U.K. Anti-Rave Legislation 2004
Access All Areas | 06.02.2004 02:01 | Culture | Repression
Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 - section 63 "Raves - Powers to remove persons attending or preparing for a rave"
U.K. Anti-Rave Legislation 2004
- The totalitarian state of the United Kingdom -
Featured article in the Active! section
on Access All Areas website:
http://www.accessallareas.org
The totalitarian state of the United Kingdom is no longer the once futuristic Orwellian vision of "1984" but a prediction only twenty years too early to the day of the reality that we now live in.
For thousands of years of human history people in tribes, societies and civilisations have gathered in the evenings in groups to the music of the drums - dancing, celebrating and living.
You might be one of those weird and bizarre people who think that 20 people getting together to listen to music is a pretty fun and social thing .. as of this week in the year of our government 2004 the assembly of 20 people, be it even on private land, "at which amplified music is played at night (with or without intermissions); and (b) 'music' includes sounds wholly or predominantly characterised by the emission of a succession of repetitive beats." - (listening to music!) - is now illegal and classified as an "anti-social" public nuisance as defined in the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 - section 63 "Raves - Powers to remove persons attending or preparing for a rave" amended by the Anti-social Behaviour act 2003 section 58 "Raves" reducing the permitted numbers gathered in the open air for a rave (as trespassers or not) from 100 to 20 and additionally covering gatherings of 20 or more who are trespassing on land which is not in the open air (ie within a building).
Powers are unchanged with the addition of a further offence of making preparations for or attending a gathering subject to a direction within 24 hours of the direction. Yes - it is an offence to go to, or even prepare to go to a rave, within 24 hours of being stopped from visiting another one. A person guilty of an offence under this subsection is "liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three months or a fine not exceeding level 4 on the standard scale, or both."
We have now made the very human nature illegal, denying recognition of whom and what we actually are.
Liberty spokesperson Barry Hugill condemned the new laws: 'This is totally unacceptable, it should only be a crime to commit a crime. The government is introducing constraints and no-go areas the like of which haven't existed since wartime'.
Of course, some people argue that we are at war. At war against a something, a phenomenon, which is also a result of denying to recognise the basic and fundamental human requirements for existence - the concept of "terrorism".
Just keep dreaming about the right to assemble and express your opinion in these matters - be it for or against the idea that we should drop more bombs on people or be allowed to listen to music - there is now a law stating that just two people can constitute a "public assembly" giving the police power to impose conditions. In case two million people don't turn up again on the next international day of action and national anti-war demo on the 20th of March 2004 the limit of two people is probably a safe level to catch any level of uncomfortable expression.
Are two people still allowed to assemble to kiss? Love each other?
Answer 1 - The European Convention on Human Rights: Article 11 - "Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association with others, including the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.", Article 10 - "Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. this right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information an ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers".
Answer 2: David Blunkett (a statement required under section 19(1)(a) of the Human Rights Act 1998) - In my view the provisions of the Anti-social Behaviour Bill are compatible with the The European Convention on Human Rights.
Answer 3: "Freedom of speech is a right to be fought for, not a blessing to be wished for.", United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan, the Director-General of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Federico Mayor, and the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Mary Robinson, on the occasion of World Press Freedom Day, 3 May 1999.
Fight!
- The totalitarian state of the United Kingdom -
Featured article in the Active! section
on Access All Areas website:
http://www.accessallareas.org The totalitarian state of the United Kingdom is no longer the once futuristic Orwellian vision of "1984" but a prediction only twenty years too early to the day of the reality that we now live in.
For thousands of years of human history people in tribes, societies and civilisations have gathered in the evenings in groups to the music of the drums - dancing, celebrating and living.
You might be one of those weird and bizarre people who think that 20 people getting together to listen to music is a pretty fun and social thing .. as of this week in the year of our government 2004 the assembly of 20 people, be it even on private land, "at which amplified music is played at night (with or without intermissions); and (b) 'music' includes sounds wholly or predominantly characterised by the emission of a succession of repetitive beats." - (listening to music!) - is now illegal and classified as an "anti-social" public nuisance as defined in the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 - section 63 "Raves - Powers to remove persons attending or preparing for a rave" amended by the Anti-social Behaviour act 2003 section 58 "Raves" reducing the permitted numbers gathered in the open air for a rave (as trespassers or not) from 100 to 20 and additionally covering gatherings of 20 or more who are trespassing on land which is not in the open air (ie within a building).
Powers are unchanged with the addition of a further offence of making preparations for or attending a gathering subject to a direction within 24 hours of the direction. Yes - it is an offence to go to, or even prepare to go to a rave, within 24 hours of being stopped from visiting another one. A person guilty of an offence under this subsection is "liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three months or a fine not exceeding level 4 on the standard scale, or both."
We have now made the very human nature illegal, denying recognition of whom and what we actually are.
Liberty spokesperson Barry Hugill condemned the new laws: 'This is totally unacceptable, it should only be a crime to commit a crime. The government is introducing constraints and no-go areas the like of which haven't existed since wartime'.
Of course, some people argue that we are at war. At war against a something, a phenomenon, which is also a result of denying to recognise the basic and fundamental human requirements for existence - the concept of "terrorism".
Just keep dreaming about the right to assemble and express your opinion in these matters - be it for or against the idea that we should drop more bombs on people or be allowed to listen to music - there is now a law stating that just two people can constitute a "public assembly" giving the police power to impose conditions. In case two million people don't turn up again on the next international day of action and national anti-war demo on the 20th of March 2004 the limit of two people is probably a safe level to catch any level of uncomfortable expression.
Are two people still allowed to assemble to kiss? Love each other?
Answer 1 - The European Convention on Human Rights: Article 11 - "Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association with others, including the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.", Article 10 - "Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. this right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information an ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers".
Answer 2: David Blunkett (a statement required under section 19(1)(a) of the Human Rights Act 1998) - In my view the provisions of the Anti-social Behaviour Bill are compatible with the The European Convention on Human Rights.
Answer 3: "Freedom of speech is a right to be fought for, not a blessing to be wished for.", United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan, the Director-General of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Federico Mayor, and the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Mary Robinson, on the occasion of World Press Freedom Day, 3 May 1999.
Fight!
Access All Areas
Homepage:
http://www.accessallareas.org
Comments
Hide the following 5 comments
as long as it only concerns "trance"...
06.02.2004 13:16
wrongdoer
so you won't stand up for ....
06.02.2004 21:21
can't see much wrong with that myself and i don't care what sort of music people want to dance too. thats missing the point.
how far can it go before we say stop?
who owns us?
heather
e-mail:
roserat@btinternet.com
Totalitarian my arse...
08.02.2004 22:56
Oh come off it, yes there are some unpleasant aspects to the UK govt but "totalitarian" is NOT a word I would describe them as. You want to know about totalitarian states?? Then bog off to Colombia, Saudi Arabia, or North Korea, and you'll find that we get off quite lightly as far as state oppression is concerned. Ok the CJA is harsh but at least in this country you have freedom of religion, movement, and the ability to criticise the goverment - which is far more than the people in the three examples mentioned above get.
anti-extemist
Actually
09.02.2004 11:42
It looks like the governent is prepared to go 'traditional' on us if the widespread discontent over Iraq etc turns into calls for greater democracy. Just look at their proposals; Provisions for the suspension of parliament and banning of public assembelies (Civil Contingencies Bill), Compulsory biometric national ID cards, proposals floated for secret trials with secret evidence to try enemies of the State.
The public response to that last proposal demonstrates why 'traditional' totalitarianism is inferior as a means of control to our version; If the state goes round blatantly oppressing the majority of people, then people get pissed off and overthrow the government at the soonest opportunity. So 'elective-oligarchies' are really the modern form of totalitarian rule. Overt repression is confined to the margins (ie demonstrators), and internalised self-censorship in the media replaces the state censors of old.
Oh yeah, Rave On!
TG
People should be able to listen to what they want
19.04.2004 13:53
all music is situational, its there for a purpose, dance music is there to dance to. i cant exactly see an orchestra playin at a rave, because people go there to dance!
I love going to raves, but also play in a brass band, and have sung with cathedral choirs. stop being a music snob, and let people listen to whatever they want, be it in a rave or not!
Martyn Sutcliffe