The increasingly nazi-like ( in my opinion) Daily Express is still supporting him. Todays paper also included condemnation of Mayday 2001 (!), more hardcore 'anarchist thugs', and a condemnation of a young lad who protected himself against police assault and was cleared by judge and jury! (Perhaps he should sue the mail as it seems to me that there comments are libellous)
These views are just the tip of the iceberg for the shit thaty is coming out of Porno Desmond's Express and Kilroy's particulalrly long and hateful career.
The Express target readership appears to be the lower middle class /working class aspirant bigot.

Good news.

He deserves everything he gets.

I don't pay taxes to support scumbag racists like Kilroy at the BBC.

Now it is safe to quit my job, become unemployed and start watching daytime TV again.

Headline of the Day # 1 (good news) ... Kilroy writes the sort of racist article usually the preserve of Judo-Nazis (zionist scum, not the real Jews such as those at  http://www.jewsNOTzionists.org) and gets his arse kicked for having the IQ of a dog and using the language of a "trailer trash" BNP moron...

Headline of the Day # 2 (bad news) ... Hamas leadership will be murdered over next few weeks, promise "israeli" (anti-Jewish) zionists in "targetted" killings with illegal weapons that as usual will kill innocent bystanders including children. See  http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,1089989,00.html - "Israel admits it lied over missile raid on camp"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXTRACT FROM THE ABOVE SOURCE:

"The Israeli military has admitted that it lied about a rocket attack on a Gaza refugee camp, which according to the army led to no casualties, but which the Palestinians have claimed killed 14 civilians.
A leftwing member of the Israeli parliament, Yossi Sarid, forced the confession from the air force chief after he threatened to release evidence that the military had used a weapon more destructive and indiscriminate than it had publicly claimed.

A month ago, the air force launched an assassination strike against a Hamas activist who was driving through Nuseirat refugee camp. The Palestinians claimed that the attack caused a large number of civilian casualties, but the air force commander, Major General Dan Halutz, produced video footage of the car being hit by two missiles that showed no one standing near the wrecked vehicle as the rockets struck.

The military said that Hellfire missiles were used, producing a concentrated explosion over a small area. Gen Halutz likened the effect of the missiles to "two grenades". The video footage was widely shown on Israeli television.

But the army now admits that it lied in briefings to the Israeli and foreign press, because the second rocket was not a Hellfire missile.

The military refuses to identify the weapon used, on the grounds of "operational security". But the speculation is that it was an American-made Flechette, which is illegal under international law because it fires thousands of tiny darts over hundreds of metres, causing horrific injuries. Israel has used similar weapons in Gaza in the past."



-------------------------------------------------------------------------







End the zionist occupation if you want peace or die like the dogs you are, defending stolen Palestinian land. If you dare to report what the godless zionists who have abandoned Judaism and embraced Nazism are doing to the Palestinians on their own land you will be murdered too, like Tom Hurndall, James Miller and Rachel Corrie (and the countless innocent Palestinians slaughtered by the occupiers).

I dont care for Mr Silk, or his views, but I dont think this is good news. If U believe in free speech, U must accept that opinions you dont agree with, or even find offensive, have a right to be expressed. (And we ought not pretend we are something we are not). I'd have expected that to go without saying as you're posting on a site who's reason to be is free speech. If U can control your over-emotional natures for a moment and compare the sentiments, U will surely accept that Tom Paulin's remarks on Newsnight Review were equally offensive. Advocating the EXECUTION of misguided settlers vs. sweeping statements of uneducated racial stereotyping. I suspect that there have been many other insensitive, or downright offensive incidents in the past that have not met with suspension. (Jim Davidson?)
Why should Paulin not have been banned first? Because hatred in a "highbrow" form is more valid than a populist one? No. The real reason is that nobody watches, or gives a damn about Newsnight Review & Paulin is not in the mainstream. But the BBC is very wary of damaging its reputation in broader society. The above posts show this. They dont clamour for Paulin (probably agree with him), just the celebrity figure. It shows what slaves to the press agenda they actually are.
Kilroy-Silk was unlucky, in the sense that he is one amongst many "controversial" columnists who got pulled up on his simple-minded stirring. This is because he is more high profile due to his TV show. Anyone who reads the Sun, Mirror, Express, Mail, and to a lesser extent Guardian & Telegraph read tons of such shit, in one form or another, every day. The opinions HERE that generate most responses tend to be the strident, opinionated ones. Its what print journalism is about. Thats what sells news. BUT ITS "THE PEOPLE" WHO BUY IT & WANT TO BE OUTRAGED.
I think the BBC is hypocritical, but clearly a massive corporation taking a business decision. Kilroy has been publicly disgraced already. That is enough. Dont EVER be fooled into jumping on the censorship bandwagon.

The difference between Kilroy and Paulin, was that Kilroy seems to dislike people on the basis of who they are (Arabs), whereas Paulin is offended by what they do (settling in Palestine).

Not that I agree with Paulin saying that settlers should be shot.

I await the new Beeb show : 'What the Arabs did for us'.

Presented by Salman Rushdie ???

Pity the late Edward Said couldn't.


As for freedom of speech, Kilroy and the rest,were 'economical with the truth' as usual
forgetting just who it was set up and propped up the very regimes he was accusing.
Yes,there are aspects of islam that are appalling,but then so has christianity.
(American evangelists for instance and the historical crusades and inquisitions)

Anyway, y'all know this stuff.