Skip to content or view screen version

Nano particles from high DU Temp. cause of cancers and birth defects etc.

Dr Stefano Montanari | 13.02.2004 06:05 | Anti-militarism | Ecology | Health

Cancers among veterans and birth defects of their offspring and other "War" diseases are understood now as resulting from nanoparticles produced by high temperatures produced by DU use.




Antonietta Morena Gatti is a physicist and bioengineer, and is
the founder and the director of the Laboratory of Biomaterials of
the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (Italy). She is the
discoverer of the presence of micro- and nano-particles in
biological tissues and of their pathological effects. The European
Community appointed her Coordinator of the international
group in charge of the nanopathology study.

Stefano Montanari is a pharmacist and a scientific consultant. He
has collaborated with Dr Gatti for about 25 years.


THE SO-CALLED "BALKAN-SYNDROME": A BIO-
ENGINEERING APPROACH

Dr Antonietta M. Gatti - Dr Stefano Montanari


It is a well-known fact, widely reported by media, that a non-
negligible number of veterans of the Gulf War (1990-91) showed
what according to medicine are mutually unrelated symptoms. Some
of those can be attributed to stress: headache, for example, or sleep
disturbance, or forgetfulness, or an impaired concentration. Other
symptoms like fatigue, muscle and joint pain, and shortness of breath
are somewhat harder to classify, but cancers, various and, in some
cases, extremely unusual diseases of the genitourinary system, an
increased incidence of birth defects among veterans' children and
disorders of the blood and the haemopoietic organs must be due to
causes that cannot be legitimately ascribed to stress. Other
pathologies Gulf War veterans are suffering from, like sudden death
and Lou Gehrig's disease are under investigation as to their
meaningfulness.
But the problem is unfortunately wider and not limited to that group
of military population.
Very similar symptoms are being displayed by soldiers who served in
the former Yugoslavian territory during the so-called Balkan War,
made worse by an unusually high incidence of Hodgkin's and non-
Hodgkin's lymphomas. Staffers of humanitarian missions and
Yugoslavian residents as well are suffering from the same diseases.
Professor Edo Hasanbegovic, chief of the Paediatric Clinic of
Sarajevo, denounced how leukaemia is on the increase in children
throughout the Yugoslavian Federation, but mainly in children
coming from Velika, Kladusa and Buzim, towns located close to the
Croatian borderline.
An explanation to all that was offered when in March 2000 NATO
revealed that Depleted Uranium (DU) shells had been employed in
the Balkans and in 2001 traces of radioactivity were detected by the
United Nations Environment Protection agency not far from
Sarajevo, in a barracks at Han Pijesak and in two places inside a
factory in Hadzici.
It is a frequently observed fact that radioactivity is a triggering factor
to cancer, and Hiroshima and Nagasaki tought a painful lesson about
that. So, uranium was immediately seen as the obvious scapegoat to
blame.
For a better understanding, it is necessary to know that DU was used
to make a component of some shells used in that war, but
radioactivity played no role in that choice. High density and hardness
are the features that made those projectiles, called kinetic
penetrators, particularly fit for piercing even very thick armours. DU
is what is left over when most of the highly radioactive isotopes of
uranium are removed for use as nuclear fuel or nuclear weapons.
The DU used in armour-piercing munitions is also used in civilian
industry, primarily as ballast, for stabilizers in airplanes and boats.
As a matter of fact, uranium is a mixture of three isotopes: U235,
U234, and U238. When the content of U235 is below 0.711%, uranium is
classified as "depleted", and the blend used in the Balkans contained
less than 0.2% of that isotope.
DU is approximately 40 percent less radioactive than natural
uranium and emits alpha and beta particles, and gamma rays. Alpha
particles can hardly pass through the skin, while beta particles are
blocked by most garments, and the amount of gamma rays, a form of
highly penetrating energy, emitted by DU is very low.
The radioactivity produced by those weapons is certainly not healthy,
but its full responsibility for such an unusual health situation looks at
least doubtful if observed from a scientific standpoint.
In addition to that, another piece of evidence is raising a further
doubt about the radioactive origin of the pathologies: A higher-than-
expected quantity of lymphomas and symptoms identical to those
suffered from by the Balkan War's veterans was observed in Italian
soldiers who had never served in any theatre of war nor had ever
come near to radioactive weapons. The condition all those soldiers
shared was serving in firing grounds.
In the meantime, someone tried to blame the multiple vaccinations
soldiers underwent during the so-called Operation Desert Storm, but
without being able to give any scientific demonstration to that thesis.
As a matter of fact, in addition to the usual vaccines against tetanus-
diphtheria, hepatitis B, poliovirus, meningococcal, typhoid and
yellow fever, the American troops were treated with Botulinum
Pentavalent, unlicensed in the United States, intended to counteract
botulism.
Then they were treated with a vaccine against anthrax, a drug proven
to be teratogenic. In fact, women receiving it are warned not to have
children for at least three years.
Finally troops received Pyridostigmine bromide, not a vaccine, but a
pre-treatment against nerve agents. That drug, normally used for
myasthenia gravis, is not approved by the Food and Drug
Administration as a nerve gas antidote and its side effects are
potentially very dangerous.
But those medicines were administered to US troops only, while the
Gulf War Syndrome affected also civilians and soldiers of other
nationalities.
Thus, no answer was given to the question: why do people living in
theatres of war and soldiers working under particular conditions
contract those diseases with such an alarming frequency?
Our Laboratory of Biomaterials of the University of Modena and
Reggio Emilia (Italy) is engaged in checking bioptic and autoptic
samples coming from patients belonging in the classes described
above. It is an indisputable fact that all samples contain inorganic
micro- and nano-particles, while it may be interesting to observe that
none of them show any trace of uranium.
From the technical point of view, those very small fragments can be
detected by using an innovative technique of electronic microscopy
we developed and that has been already described in literature.
What we found were very small bits, sometimes agglomerated, of
simple or combined metals: Fe-Si, Cu-Cl-Zn, Si-Ti-Fe-Al, Si-Bi, Si-
Pb, Fe-Cu-Zn, Cr-Fe-Ni, Fe-Mn and, but just once, Zr alone.
The spherical shape, hollow in the larger sizes, of many particles
proves their formation under a very high temperature, a condition
compatible with that of the explosion of a DU shell.
DU projectiles hit very different targets, but specially buildings and
armaments like, for example, tanks, and when they do, the
temperature in the core of the explosion exceeds 3,000°C, which is
more than enough to have all solid matter sublime and, in some
cases, form new metal alloys. That gas expands over a large volume
of atmosphere, then, rapidly, the matter becomes solid again taking
the shape of very small spheres (down to 10-8 m diameter), stays
suspended in the air and is carried away over distances depending on
atmospheric conditions like wind, rain, snow and pressure. This
phenomenon was studied in 1977-78 at the US Air Force base of
Leglin (Fla).
After some time, all the air-borne particles fall slowly down and
settle on grass, vegetables, fruit or expanses of water where they
become inevitably a guest of food and drink to animals and men
alike. Even if that unwanted presence is known in advance - but very
often it is utterly ignored - getting rid completely of inorganic
particles can be very difficult. A good wash eliminates a great
quantity of debris from fruit or vegetables, but cauliflowers, for
example, cannot be cleaned thoroughly because of their rough
surface, while those particles that settle in the tissues of animals that
ate contaminated grass and men eat as meat can't be taken away at
all.
Keeping in mind the well-known, even if never widely publicized,
phenomenon studied at Leglin and the new science of nano-
pathology, an explanation to the unanswered question becomes easy.
People present in firing grounds and in the theatres of war, and being
a soldier or a civilian makes no difference, breathe in micro- and
nano-particles while they are suspended in the air as an aerosol, then
eat and drink them along with vegetables and water.
We have amply demonstrated with our researches that once debris
that size (10-9 - 10-5 m) enter the body, be it via the digestive or the
respiratory system, they can easily negotiate the luminal tissues and
either be captured by the tissue itself which acts the way a filter
does, or be transported by the blood or the lymph until they end their
travel in some organ (for instance the kidneys and the liver). Lymph
nodes, for example, are the organs where lymphomas start and
develop and where, in all pathological cases checked, we found the
presence of inorganic particles. But also all the other pathologic
specimens we had the possibility to observe show clearly and without
any single exception the presence of debris.
It is important to underline that none of the particles we found is
biodegradable.
Just to give a further confirmation about the applicability of the
theory according to which the so-called Balkan Syndrome has an
environmental, nanopathological origin, particles found in the
diseased tissues of soldiers and civilians, and particles found in the
ground of the territories where the pathologies were contracted are
mutually compatible.
If no uranium was ever detected, that does not necessarily mean there
is none somewhere in the tissues of the patients. The fact is likely to
be due to its quantity, which is extremely scarce when compared with
the huge masses of the targets that sublime and that contain no such
element. It is also possible that uranium particles had been captured
by tissues but, probably because they did not reach a critical
threshold, did not trigger any disease and, as a consequence, we did
not have the chance to receive and study the samples.
In conclusion, DU's responsibility is only indirect, and it is not its
radioactivity to blame, but the very high temperature that uranium
produces once the shells of which it is a component hit the mark.
It is then possible that the Balkan Syndrome has a multi-factorial
origin including radioactivity and vaccinations, but the main cause is
without any doubt a nanopathological one.

For further information about nanopathology
www.biomat.unimo.it/eng/nanopat.htm

******************************************************************************
***************
The Campaign Against Depleted Uranium, Bridge 5 Mill, 22a
Beswick Street,
Ancoats, Manchester, M4 7HR Tel./Fax.: +44 (0)161 273 8293
E-Mail  info@cadu.org.uk Website:  http://www.cadu.org.uk



To subscribe to this group send a message to  du-list-subscribe@yahoogroups.com. In the body of the message type subscribe and send.

Dr Stefano Montanari
- Homepage: http://www.cadu.org.uk

Comments

Hide the following 7 comments

Hyperbole ?

14.02.2004 05:44

Dose the article you have reproduced actually have anything to do with "The Campaign Against Depleted Uranium" ? Or have you just made it look as if it is sanctioned by CADU ?

I notice you cite CADU as your home page, yet you provide a subscription address to a yahoo group that has nothing to do with CADU.

I put "THE SO-CALLED "BALKAN-SYNDROME": A BIO-ENGINEERING APPROACH" into google but could only find one reference to it on some obscure Italian member list.

Whilst the article covered some interesting points, it could also be said to have dispelled the vaccine damage theory...

I fully agree that DU is responsible for some GWV illnesses, but that dosen't mean others were not made ill by the multiple vaccines they were given containing poisons such as mercury and squalene. Your article seems to dispel this theory.....

Columbo


also

14.02.2004 15:23

the concept of a nano-particle at high temperature???

isn't that what radiation IS????

...is this an exercise in semantic redefining?

Captain Wardrobe


Idustry funded nano white lies only confuse the issue...

17.02.2004 15:53


Why has this spoof article not be removed ?

Not part of the American Council for Science and Health, or HealthWatch


DU spoof

18.02.2004 08:44

Dear Sirs,

A few days ago I sent a brief article about the connections between nanoparticles and the Balkan Syndrome to the site Indymedia.
The studies we are carrying out are funded by the European Community, involve, among other institutions, the University of Modena, the University of Cambridge and the University of Mainz, and deal with nanopathologies, an enormous field of scientific interest which the Balkan Syndrome is only a comparatively small part of.
I sent that simple article because I felt it to be my duty to do so. And I felt it to be my duty because Depleted Uranium has become an issue for supporters of different factions who, very often, have not the least scientific knowledge and are not aware of what they are really supporting.
First of all, we are not campaigning against or pro anything. We are just scientists and have no interest outside our researches. If, for reasons I am not interested in fathoming, "Columbo" wishes to demonstrate that vaccines are to blame, he is free to undertake a scientific investigation the way we did. From a merely personal point of view, I agree that the cocktail administered to the soldiers does not sound particularly healthy, but I have no scientific elements to be able to judge. In any case, "Columbo" ought to know that Science (capital letter) has no colour.
As to "Captain Wardrobe", I am afraid his notions are not clear. Uranium emits alpha, beta and gamma radiations, and these have nothing to do with the mechanism of sublimation.
But the most alarming comment is the brief one coming from "Not part of the American Council for Science and Health, or HealthWatch". For reasons unknown, the author claims 1) that we are funded by industry 2) that we are telling lies, and 3) that our "spoof" should be removed.
1) If "Not part of the American Council for Science and Health, or HealthWatch" only knew the problems we are facing with industry and military organizations because of the results of our studies, he/she would not have written what he/she wrote.
2) "Not part of the American Council for Science and Health, or HealthWatch" is invited to visit our laboratory, check our papers, look at how we work, ask Cambridge and Mainz, read specialized literature and attend specialized congresses. To date no scientist could find any fault in our methods and results, but maybe we could learn something from "Not part of the American Council for Science and Health, or HealthWatch".
3) Traditionally, ignorance and censorship get along well.
Just for your information, Dr Gatti is recognized as the leading scientist in the field.

Yours sincerely,

Dr. Stefano Montanari

Stefano Montanari
mail e-mail: stefano.montanari29@tin.it


"Science has no colour..."

18.02.2004 17:51

Yeh right !

Perhaps you can address these questions:

(1) Again, does the article you have reproduced actually have anything to do with "The Campaign Against Depleted Uranium, or have you just made it look as if it is sanctioned by CADU ?


(2) Also maybe you can explain why non of the French Gulf war 1 vets (who never received the vaccines) have no signs of a Gulf war syndrome ? Surely they would have been exposed to the same nano particles from high DU Temp ?


(3) How do you explain those who fell ill after receiving the vaccines, but who were never actually deployed to the Gulf, hence were never exposed burning DU particles ?


(4) Does the infamous Professor Simon Wessely (Cambridge) have anything to do with your research ?


Note:

Wessely leads a group of U.K. doctors, mostly but not exclusively psychiatrists, who have colloquially become known as the "Wessely School". Wessely is now Professor of Epidemiological and Liaison Psychiatry at Guys, King's and St Thomas' School of Medicine, London and the Institute of Psychiatry, where he is Director of both the C.F.S. Research Unit and the Gulf War Illness Research Unit. He is well-known for his strongly-held beliefs that neither M.E. nor Gulf War Syndrome exists, and that such patients are mentally, not physically ill. . . . Wessely's beliefs, however, have flooded the U.K. literature; he is adviser to the U.K. Government and to the Ministry of Defence and his wife (psychiatrist Dr Clare Garada) is Senior Policy Adviser to the Department of Health. . . . It is the case that some of those doctors have been funded by sources with links to the same industry which manufactures the chemicals which may be contributing to the rise in incidence of chemically-induced M.E./I.C.D.-C.F.S. [I.C.D. - International Classification of Diseases]. They have also been funded by the insurance industry and by private interests such as The Linbury Trust which belongs to the Sainsbury (supermarket) family. . . . Since 1996, David Sainsbury (now Lord Sainsbury of Turville) had donated £7,000,000 to the U.K. Labour Party. He is currently Minister for Science; as such he has responsibility for the Office of Science and Technology and the Chemical and Biotechnology industries, as well as all the Research Councils, including the Medical Research Council (M.R.C.). . . . The Office of Science and Technology monitors all government funding of research grants and controls official science policy and it is "policy" which determines the research which is funded. "The Department funds research to support policy". (Hansard, 11th May 2000). . . . Since 1988, psychiatrists of the "Wessely School" have been funded not only by the M.R.C. but by Wellcome Training Fellowships in Clinical Epidemiology; . . . by the Wellcome Trust; by I.C.I. Pharmaceuticals; by Pfizer U.K.; by Duphar Pharmaceuticals; by The Linbury Trust; by the Medical Policy Group of the Department of Social Security; by the Department of Health, . . . and by the United States Department of Defense.
 http://www.alor.org/Britain/OnTargetBritainJune2003.htm


Wessely is also policy advisor to the industry funded American Council for Science and Health, and also a member of HealthWatch (a UK affiliate of ACSH).

The American Council on Science and Health has received funds from food processing and beverage corporations including Burger King, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, NutraSweet and Nestlé USA, as well as chemical, oil and pharmaceutical companies such as Monsanto, Dow USA, Exxon, Union Carbide and others. Its executive director, portrayed in the mass media as an independent scientist, defends petrochemical companies, the nutritional values of fast foods, and the safety of saccharin, pesticides and growth hormones for dairy cows. She claims that the U.S. government spends far too much on investigating unproven health risks such as dioxin and pesticides because of the public's "unfounded fears of man-made chemicals and their perception of these chemicals as carcinogens."(FN6)

The American Council on Science and Health is one of many corporate front groups which allow industry-funded experts to pose as independent scientists to promote corporate causes. Chemical and nuclear industry front groups with scientific sounding names publish pamphlets that are 'peer reviewed' by industry scientists rather than papers in established academic journals.(FN7) Megalli and Friedman point out: "Contrary to their names, these groups often disregard compelling scientific evidence to further their viewpoints, arguing that pesticides are not harmful, saccharin is not carcinogenic, or that global warming is a myth. By sounding scientific, they seek to manipulate the public's trust."(FN8)
 http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/sbeder/PR.html


Dr Stefano Montanari wrote:

"To date no scientist could find any fault in our methods and results".

Well in that case you will be able to give the reference to your peer reviewed study in a recognised medical journal in order for it to be verified as authentic.


Oh, and just one more thing before you go:

First award for depleted uranium poisoning claim
 http://vitw.us/mic/archives/000522.html

Columbo


Dr

20.02.2004 13:21

Thanks for your message. Let me introduce myself, at first.
I am a physicist, PhD in Bioengineering and chief of the Laboratory of Biomaterials at the University of Modena and ReggioEmilia. I am also Member of the European Scientific Committee DG- SANCO on Medicinal Products and Medical Devices and member of the Euroepan Task Force on the In vitro tests for the biocompatibility at the European Joint Research Center of Ispra. (ITALY)
At present I am international coordinator of a European project on the Role of micro and nanoparticles in inducing pathologies (NANOPATHOLOGY) together the University of Cambridge, University of Mainz and Philips.

So I am studying the impact of the environmental and food pollution on the human health. For that we developed an innovative diagnostic to see the foreign bodies inside the pathological tissues. I investigated also some soldiers who served in Balkans and developed cancers or Hodgkin's Limphoma. At present we are collaborating also with the University of Sarajevo and I have some cases of civilians with the same diseases. I investigated only one case affected by the Gulf War syndrome (I had no possibility to contact the American soldiers, until now)and I found toxic nanoparticles in the internal organs.
Until now I did not find Uranium inside the pathological tissue I examined except in a civilian of Sarajevo.
But I found many debris of not biocompatible materials as Tungsten, Cobalt, Antimony, Mercury Iron, Chromium, Nickel etc. They are not biocomaptible, they are cancerogenic.
Sometimes the sizes of the particles were very small, below the micron. They are very dangerous because they can enter into the cell and its nucleous.
I found also foreign bodies in the sperma by means a new technique. When these analyses are positive namely foreign bodies are present in sperma we suggest the assisted fertilization. 6 months of delay from the return from the war field are not sufficient. When foreign bodies are inside the human body there is no way to eliminate them. They can only accumulate and concentrate in some specific organs or tissues. If the threshold concentration is reached, the disease starts and it dependa on the size and chemistry of the particles.
The initial task was the search of Uranium dust, but I did not find any trace of that in the sections I observed (The sections came from the paraffin block with the biopsy or surgical sample who served for the diagnosis and archived in the hospitals), but I found not biocompatible, not biodegradable metallic dust, that can be surely present in the environment after the explosion of weapons developing high blast temperatures. War creates a new pollution which effects on nature and humans are unknown. So if people or animals are in this new polluted environment they have the possibility to inhalate or digest them with food.
If some soldiers want their biopsy analyzed with this new technique, they can contact me. The cost is not very high and a report with the images of the debris found in the tissues plus the chemical compositions can be done.

Antonietta Gatti
mail e-mail: gatti@unimo.it
- Homepage: http://www.biomat.unimo.it


CADU on original posting (for the benefit of "Columbo")

06.04.2004 22:48

I posted this original item for Gatti & Co, without request on their part and apologise for confusing Columo. It came to me via the  du-list@yahoo.com and was posted there by a CADU member.
I put the CADU web address on to help those who have little or no knowledge of the DU issue to gain some introduction.
The good Italian doctors have no relationship with CADU to my knowledge.
I have since sent the item to various media workers including Juan Gonzalez at nydailynews to offer a means of testing to people who may have concerns of DU associated contamination from the recent USUK use of WMD in the attack of Iraq.
Thank you Columbo for your input and interesting information.

Verite Sparks