Skip to content or view screen version

League Against Cruel Sports cull deer using cruel methods

Dave | 16.02.2004 18:01

League Against Cruel Sports accused over deer culling

The League Against Cruel Sports, the has been found using "illegal" methods to carry out culls of its own deer after a member of staff was filmed shooting them from the window of a Land Rover.

Graham Floyd was videoed repeatedly firing a rifle at red deer at the league's controversial Baronsdown sanctuary near Dulverton in Somerset, which was set up in 1959 to prevent deer being killed by hunts.


A survey by Government vets last year said the deer appeared healthy
The league has consistently claimed that it does not carry out "management culls" of its 250-strong herd because it does not believe that such methods are necessary, despite campaigners expressing worries that a proportion of the deer are suffering from malnutrition and diseases.

The carcasses of deer with tuberculosis have been found recently on land adjacent to the league's 225-acre sanctuary. Although a survey by government vets last year said that the deer appeared healthy, it concluded that a detailed health assessment was impossible without post mortem examinations which they were prevented from carrying out. Gordon Pearce, who was employed as a stalker for the league for 30 years, has become one of its most vocal critics because of his concern for the deers' welfare.


Gordon Pearce filmed the deer being culled at the sanctuary
In an attempt to expose what he sees as the organisation's "wickedness and hypocrisy", he filmed 11 apparently sick animals being killed by Mr Floyd since last October. The most recent was shot last Friday.

His footage shows Mr Floyd, who works at the sanctuary, herding the deer from behind the wheel of his four-wheel-drive vehicle before stopping to shoot them from his side window. He can then be seen getting out of the vehicle and attaching the carcasses to the back to drag them away to a burial pit.

According to the British Association for Shooting and Conservation, Mr Floyd's actions are against the law.

Simon Clarke, a spokesman for the association, said that his reaction on seeing the footage was one of "shock and amazement". He said: "The law was brought in to stop this kind of thing because driving after deer in a vehicle is liable to cause them immense stress. Stalking should be clean and quiet.

"It is hugely ironic that a group so against hunting would think it reasonable to go after deer in a vehicle. The man in the Land Rover is using it to split the herd up. It is basically like driving sheep. From their reactions it is clear that they are not wild deer, which the league has always maintained them to be.

"It is also apparent that there is no respect for hygiene and no inspection of the carcasses. Dragging them across the field is an appalling risk if the deer is infected with TB." He said that the association would call for a "full, independent analysis" of the deer population at Baronsdown and for "transparent" management procedures to be brought in.

Mr Pearce, who first voiced his concerns over the health of the deer 15 months ago, said: "Nothing has improved since then. It is because there are simply too many of them for the area and the supply of food available.

"Good deer management means keeping herds to a healthy size. This one needs to be reduced by 50 per cent. Otherwise the animals get sick and then have to be killed after a lot of suffering or are simply left to die in the undergrowth.

"The league are hypocrites. They claim they don't cull because there is no need and then they carry out this kind of shooting.

"Many of the deer are sick. Although I have filmed 11 being shot since October, I would calculate that the actual number that have died as a result of illness and malnutrition over the last three or four years is between 300 and 400.

"I have always been an opponent of hunting but the methods used by the Quantock Staghounds are far less cruel than what the league is doing."

Douglas Batchelor, the league's chief executive, said that although the deer were "wild" and were not fenced in, the sanctuary land could be categorised as enclosed. He said: "The land is technically enclosed."

Dave

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

That's nothing!

16.02.2004 21:26

That's nothing! I've seen him use much worse than a rifle on them deer!

Once he used a Kalashnikov and pump-action shotgun. And once a fishing rod with big hook.

And I've even seen him use industrial explosive on one occasion. Force feeding then press the plunger and BOOM! Not a pretty sight, I can tell you.

That League Against Cruel Sports just want to stop everyone else's fun so there's more of them deer for them.

Bastards!

Trolly


Interesting

17.02.2004 12:44

Interesting that after 24 hours of posting not one person has denied it happended or offered an explanation for the events and the prosecution. The League should be ashamed of itself.

Dave


silly boy

17.02.2004 12:48

Yeah, coz I bet the League Against Cruel Sports spend 24/7 monitoring IndyMedia websites!

Dave you really need to get a sense of perspective pal.

;-)


Deer Sanctuary

17.02.2004 15:22

The following is from the website of the IWMC, a bunch of loonies intent on using the worlds animal species for whatever they can, pro ivory, fur, bear hunting, whaling etc etc. But it is interesting in the context of the first posting here. Make of it what you will:

IWMC
World Conservation Trust



Out of the UK
A Deer Sanctuary Where it's Cruel to be "Kind"
by Janice Henke, Anthropologist



There is an astonishingly sad story out of the UK, where many people are known for their all abiding kindness to animals. In the case of the Baronsdown red deer sanctuary near Dulverton in Somerset, kind intentions and a refusal to act in the best interests of captive animals have resulted in miserable starvation of several hundred animals, held "safe" in an enclosure where hunters may not cull them.

Gordon Pearce is an employee of the sanctuary, and for many years it was his job to humanely kill sick or injured animals. He has finally "gone public" with the news that his organization, the League Against Cruel Sports, has for the past year, routinely refused to allow him to euthanize old or sick deer so that the others might have enough food, and be free from disease. He now reports that most animals in the herd of 350 are either sick or are dying from starvation, and that "if they were domestic stock, the owners would be prosecuted for neglect."

Other problems on the preserve are rampant inbreeding, as stags are seen to be breeding their own offspring or their own dams. Consequently, according to Pearce, the stock is developing animals that are inferior and stunted, as well as being starved from lack of adequate pasture and forage in their "sanctuary".

IWMC notes that a similar problem once occurred in the eastern US, in a forest preserve where hunting was prohibited. The white-tail deer there became so starved, inbred and scrawny that adult males weighed barely 35 pounds at maturity. This miserable failure at wildlife management was all because of a cultural preference by some to manage a deer herd by doing nothing to keep them at numbers suitable for their environment. When the carrying capacity of a forest is vastly exceeded by the animals fenced within it, miserable death by starvation is the inevitable result. This is not kindness in action. It is cruelty of a most basic and evil kind.

IWMC congratulates Mr. Pearce for bringing this situation to the attention of the public and the press. He is a man of integrity and courage. His efforts to persuade the League Against Cruel Sports to take appropriate action for the welfare of the herd have been in vain. IWMC urges that all good and kind people in the UK demand that action be immediately taken to end the suffering of those red deer, and to cause their legislators to ensure that such conditions shall never be allowed to be perpetrated again. Is it not ironic that such a call for action must come from all those devoted to the principles of proper wildlife management through hunting, given that this extreme cruelty is the work of anti-hunters?

Danger