The origin of the war on terrorism. Who is really to blame?
British army general | 10.02.2004 13:02
This war on terrorism was not started by Bush or Blair it started by the middle eastern nations. Begining with their allying themselves with Hitler in WW2, then starting a War that continues to this very day with our treaty signed ally, Israel and ourselves. Unable to face the Western powers, or the USA in anything remotely resembling formal open warfare the anti western anti semetic peoples have resorted to terrorist activities. These are fully sponsored by nations such as Iraq was, and Iran, Syria, Jordan, S, Arabia, Lybia, etc. ARE. As they fight the USA, they have found support over the years from the likes of the USSR, N. Korea, and Communist China. The evidence is clear as glass IF you bother to examine their arms. Communist block almost exclusively.
You will note that all the forementioned opposition nations are Facist governments. they permit no civil rights, no due process, no free press, opress their citizens with force of arms, use torture , rape, and murder as tools of their statecraft. In asddition they "export" their terrorism. Since WW2 we have seen examples in N. Ireland, Germany, France (remember the 60's & 70's assassinations) Italy, South East Asia, the Phillipenes, Central and south America, most African Nations, India, and the USA. These in addition to the mutual infighting ecopnomic and shooting wars to decide who gets to be the 20th Century , now 21.st Century Saladin.
Since this has been going on, with no abatement lasting more than a week since the late 1930's (and in the case of Lybia, in one form or another since the mid to late 1700's, Barbary pirates etc etc.) naturally the pacifists/leftists/liberals blame the fact we are now WINNING the war on terrorisn on George Bush junoir AS IF HE started the conflict. PLEASE, place the blame where in belongs! On the oil rich fascists and their sponsorship of warfare by terrorism.
What the USA under GB2's presidency has done is enter into the War by defeating Saddam and his sons. By defeating the Taliban and Bin Ladin. By making it clear that we WILL get around to you if you do not give up this mindless war. One way or another, the USA can and will put you out of business. Of course, defending ourselves and our allies against these fascists is a terrible thing according to the anti-war movement. conveniently overlooking the fact that there is no alternative to war.
Since this has been going on, with no abatement lasting more than a week since the late 1930's (and in the case of Lybia, in one form or another since the mid to late 1700's, Barbary pirates etc etc.) naturally the pacifists/leftists/liberals blame the fact we are now WINNING the war on terrorisn on George Bush junoir AS IF HE started the conflict. PLEASE, place the blame where in belongs! On the oil rich fascists and their sponsorship of warfare by terrorism.
What the USA under GB2's presidency has done is enter into the War by defeating Saddam and his sons. By defeating the Taliban and Bin Ladin. By making it clear that we WILL get around to you if you do not give up this mindless war. One way or another, the USA can and will put you out of business. Of course, defending ourselves and our allies against these fascists is a terrible thing according to the anti-war movement. conveniently overlooking the fact that there is no alternative to war.
British army general
Comments
Hide the following comment
Speeeling rong agen
10.02.2004 14:15
Use your spellchecker.
It's "Philippines"
T Cher