Fairford - A Hollow Victory?
Bristol ABC | 19.02.2004 12:20
...the court did back the police's contention that they were entitled - and obliged - to take preventative action as they "reasonably and honestly" believed that breaches of the peace would have occurred if the coaches reached Fairford.
Protesters have won their High Court battle over a police decision to detain them on their way to RAF Fairford for an anti-war demonstration.
Lawyers for half the 120 passengers, stopped from protesting last March, accused Gloucestershire Police of acting unlawfully.
Three coaches were stopped, searched and escorted back to London.
The court ruled that police() abused common law when they detained the demonstrators for more than two hours.
We think what the police are required to do in a situation like this is assess every individual separately
Solicitor John Halford
Lord Justice May and Mr Justice Harrison, sitting in London, ruled that the protesters' detention and forced return could also not be justified under the European Convention on Human Rights.
But the court did back the police's contention that they were entitled - and obliged - to take preventative action as they "reasonably and honestly" believed that breaches of the peace would have occurred if the coaches reached Fairford.
In its judgement, the court also said that there "...may be circumstances in which individual discrimination amongst a large numbers of uncooperative people may be impractical" and that this was such a case.
John Halford, solicitor for the protesters, told BBC News 24: "The court made it clear that we won on main issues and awarded all of our costs against the police.
"The main issue was unlawful detention and whether it was right to escort 120 protesters back to London and forcibly keeping them on the coach when they did so.
"We think what the police are required to do in a situation like this is assess every individual separately."
There is no word of criticism whatsoever in the judgement
Gloucestershire Police
Items removed by police from the coaches included masks, white overalls, scissors, five shields and body armour.
The protesters were on their way to join a demonstration against the war in Iraq() when they were detained for more than two hours.
They were then escorted back to London without stopping in a two and a half hour journey with no toilet facilities on the buses.
The circumstance and length of this detention were ruled by the court to be "wholly disproportionate".
A statement by Gloucestershire Police read: "The court has made it clear that the operational commander on the ground was lawfully entitled to turn those coaches away. In fact, it was his duty to do so.
"While the court has decided that it was wrong for the police to escort those coaches back, they made it clear that there was no basis whatsoever for doubting the Operational Commander's intentions or motives in doing so. He was acting in entirely good faith.
"In fact, there is no word of criticism whatsoever in the judgement."
"The fact that no one was hurt that day and that a lawful protest was able to take place with the cooperation of the local community and without disruption to military operations demonstrates that this operation was entirely successful."
Mr Halford said protesters planned to appeal the court's ruling that two articles of Human rights Law had not been breached.
Both the police and protesters have been given leave to appeal.
Lawyers for half the 120 passengers, stopped from protesting last March, accused Gloucestershire Police of acting unlawfully.
Three coaches were stopped, searched and escorted back to London.
The court ruled that police() abused common law when they detained the demonstrators for more than two hours.
We think what the police are required to do in a situation like this is assess every individual separately
Solicitor John Halford
Lord Justice May and Mr Justice Harrison, sitting in London, ruled that the protesters' detention and forced return could also not be justified under the European Convention on Human Rights.
But the court did back the police's contention that they were entitled - and obliged - to take preventative action as they "reasonably and honestly" believed that breaches of the peace would have occurred if the coaches reached Fairford.
In its judgement, the court also said that there "...may be circumstances in which individual discrimination amongst a large numbers of uncooperative people may be impractical" and that this was such a case.
John Halford, solicitor for the protesters, told BBC News 24: "The court made it clear that we won on main issues and awarded all of our costs against the police.
"The main issue was unlawful detention and whether it was right to escort 120 protesters back to London and forcibly keeping them on the coach when they did so.
"We think what the police are required to do in a situation like this is assess every individual separately."
There is no word of criticism whatsoever in the judgement
Gloucestershire Police
Items removed by police from the coaches included masks, white overalls, scissors, five shields and body armour.
The protesters were on their way to join a demonstration against the war in Iraq() when they were detained for more than two hours.
They were then escorted back to London without stopping in a two and a half hour journey with no toilet facilities on the buses.
The circumstance and length of this detention were ruled by the court to be "wholly disproportionate".
A statement by Gloucestershire Police read: "The court has made it clear that the operational commander on the ground was lawfully entitled to turn those coaches away. In fact, it was his duty to do so.
"While the court has decided that it was wrong for the police to escort those coaches back, they made it clear that there was no basis whatsoever for doubting the Operational Commander's intentions or motives in doing so. He was acting in entirely good faith.
"In fact, there is no word of criticism whatsoever in the judgement."
"The fact that no one was hurt that day and that a lawful protest was able to take place with the cooperation of the local community and without disruption to military operations demonstrates that this operation was entirely successful."
Mr Halford said protesters planned to appeal the court's ruling that two articles of Human rights Law had not been breached.
Both the police and protesters have been given leave to appeal.
Bristol ABC
Comments
Display the following 4 comments