Yorkshire, Manchester, Derbyshire and Lancashire decided to ram home the message that corporate exploitation and destruction of our woodlands will not go unchallenged.




Marshalls is a huge multinational company specialising in landscape and construction materials, especially stone- or in other words, specialising in flattening and devastating our environment and then building on it with materials extracted, all for a very tidy profit. Marshalls is a particularly 'hot' target at the moment as its subsidiary Stancliffe Stone is behind the plan to quarry the hillside below Stanton Moor, right next to the Nine Ladies Stone Circle. This insidious plan to quarry a place of rare natural beauty in the middle of the Peak District National Park has been up to now unsuccessful due to the fight put up by the people at the Nine Ladies protest camp. Marshalls however has recently stepped up the pressure to evict the camp and go ahead with the quarrying despite objections from a whole range of actors, including the Peak District National Park Authority, - whose hands are tied as Marshalls own the mineral rights to the land and is making use of a 1952 loophole in the law- the CPRE, communities near by and members of 'Joe Public'.

The office occupation started at 9am when the protesters piled into the building, taking everyone in it by surprise. After running around all three floors for about an hour, giving out leaflets to employees and causing disruption to the company's normal working day, the protesters demands to meet face to face with one of the directors was met. An hour session of Q&A followed which in many ways felt like Prime Minister's Time as the Marshalls marketing director consistently evaded answering any questions about the company's involvement and responsibility in wreaking environmental destruction to the point. Completely dissatisfied with this type of corporate responsibility- where namely any responsibility is forever being deflected to someone else- protesters remained in the reception area for another hour and after that left on their own accord with no arrests being made. Protesters leaving the building warned Marshalls: BACK OFF OR WE'LL BE BACK!

And one final note...The police and local press that arrived on the scene and a number of employees proved overall very sympathetic. Not the same can be said of some other members of staff who attempted to drag or push people out, until it was politely pointed out to them that this constitutes assault that is. One particular member of staff went even further and flashed protesters his BNP membership card threatening to 'call in the boys'. So Marshalls are not only hell bent on destroying the Peak District but also employ fascists!

HANDS OFF NINE LADIES!
OUR WOODLANDS AND HERITAGE ARE NOT FOR SALE!

9 Ladies Support Group

Comments

Hide the following comment

Great stuff but political alternative necessary

30.03.2004 15:41

Good work at Marshalls, particularly the fact you communicated why you were doing it to the staff. The other major issue the article raises is the fascist threat in it's usual role of seeking to defend and prop up the worst of corporate exploiters etc, albeit in this case an individual employee brandishing a BNP card and threatening to get the boys in. The fact must be faced that the Nazis have had some success in building their noxious party through deception & electoral intervention.

The big questions all progressives must resolve are; Where is our party? How do we involve the masses of people who are unlikely to get involved in direct action heroism in the short to medium term, but who are non the less disenfranchised and pissed off at the symptoms of a profit before people society?

I think it dangerous, for now and in the current context to write off the political party form of organisation. Whilst accepting there are inevitable problems with the form and in itself not being enough to transform society, it is essential that an electoral political alternative be built. We have any disagreements in the course of building and shaping it but it is not a job that any of our consciences should allow us to abstain from.

RESPECT
www.respectcoalition.org

Paul