Skip to content or view screen version

Hutton Inquiry farce as leading scientists question Kelly Suicide verdict

anon | 28.01.2004 18:07

Sensation as Hutton report publihed as three medical experts question ‘suicide’ of scientist

Front-Page article from Tuesday 27th issue of the London Evening Standard

No web ref as it was not published on the London Evening Standard website, which is: www.thisislondon.co.uk

Was Kelly Murdered?

Three medical experts today cast serious doubts over how weapons expert David Kelly is believed to have died.

They gave a detailed analysis of the circumstances of his death, raising the possibility that Dr. Kelly did not take his own life but in fact murdered. The specialists also called for a full inquest.

The intervention came the day before publication of Lord Hutton’s report into Dr Kelly’s death.

The UN weapons inspector was found near his Oxfordshire home last July. He had been named as the source of a BBC report claiming the Government “sexed up” a dossier on the threat from Iraq.

It was believed that he killed himself after becoming embroiled in a furious row between the Government and the BBC over the reasons for going to war against Saddam Hussain.

A pathologist told the Hutton Inquiry that he thought Dr Kelly had bled to death from a self-inflicted wound on his left wrist, with a drugs overdose listed as a possible contributing factor. But consultant surgeon David Halpin, speaking on behalf of a group of specialists, said today they believe it “improbable” that he could have bled to death from such a cut.

They said he would have had to have lost five pints of blood to have died that way. But from the cut found on his wrist he was unlikely to have lost more than a pint. The ambulance crew at the scene reported minimal loss of blood.

Mr Halpin and his colleagues also said the level of the painkiller Co-proxamol found in his system was far from enough to have killed him.

In a letter to the Guardian the specialists detailed flaws in the official explanation. The experts told the Evening Standard that they were not accusing anyone of murder but added: “The picture is not a happy one.”

Mr Halpin said: “There are all sorts of evidence that are most unsatisfactory. We would like this inquest reopened, so that in this very important case, no stone is left unturned. As specialist medical professionals, we do not consider the evidence given at the Hutton Inquiry has demonstrated that Dr Kelly committed suicide.

“We find it difficult to accept that a cut, such as the one described, could result in death. It is very unlikely that this injury would have been fatal.”

He added: “Because the case was so high profile, I imagined that the autopsy and inquest would be carried out to the highest standard that our state could muster. But the more I thought about it, the less certain I became that he could have died from a cut to the left wrist.”

During the Hutton Inquiry forensic pathologist Dr Nicholas Hunt concluded that the scientist bled to death.

Dr Kelly’s body was found slumped near a tree in woods. Lying next to him were the Scout knife he had since a boy, his watch, flat cap, glasses, a container of his wife’s painkillers and a bottle of water.

Dr Hunt told the Inquiry that the only artery involved – the ulnar artery – had been completely sliced through.

Mr Halpin said: “Arteries in the wrist are of a matchstick thickness and severing them does not lead to life-threatening blood loss. When the artery is completely transected, as apparently happened here in this case, it retracts and the blood begins to clot. This limits the blood loss.”

Mr Halpin’s views are supported by diagnostic radiologist Stephen Frost and Searle Sennett, a specialist in anaesthesiology. Mr Halpin is a former consultant at Torbay Hospital in Devon. Mr Sennett is a fellow of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and Mr Frost is a former consultant at Westminster Hospital.

Dr Kelly was found to have taken the painkiller Co-proxamol – but only a small amount. The three specialists said: “We dispute that Dr Kelly died from haemorrhage or from Co-proxamol ingestion or both.” Today Oxfordshire coroner Nicholas Gardiner, who is considering holding a full inquest, revealed he had received “numerous” letters questioning the account given to the Inquiry.

Mr Gardiner formally handed over powers of his inquest to Lord Hutton after the Lord Chancellor, Lord Falconer, used a little known law to order that it be combined with the public inquiry. “I expect to have a hearing in March at which I will make a ruling”, said Mr Gardiner today [Tues 27th].

anon

Comments

Hide the following 12 comments

find it here

28.01.2004 18:25

 http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/articles/8833326?source=Ev

my page on kelly
 http://www.wardrobe.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/murder_inc/kelly.html



I watched the report and gradually it dawned on me during the Prime ministers
speech in Parliament, that the whole business was a set up from the start...


Dr Kelly was murdered in order to establish an enquiry ...a fixed process, which would
exhonerate the war machine from all responsibility in proscecuting an illegal military action.

They can now seem untouchable and in the eyes of the public be morally justified in the next phase
of the war on terror...

SO SAD...AND SICKENING!!!!

a final act as Lord Hutton retires...

Through Northern Ireland to Pinochet to Shayler
the law lord has been a state puppet extrodinaire...good riddance!
love

Captain Wardrobe


Amazing

28.01.2004 19:15

It was very clever, actually. From the beginning he said 'I will not examine the issue of whether or not the claim about weapons of mass destruction was true or not', becuase it was outside of his re-mit. Instead, he just focused on the accusation that the ministers had told the intelligence agencies to put in a delibertaely false '45-minues' claim. But he didn't look into the fact that the claim was wrong!!!
The report doesn't change the fact that there ARE no weapons of mass destruction, and the intelligence WAS wrong. So really there should be an inquiry into why our intelligence services were so wrong. And then I think you might find some very sinister motives at work, because I'm sure the intelligence wasn't wrong because of incompetence.

But of course, any inquiry would itself be compromised. I was watching Lord Hutton and I realised that this was really a matter of the master reading a report about the pupil. So much is attributed towards 'the government', and Tony Blair, but in reality they are not real power. Real power lies in the hands of some very old and powerful institutions, and Lord Hutton seemed to me to be the voice of these institutions, letting their servant off the hook. I've never really hated Blair, he's just an old schoolboy trapped in powergames he doesn't really understand. Real power is hidden. Get rid of Blair, and nothing changes. In fact, better Blair than Michael Howard. Who are the real villains, and where do they live?

Hermes


View From Across The Pond

28.01.2004 20:28

pic
pic

Hutton Report Released

View From Across The Pond


Re: I think the report was fairly and honestly done

28.01.2004 20:54

No WMD were found so its now pretty obvious that the prewar evidence Blair presented was "sexed up". How can Hutton criticize the BBC for a report that now appears to be 100% validated? Not only was the 45 min claim a complete fabrication but most of the rest of the evidence used in the buildup to the war was too. Hutton's attack on the BBC amounts to an attack on freedom of the press. The message is clear that if the BBC even mentions that something the government says may not be true, they will be held to much higher standards than the government (whose own evidence for the war no appear to have been proven to have all been lies). Blair probably helped Hutton write his report....

get real


Fuck Hutton

28.01.2004 21:06

Perhaps the arrangement Hutton was placed him only gave him enough access to information to write what he did, but the end result was so one-sided he obviously lacked any moral scrupples. Perhaps Hutton isnt as big a liar as Blair who still claims the prewar intellegence was valid despite overwhelming evidence that it was all lies, but Hutton also deserves a special place in hell for this horrible report.

Throw the Bastards Our


Whither the BBC?

28.01.2004 21:29

I agree with Get Real. Although...

Even if we don't have freedom of the mainstream press, further attacks on it should be resisted? YES/NO


The BBC is an arm of the British state. I sat in the road outside M/C BBC protesting its pro-war bias with thousands of you 9 months ago. Is it worth defending against the evil Murdoch? YES/NO



A truthful inquiry would see Blair,Straw, Hoon in prison YES/YES




PS Nice photoshops folks. Props to the artists

manu chao's lovechild


Who Hutton Report Online and Its Not Much More Than a Pile Of Poodle Shit

28.01.2004 21:36

 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/uk/2003/david_kelly_inquiry/inquiry_documents/default.stm

How do you reconcile the following Mr Spock:

U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell has conceded that deposed President Saddam Hussein's regime might not have possessed any banned weapons at the time the U.S.-led coalition launched its war in Iraq last year. Powell's remarks come after David Kay, the retiring chief U.S. weapons inspector in Iraq, said he thinks Iraq probably got rid of its chemical and biological weapons after the first Gulf War.
 http://www.rferl.org/features/features_article.aspx?id=6ee43ebd-119e-427f-9a96-7e6dac6e694c&y=2004&m=01

and

"If you ask me what I believe, I believe the intelligence was correct, and I think in the end we will have an explanation" - Tony Blair Jan 25 2004
 http://www.itv.com/news/2056255.html

Not only did Blair lie before the wayr but he assumes he is so good at manipulating public opinion that he can stick by his claims even when its becoming more and more obvious that they were lies. Bush and Cheney are even starting to have to scapegoat bad intelligence but Blair is such a bastard he wont even do that.

Hutton Report = Poodle Shit


Clever

29.01.2004 00:25

I see the point on the board that, given the boundaries Lord Hutton set himself, it was a fair report. I think it was, and that's what's so clever about it. Ignoring completely the fact that there are no weapons of mass destruction, and the intelligence was obviously dodgy, the government did nothing wrong in presenting to the public completely fabricated evidence.
As soon as he uttered almost the first sentence, 'I am going to ignore the continiung controversy over the intelligence about the WMD', I could tell the government were going to be in the clear. And that is what is so clever, because of course the government aren't going to be stupid enough to order an inquiry into why they went to war. Given the boundaries Lord Hutton set himself, this report was never going to validate or invalidate those reasons, it's just been played in the media that this is what is was all about.

Tell me, why are there no weapons of mass destruction when the intelligence services said there were? That would be a real inquiry. This was just a distraction. rather irrelevant flak to distract the media from the real question, and sadly it worked.

Never mind, eh? Better Blair than Howard. But they'll get whats coming to them, inshallah.

Hermes


Any "Eyewitnesses"?

29.01.2004 14:35

I live in Canada, but my parents live in Luton.

My Father says that England is the most surveilled nation on the planet. (He told me this as two new cameras went up near his house - one which can see into his living room, the other, my sister and brother's room) Does anyone know if there were any surveillance systems in the vicinity of Dr. Kelly's death?

I know it seems like an obvious "no", but with this lot, you just never know. I mean, they've never shown us the airport surveillance showing "ze terrorists" boarding the planes on September 11th ...

Jordan Thornton
mail e-mail: dissident420@hotmail.com


Hutton irrelevant

29.01.2004 16:25

Reasons given for war: WMD, democracy in Iraq.

One year on, still no WMD, still no democracy in Iraq!

 http://www.stopwar.org.uk

kurious