Copyright 2004-2054 The Seer of Forbidden Truth, All Rights Reserved. None of the content of this essay may be reproduced or redistributed by anyone without the expressed and written consent of The Seer of Forbidden Truth. Violators will be prosecuted.

The Toxic, Deranged, Societal Institution of Marriage:

Some of you might be wondering whether the rather "ordinary", commonplace, ritual of marriage, so popular and cherished within your insane, diseased cultural framework, deserves to have an entire essay devoted to it. The answer to this question is absolutely Yes. In this toxic ritual, which your society has sanctified and given the name of marriage, we have an extraordinary, multi-tiered melding of numerous societal and cultural derangements, and in combination they serve to literally astound the sane thinker, in the degree and depth of derangement that this ritual embodies. It is both my pleasure and my obligation, as your Seer of Forbidden Truth, to tear asunder this insane and overtly malevolent societal ritual, lay it bare, and expose it's oozing toxicity for all the world, or at least you few Superior readers, to behold. Let us begin with a generally accepted dictionary definition of marriage: The state in which a man and a woman are formally united for the purpose of living together (usually in order to procreate children) and with certain legal rights and obligations toward each other. That is the basic, first level, most generally accepted dictionary definition of the societal ritual known as "marriage". This definition has not an iota of genuinely valid Truth to it. It is farcical and ridiculously pretentious, not to mention deliberately misleading. Very specifically, it reveals not an iota of the horrific consequences that "getting married" carries with it. The accurate, Forbidden Truth definition of marriage is as follows: A completely unnatural, totally irrational activity, terroristically coerced and compelled by society, in which two people agree to legally enslave themselves to each other, for the purpose of creating a toxic, artificial, totally bizarre and irrational, not to mention unnatural enmeshment, that is designed to retain a brutal, terroristic, unbreakable grip upon both parties, until one party dies. The enslavement carries with it the power of judicial law, thus allowing either of the two parties to literally and legally make life a living hell for the person that they are married to, using societal law, and therefore society itself, to inflict unique, slave-based torment and suffering, upon their spouse. Yes, my definition is kind of lengthy, but every word used in this definition, this revelation of the True meaning of marriage, is 100% vital and necessary, in order to convey, in an intellectually honest and valid manner, the factual meaning of and consequences of, getting or being married.

Marriage is a toxic, unnatural ritual, devised by societal leaders, to terroristically compel citizen-slaves, both male and female, into agreeing to enslave themselves to each other. What do I mean by "enslave"? I mean, in the truest sense of the term, to "become a slave to the other person". This toxic ritual is designed to order two people, a man and a woman, to live together, have sex with each other, create children together, and live in a toxically enmeshed manner, from the moment that they get married, until the moment that one of the two people dies. This "order" is remarkable in scope. It carries with it horrific legal dangers, threats, and weapons, as well as the terroristic doctrine that the omnipotent god creature not only wants people to get married, but then proceeds to somehow "watch" the married couple, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, ready to punish the parties in some fashion, should they dare to defy the insanely fascist doctrines, such as not having sexual contact with anyone but your spouse, that are attached to this insane ritual known as marriage. Astonishingly, a woman who creates a child when married, has an overt legal obligation, as well as overt cultural terrorization, imposed upon her, decreeing that she must assume possession of, responsibility for, and proceed to "raise" the child. A man who creates a child while married, has all of these same fascist "obligations" placed upon him by society, in addition to the even more outrageous decree that he has a financial obligation to provide enough funds to pay for the feeding, clothing, and raising of the child, until the child reaches 18 or 21 years of ago. The amount of money that is involved in this two decade process, easily exceeds two hundred thousand in most cases, and often reaches closer to a million dollars. Yes, I understand that these fascist obligations are also imposed upon non-married human beings who create children, but I want to focus right now on how the toxic ritual of marriage creates a specter of legitimacy to this type of Sacred Family Unit mythology, as terroristically imposed upon you creatures by your societies.

The appeal that this toxic, unnatural, and noxious ritual holds, also revolves around the obsession that you creatures have with owning slaves. The marriage ritual terroristically entraps and enslaves two people to each other, which is a primary societal goal, but in addition, and just as importantly, it allows, legitimizes, and encourages enraged, slave-seeking individuals to find a human that they wish to possess as a slave, to be able to control and dictate their daily life activities, and to obtain this perverse, fascist, terroristic control, simply by convincing the other individual, through deceit and manipulation of course, to agree to marry them. Once married, both individuals are perversely entrapped to each other, but depending upon the degree of insanity, terror, and rage that afflicts each half of the toxically enslaved couple, one of the two individuals may and usually does inflict far greater "domination" over the daily life activities and life path of the other individual. This is because the marriage ritual is designed to function along similar lines to the child-slave ownership ritual. Married couples are primarily encouraged and in fact culturally terrorized by their society, into agreeing to breed, to have children and to then use those children as subhuman Poison Containers. But at the same time, married couples are also encouraged to use each other as Poison Containers, with the more societally victimized and traumatized half of the couple given cultural as well as to a degree legal authorization, to abuse, harm, impose his will upon, and treat the person they are married to, as a subhumanized slave.

Societies bestow a ridiculous aura of mysticism, sacredness, and legitimacy upon the toxic ritual of marriage, as a way of legitimizing Sacred Family Unit mythology as a whole. You, as citizen-slaves, are terroristically brainwashed into embracing the notions that it is very important that you get married, very important that you create a "family" for yourself, and that you assume the "responsibilities" that come with getting married and creating a family. The bribes that are used by society to achieve this malevolent goal, are incredibly diverse and deviously clever. You are told that all "normal" people get married. You are told that the day you get married will be "the happiest day of your life". You are told that your relatives and other "loved ones", expect and want you to get married, and that you would be disappointing them if you fail to do so. You are told that the omnipotent god creature that you have been brainwashed into believing exists, wants you to get married. You are told that you will be given specific financial benefits by your society, that non-married people do not enjoy. You are told that once you are married, you will have another person at your disposal, to engage in sexual contact with, as often and whenever you wish to enjoy sexual pleasure or climax. You are told that if you feel "romantic love" towards another person, the best way to maintain this love is to marry the person, even though romantic love does not even exist as a reality within human consciousness. All of these malevolent, untrue, overtly manipulative bribes and lies are issued by society, for the specific purpose of getting you citizen slaves to agree to get married, to agree to commit an atrocity upon yourself. What is the atrocity? It is slavery. Every person who gets married is committing a very specific action: They are robbing themselves of their most basic person freedoms, and for no valid reason, enslaving themselves not only to a fellow human being, but to society as a whole. Understand this: The legal ramifications and consequences of being married go far beyond merely being enslaved to a fellow human being. When you are married, you are under the terroristic, fascist control of society itself, to a significantly higher degree than is the case if you are not married. When you choose to get married, you assume and accept financial liability and responsibility towards other human beings, for as long as you or your wife/children live, and in fact even beyond your own death, as evidenced by the fact that many societies have laws which dictate that if you die, some or all of your assets will be given to your spouse and children, even if you do not want them to receive your assets. Far more importantly, throughout your entire lifetime, when freedom and money do have direct value and importance to you, you face an absolutely horrific burden, a legal burden, that society imposes upon you with regard to "sharing" your life, money, sex, abode, etc..., with the specific person that you are married to, and any children that you might create.

Now, it is very important to understand that the financial liability that is terroristically imposed via this ritual, while very important and absolutely brutal in it's injustice, is only a small part of what makes marriage such an abomination. The insane moral decrees that the god creature is involved in sanctifying this toxic ritual, and the cultural doctrine which is used to convince people to get married, are just as outrageous in their malevolent consequences. The ability to achieve pleasure and happiness in life, genuine pleasure and happiness free of toxic societal ideology, is the single most valid "freedom" that exists within the cosmic perception of reality, of each individual. There is no other single societal ritual that compromises and robs more people of the ability to achieve happiness and pleasure in their lives, than the toxic and insane ritual of marriage. The freedom to befriend, form a relationship with, and have sexual contact with whomever one wishes, whenever one wishes, as well as the freedom to always be able to decline to have sex with someone, is incredibly valuable and irreplaceable, insofar as achieving happiness and contentment in life. The instant that a person gets married, this precious, unique, irreplaceable freedom is completely lost. Not only does the married person become horrifically obligated to have sexual contact only with their spouse, but they also lose the ability to decline to have sex with their spouse, since the insane doctrine of marriage decrees that each party has a culturally imposed obligation to try and satisfy the sexual desires of their spouse. How else can we accurately define "freedom"? Well, what about the ability to live where and with whom one wants?? Sounds like a pretty basic, fundamental freedom, but the second you get married, you are completely stripped of this freedom! You are terroristically compelled by the doctrine of your society, to live with the specific human being that you are married to. You are further robbed of your ability to move away, to relocate to another area, since you are decreed to have an obligation to remain together with your spouse, to live wherever your spouse chooses to live. But the theft of physical freedom goes much, much deeper, once a child is created. The married couple then become "parents", with an utterly fascist decree imposed, that the parents assume an obligation to raise and care for "their" child, for the next 18-21 years. Each and every day, instead of being free to do as she pleases, the mother, and usually only to a slightly lesser degree the father, has a terroristic obligation placed upon her, to reject all of her own desired life activities and pursuits, and instead spend 6+ hours, each and every day, serving the needs of the child, even if she hates the child! Only one out of 500,000 married couples, at most, will refuse to assume custody of a child they create. This is because they feel and they are, terrorized. They have each been convinced by society that they must not tell their mate that they hate their child. They must never even suggest that their mate consider refusing to accept custody of, or affirmatively rejecting custody of, the child. They believe that it is their obligation to sacrifice their own freedom, happiness, autonomy, not only to each other, but to their biological creations as well, even if they hate their biological creations! Absolutely amazing! The wife hates the child, doesn't want it, but she can't tell her hubby that, it would be scandalous! It would violate a lifetime of toxic societal Sacred Family Unit brainwashing. Or the hubby hates the child, same thing, can never tell his wife that, can never even consider requesting that they consider refusing to serve as parents. In many cases both the hubby and wife hate the child, or at the very least have no genuinely affirmative desire to raise the child. But they can never even consider telling each other the Truth, about how they feel, because each is in mortal terror of being judged as "abnormal, immoral", etc..., by their mate and by the society that they are slaves to.

Do we have a freedom that is even more precious than these?? Yes! Financial freedom. Most especially in capitalistic societies, but in reality true within all societies, every human being literally has their own fate, in their own financial hands. Run out of money, and you will be forced to live a physically and emotionally difficult, stressful, existence, with no home, no privacy, no proper medical care, and inferior, unhealthy food, at best. Having money is the very root of physical freedom. And yet again we have the toxic ritual of marriage, literally able to be used as a tool of financial torture, within which people who have gotten married have literally hundreds of thousands of their own, legally earned/possessed assets, forcibly taken away from them by the legal system, for being guilty of the "crime" of having consensual sexual contact with someone other than their spouse, or trying to leave their marriage, a toxic, unnatural ritual that they only entered into due to overtly evil societal coercion, brainwashing, and terrorization. Lets consider a rather conservative scenario: A married man is robbed of $200,000, over the course of 18 years, in supporting a child that he has created, that he never even felt the tiniest bit of true affection for. If this man had invested this amount of money in stocks, regularly, each month putting in the same amount of money that he ended up giving away to the child, he would likely have well over one million dollars in cash, in his stock portfolio, after the 18 years are up. Most men father children by age 25. So, by age 43, after 18 years, this man would be a millionaire, he would be 43 years old, have a million dollars in cash, be able to quit his job and retire, if only he had not been terroristically compelled by society to give away his own, legally earned and possessed $200,000 to a child that he never even liked, just because he either created the child, or even if he merely married someone who already had a child that she created by having sex with some other man. All forms of societally mandated "child support", including providing financial support for children while still married to and living with the spouse, as well as all forms of "alimony", constitute absolutely nothing less than legal robbery. They involve a person, usually a man, having his own money taken away from him against his will, for doing nothing wrong. Money that is being legally earned and is legally possessed. The only thing that the person did "wrong", was that he allowed his evil society to either terroristically coerce him to get married, or to convince him to create a child, or to cause him to have an inferior, but still perfectly legal and natural form of sexual contact that resulted in a child being created, despite the fact that he had no desire to create a child. It is beyond belief, to any sane thinker, that you creatures would allow yourselves and your fellow human beings to literally be robbed of a million dollars, by society, for doing any of these three "wrong" things. Much less applaud and sanctify such insane laws. The fact that society is directly responsible for causing all three of these things to occur, via it's judicial/legal system, only adds to the unbelievable nature of this injustice.

Now, I want to make a couple of things clear. First of all, I will be discussing personal freedom at a separate essay, and none of my above comments regarding specific freedoms that marriage severely compromises, are meant to imply that these freedoms are truly enjoyed, to a profound and genuine degree, by non-married people, or by any people who live as members of a human society. The fact is, societies do not provide genuine personal freedoms to any of their citizen-slaves. At the same time however, the lack of genuine freedom that is experienced by all, that is unjustly imposed by society upon all citizens, is still significantly greater and more brutal, if you are married. Secondly, and more to the point here, none of the Truths that I am revealing here with regard to the toxic ritual of marriage, necessarily extend to voluntary sexual coupling as a lifestyle choice. In other words, a private, non-legal, non-coerced, personal decision that is made by two individuals, to only have sexual contact with each other, nobody else, while absolutely an extreme and in most cases unnatural lifestyle choice, does not carry with it most of the horrific consequences that engaging in the specific activity of becoming legally married, carries. It is the legally binding nature of the toxic ritual of marriage, that carries immense and extremely negative consequences, very specific legal and culturally terroristic consequences that society is eager to impose upon as many of it's citizen-slaves as it possibly can. This is why societies overtly criticize "live-in lover" relationships, and use all the legal and cultural coercion and bribery at their disposal, to try and convince "lovers" of all types, including live-in lovers, to agree to legally enslave themselves to each other, and to society itself, by legally getting married. This point cannot be emphasized enough: When a person gets married they enslave themselves to society, they forfeit their personal freedoms and human rights to society, just as strongly and horrifically, as they enslave themselves to each other. This is why marriage has so much value to society, why it is possibly the single most desperately promoted cultural ritual within society. It is because the person getting married forfeits their freedom, not merely to the specific person they are marrying, but to an even greater degree, to the society within which they live as citizens.

There are literally 1000 different methods with which this toxic ritual is terroristically imposed upon you citizen-slaves. I do not have space to list all 1000, so you'll have to settle for just one: Picture the scenario: A man grows to like a woman. She has created a child with another man, who is no longer in her life. The man starts having sex with the woman, and moves into the household. He grows to feel affection towards the child as well. Both of these adults are told by society that unless they get married, the man will have no legal authority to protect or care for the child, should the child's mother die or become incapacitated. In addition, should his sexual partner, the mother of the child, decide that she doesn't want to have sex with him anymore, the only avenue by which the man can try to preserve his ability to retain access to the child that he has grown to care about, is to be married to the woman, and thus carry the societal title of "stepfather". Here you have a simple, clear, undeniable example of how terroristic societal coercion works. The man is emotionally terrorized, under threat to a child's welfare, into agreeing to get married. And this is just one of thousands of different types of terroristic coercion, emotional, legal, financial, cultural, familial, etc..., that are all brought to bear by society upon all individuals, as part of a systematic campaign designed to get as many citizen-slaves as possible into embracing this toxic ritual.

The absolute root of Sacred Family Unit mythology, is woven around the toxic ritual of marriage. Little girls aged four, are already obsessed with getting married. They play "bride and groom" with dolls, they imagine being married, even though they have no intellectual awareness of what marriage even is, what the word means, much less the consequences of marriage. This is because the daily brainwashing that societies engage in, promoting and idolizing this ritual, is immense. No child can escape it. Marriage is promoted to girls as being the only genuinely safe life path to take. Once you have snared a man, you are safe. You can fulfill your societal obligations to breed, raise children, serve a man, while gaining the monetary benefits of having a "supporter". Understand this: Nothing that has occurred within the so-called "feminist" movements that some societies have experienced in recent decades/centuries, has touched these Truths. Nor do feminists have any desire to challenge this Sacred societal doctrine, since they understand that only a tiny handful of women, perhaps one in 50,000, has the intellectual/emotional autonomy, ability or the desire to reject the societally decreed legitimacy and validity of these brainwashings. This is true even for women who choose not to get married. Have feminists called for an end to alimony laws, or an end to child support laws? No, of course not! This is because they understand that women, even women who choose not to get married, want to retain the legal right, for themselves and for other women, to pounce upon this societally provided "safe" life path, if and when they choose to do so, and obtain a "male slave" for themselves. Marriage is designed so that it has multiple, layered enticements, so as to lure in a maximum number of citizen-slaves. What do I mean by multiple, tiered enticements? Consider the enticements provided to women: First of all, your husband will "love" you, and is obligated to always love you, under insane marriage doctrine. What an incredible enticement this is, most especially since most women hate themselves and are desperately trying to make themselves feel loved by other human beings. But wait, what if your husband starts to hate you after awhile?? That's bad, isn't it?? That's a good reason not to get married, you don't want to be enslaved to a person who has grown to hate you, do you?? Guess what, society has deliberately structured marriage so that this situation is made to not appear at all bad! Because multiple enticements are provided, within the legal framework of the toxic ritual. If your husband starts to hate you, you simply get rid of him, while at the same time hurting him and getting vengeance against him for daring to have stopped loving you, by legally robbing him of his financial assets/earnings, via alimony/child support! You see, marriage is marketed as a "win-win" situation, using multiple, tiered layers of societal brainwashing, lies, and bribes, which are literally sewn into the legal framework of this toxic ritual. Even women who hate sex, who hate men, are given "good" reasons to get married, such as one of the easiest ways to obtain a genuine financial windfall, by society!

Somewhat different enticements are used to coerce men into agreeing to get married, but even though the specific enticements that are employed are different in their detail, they are designed to achieve the exact same societally malevolent goal, and they are just as irrational, just as coercive, just as manipulatively invalid. The sexual slave angle is played up more by society, for men. "If you agree to get married, you will have a woman as your sexual slave, every single day and night, for as long as she lives, she will be obligated to serve your sexual desires/needs" That is a prime enticement given to males. And it works beautifully, since as I have already outlined in my Sex essay, men are terroristically coerced by society into believing that they need to have intimate sexual contact with a fellow human being, in order to be "normal", and not to satisfy their own sexual needs on their own, via masturbation. Men are also brainwashed into believing that it is important to have "heirs", important to be able to have blood descendants to leave their money too, the money that they have wasted their entire lives working as slaves, to earn. The notion that there is any value, benefit, or importance in leaving money to a spouse or child(ren) when you die, is of course ludicrous. But you have to be sane to recognize this, and none of you creatures possess the ability to think sanely, so again, this ridiculous, manipulative lie works very well. Men are convinced that getting married is the right thing to do, because you can acquire a "valuable asset", a family, and then spend your life trying to acquire another valuable asset, money, to give to your other valuable asset, your family. Ha! What a joke, it's hard for me to believe that you creatures can be this dumb, this insane. It's not bad enough that you are terroristically coerced by society into agreeing to work as a slave to financially support yourself. You happily go much further, accepting the deranged societal doctrine that it is a good, worthwhile thing for you to assume the financial obligation/burden to work as a slave for the purpose of supporting others, a spouse and children, along with yourself! You actually choose to assume this incredible burden, believing that there are genuine, legitimate benefits in having the "valuable assets" of a wife and child, even though the advantages that these assets bring are completely illegitimate, an artificial construct of an insane societal ideology.

Of course we have many other types of enticements that appeal quite equally, to both men and women. Society decrees that "normal" people get married, brainwashed citizen-slaves of both genders desperately want to be labeled as being "normal" by their society. There are financial enticements as well, which appeal to men just as much as to women. Many societies have created a taxation system that very specifically rewards married couples with lower tax rates and the like. Creating children, especially within a married couple, is a way to acquire financial aid/benefits from the government. The economies of most societies are specifically designed in such a way that a single person will likely have financial hardship in purchasing a nice house in a nice neighborhood. The cost of housing is specifically manipulated by societal leaders in such a way as to require income from at least two different people, as a way of coercing people into living together, and getting married. Even the postal and package delivery system is structured so that a single person living alone will suffer significant inconvenience in getting items delivered to his home, unless he is living with someone else, unless he has a "family" living with him, because most people work outside of the home, during daytime hours, when regular deliveries of packages are made. Again, I could list a thousand or more different, deliberate enticements that societies use, to get you pathetic life forms to agree to get married to each other.

Getting married is an intellectually deranged lifestyle choice. This is the only term that accurately fits, intellectual derangement. And it applies in all cases, in all situations. Marriage is never, and can never be, a sane, rational, lifestyle choice, for anyone. This is because the ritual itself is based upon insane, artificial, untrue, invalid and nonsensical foundational premises. This is not to say that some people do not derive "personal benefits and happiness" from being married. Some do! But only because they have embraced and choose to wallow in, the toxic, invalid, illegitimate doctrines that accompany this toxic ritual. Marriage itself is an unnatural ritual, based upon invalid doctrine. Whatever perceived benefits it may provide to some individuals, arise from the embrace of the toxic, invalid ideologies that accompany the ritual, and that are offered as enticements by society to those agreeing to embrace this ritual, rather than from the legitimacy of the ritual itself. Of course many people hate possessing personal freedom and autonomy. The only way they can feel safe and comfortable, is to have their life toxically enmeshed within the life of another person. Marriage will appeal to such Inferiors, of course. Many other human torture victims of society like to suffer, they feel they deserve to suffer, to feel deprived, so being forced by society to spend their lives enslaved to one specific fellow human, their spouse, is just fine and dandy with them. Societies and religions encourage self-hatred and an embrace of suffering, so make no mistake, many of you creatures "enjoy" being married, this toxic ritual meets your perverse, societally induced life goals, such as to suffer. The sane, Superior human recognizes marriage for what it is, and shuns it like the bubonic plague should be shunned. It is a giant sinkhole upon the societal landscape, and society is desperately trying to push all of you into the sinkhole.

Once you are in, there is really only one escape. Guess what that escape is?? Come on, guess! The traditional "marriage vows" tell you what your only escape is. Come on, five letter word, starts with the letter D. No, not divorce, you idiots. The word we are looking for is Death. Yes, death. Death is the only way to escape from the horrific sinkhole of marriage. "Till death do us part", says the marriage vow. Only way to escape, as officially decreed by society, is to die yourself, or to have your spouse die. So is it any wonder that next to legal owners murdering their child/slaves, spouses killing their mates is the second most popular and common form of murder? It's the only way out! Society officially decrees it, within it's insanely designed traditional marriage vows! The only way to interpret the traditional marriage vow, is: You gotta stay enslaved to this other human being that you got married to, until either this specific human dies, or until you die. The only acceptable escape from the marriage, from your slavery, is via death!

This seems like a good place to say a few words on divorce. Only in recent centuries, have some societies decided to offer an alternative to death, for escaping the toxic plague of marriage. This alternative has been designated as "divorce", and society claims that divorce "allows/causes a marriage to end." Is this true?? No! Not at all. Once again, as usual, we have an utter lie, a deliberate deception and definitional misapplication, malevolently applied by your diseased societies. All that divorce does, is alter the parameters of the existing marriage, in terms of loosening and changing some of the toxic enmeshment that exists between the married couple. Yes, they are allowed to refuse to have sex with each other, once divorced. And yes, in some cases they can even terminate all regular contact with each other. But, only in very rare cases, is the toxic enmeshment truly broken. In many cases the two people have created children, and both decide that they want to maintain contact with their children, and even to "share custody" of their children, thus the toxic enmeshment that existed within the marriage, absolutely remains. So how can you say that the divorce "ends" the marriage?? It does nothing of the kind! All it does is alter the degree of enmeshment that was created by the initial marriage. Then we have alimony, child support, etc... How can anything be ended, when the spouse is ordered by a court to give away his legal assets/earnings to one or two or three specific people that he is enmeshed with as a direct and sole result of having gotten married? In 99% of all divorces, the two people who used to be married remain obligated and compelled, under the terms of the divorce, to continue to have direct contact with each other, even if this only means giving away money to the other person. In most cases the contact is much more intense, the two people see each other at times, talk to each other, discuss their children, their lives, with each other. And even beyond this 99%, probably .8% of the remaining 1% voluntarily choose to maintain some type of contact with each other. So, 99.8 percent of all "divorced" people, continue to have both contact with and an impact upon the life of their former spouse, to one degree or another. Understand, in most cases this contact specifically occurs only because the two people "used" to be married to each other. Based upon these True facts, it is clear to any sane thinker that divorce cannot be properly defined as "the end of a marriage". Divorce does not end the contact, the enmeshment, that the two people were terroristically coerced by society into agreeing to embrace, when they got married. All that divorce does is alter the parameters of the marriage, loosens the chains of slavery between the two people, and allows the two people to go out and enslave themselves to other people via marriage. Amazingly, many people choose to get divorced only because they have decided that they want to be married to somebody else, not because they want to be free of this toxic, unnatural, brutally enslaving ritual that they have already been victimized by! Your blindness as creatures truly has no limitations! You actually blame your former marriage partner for the problems in the marriage, or you blame yourself, concluding that there was something wrong within the relationship, because you are so totally broken, brainwashed, and beholden to your society, that it never even occurs to you that the actual ritual of marriage itself, might be totally unnatural, illegitimate, deranged and toxic. So, even as you become more and more unhappy within your marriage, and start considering divorce, many of you are already looking to try and not only establish an intimate relationship with someone else, since you have been totally stripped of the ability to meet your own needs, but you are also looking forward to your next marrying event, to enslaving yourself to another human being and to society, in the exact same manner as you have already done, even as you are trying to escape and break away from your current or recent marriage. Amazing!

The option of getting divorced has been created and popularized in recent decades, in highly industrialized societies, as a way to encourage marriage. Societal leaders recognized that more and more citizens were at least vaguely beginning to realize that getting married offered no naturally valuable advantages to them, legitimate advantages, while at the same time carrying significant risks/drawbacks. The traditional marriage vows, "till death do you part", were scaring away some people from this precious and supremely valuable form of mass societal enslavement. So, the decision was made to allow people to slightly alter the exact text of their marriage vows, and to provide and legitimize the illusion of an "escape route" from marriage, and call it divorce. Inform the citizen-slaves that it is now possible to escape from the horrors of marriage, without you or your spouse having to die. And it worked! You creatures were so happy, so grateful, you felt so free, so "modern". "Now we can get married, as we are terroristically ordered to do by society, but it is great! Our society is glorious! We don't have to die any longer, neither do we have to kill or wait for our spouse to die, in order to escape from our marriages. We can instead get divorced! Oh thank you, dear society, for this marvelous new freedom. Now gimme that marriage license!" You know, when I think about how stupid, how utterly devoid of sanity you creatures are, I feel like vomiting. Truly, the bile rises up from my innards. To conclude, divorce is not an antidote to marriage, divorce does not undo the negative, sometimes horrific consequences and dangers that getting married usually brings. Divorce in no way "reverses" a marriage. The primary function that divorce serves, is to legitimize and increase the popularity of marriage within highly industrialized, extra-diseased societies. Divorce makes marriage seem less dangerous and terrible, not because it offers a genuine path of escape from a horrific marriage, but simply because it offers the illusion and the invalid perception that it can provide an escape. This is how your evil societies operate. When a tiny bit of Truth starts to leak out concerning an insane doctrine, ideology, or cultural movement that society is seeking to preserve and popularize, all that societal leaders have to do is "tweak" the insane doctrine, modify it a tiny bit, provide some sort of an illusion that a new, modern, "cutting edge" type of "reform" is being implemented, and you creatures, like lemmings, gleefully grab and embrace the wonderful new "freedom" and reform, totally unable to even begin to recognize that you have been played for the fools that you are.

The marriage ritual offers not a single legitimate, Truth-based benefit or improvement, to the life of any human being. All of the perceived benefits and advantages of marriage, are artificial constructs that society has deliberately and malevolently attached to this toxic ritual, in order to make it enticing. Your evil societies gain benefits and advantages from getting you creatures to agree to get married, and they achieve this goal by convincing you that marriage will provide benefits and advantages to you. But there is no rational legitimacy to these claims. The emotional, financial, and other types of "securities" that the marriage ritual offers, to both women and men, are not only terroristically compelled and imposed upon people as a malevolent enticement to get people to agree to get married, they are also completely unnatural, fascist, and they defy the most basic personal human freedoms and instincts. The freedom to not be legally enslaved to a fellow human. The freedom to be responsible for your own financial welfare, nobody else's. The freedom to evolve and to mature as a human being, throughout your lifetime, to be able to freely form whatever types of relationships you wish and possess the emotional capability of forming, at all times, throughout your lifetime, with no horrific, suffocating, lifelong chains being literally wrapped around your throat each day of your life, which is the literal, definitional reality of what being married constitutes. It doesn't matter whether you personally might have a "happy" marriage. It doesn't matter that you personally might not feel the suffocating chains around your neck. Make no mistake, if you are or ever were married, they are there. The fact that you may have no conscious awareness of how brutally enslaved you, as every married person, is, and the possibility that you might not feel victimized because you are in a "happy" marriage, has absolutely no bearing upon the Truths of what marriage is, and the horrific injustice that society perpetrates upon each and every individual, who is brainwashed and coerced into agreeing to engage in this toxic ritual.

This is a good place for me to offer a few comments on the importance of truly dissecting all societal issues and policies, when on a quest to uncover Truth. There are plenty of people who claim to be "social critics", who believe that they have the ability to recognize and "see through" some of the manipulations, lies, and brainwashings that their society imposes upon them, and subjects them to. But the reality is that almost none of these social critics even begin to scratch the surface, insofar as uncovering genuine, profound Truth, of the type that I, your Seer of Forbidden Truth, am revealing throughout this Manifesto. This is because most seekers of Truth are shallow thinkers. They manage to root out a single, minor, marginally hidden Truth, and ridiculously jump to the conclusion that they have uncovered the main or entire Truth of a societal ritual/issue, when in reality all that they have done is uncovered a single fact, a clue if you will, that does not even constitute an important Truth, but merely offers a gateway that can be used to tear down and unveil much deeper, more profound and important Forbidden Truths. The issue of marriage provides a perfect illustration of this pathetic state of affairs. Most people of course, have no Truth-based insight of any kind into the toxic, invalid, malevolent ritual of marriage. But there are a small number of so-called "philosophers" and "social critics", who manage to reach the factually valid insight that "marriage is designed by society to cause two people to have sexual contact only with each other, and to cause them to refrain from having sex with other human beings." Is this insight a true and valid insight? Yes. Would society prefer that it's citizen-slaves not be aware of this suppressed Truth? Yes. But at the same time, this insight does not constitute a top-level Forbidden Truth. All it provides is a basic starting point from which other, more genuinely important and profound Truths, can be derived, recognized, and embraced. The problem lies in the fact that the vast majority of the small group of philosophers and social critics, simply stop their analysis after they reach this initial, basic insight of Truth, believing that they have uncovered the "hidden secret" that society has refused to reveal to them, and having no ability or inclination to recognize the fact that all they have done is touched the very tip of a giant iceberg of profound Truth. This is why I am so proud of this Manifesto, and why I believe, sincerely, that this Manifesto is the single most important and valuable document to have ever been written by any human being, throughout the history of humanity.

The fact that society wants people to get married so that they will only have sex with a single person for the rest of their lives, is a very important, truthful realization. But it is only a surface scratch of Truth, regarding the Forbidden Truths of marriage. It is nothing more than the initial starting point, on an incredibly long and complex journey, for any human who truly wishes to understand and realize the much deeper, completely different, far more valuable Truths that are buried beneath this surface, superficial Truth. For example, the issue of why society desperately wants people to only have sex only with a single other person, is thousands of times more important, than simply arriving at the realization that society wants people to get married so that they only have sex with their spouse. The nature of how marriage is a form of brutal slavery, that actually enslaves participants more to society itself, than to each other, is incredibly profound. This is what constitutes Truth that carries extreme value, genuinely Forbidden Truths. The outline of how an individual inflicts brutal harm upon himself, lifelong harm, in literally a hundred or more different ways, by getting married, is precious and invaluable. Being able to understand the design structure and the actual, root motivations that society has, in imposing societal brainwashings that cause people to falsely perceive the toxic, genocidally harmful ritual of marriage as being a benevolent, desirable, necessary life path for them to embrace, this is Forbidden Truth. Truth that has value, Truth that is not shallow or superficial, but rather deep and profound. These are the Truths that your societies are truly desperate to keep hidden from you, and this is what makes them Forbidden Truths. Understand, if you merely recognize that your society wants you to get married so that you only have sexual contact with one person, you have not really uncovered anything of value. Unless you can take this Truth much further, analyzing, understanding, and accepting the reasons why society wants this, the lengths to which society will go to force you to get married, all of the horrific dangers and negative consequences that go along with being married, and all of the many other, more profound reasons for why society wants you to get married, above and beyond simply robbing you of your sexual freedom, you have not even come close to embracing a genuine Forbidden Truth.

It is not accurate to conclude that the primary reason that society wants you to get married, is to force you to limit your sexual activity to only one other person, your spouse. This is simply one reason, among hundreds of different reasons, and it is not the primary reason for why societies are so desperately eager to get you creatures to marry. Robbing individuals of their sexual freedom is an important goal of your malevolent societies, but it is simply one type of freedom, one type among dozens of different freedoms, that the marriage ritual has been specifically designed to rob all citizen-slaves of. The primary purpose that the marriage ritual is designed to serve, is to create a lifelong, unnatural, toxic enmeshment between two human beings, that creates a dependent, familial handcuff, in this case a mindcuff as well, which robs individuals of all of their most basic freedoms and autonomies. Emotional freedom, financial freedom, physical freedom, intellectual freedom, the freedom to love yourself, to recognize the Truth that your life is your life, that it belongs to you, nobody else. Marriage uses governmental force as well as ideological/cultural brainwashing, to terroristically compel genocidally harmful, fascist behaviors and lifestyles, among all citizen-slaves. The power of the government, via the legal and judicial system, is overtly, systematically, and universally employed within the marriage ritual, and this is what truly makes the ritual genocidally evil. If there was only cultural terrorization, such as a doctrine that god wants people to only have sex with one other person of the opposite gender, and that all "normal" people get married, without any legal authority being involved in or manifested from the ritual itself, it could be rationally argued that the degree of societal evil involved in the imposition of this ritual upon citizen-slaves, is under some degree of control and limitation. But the factual reality, of how every possible legal and judicial force of law is deliberately and specifically employed within the ritual of marriage, via the divorce ritual, alimony, child support, the taxation system, the signing of legally binding documents, the overt threat of imprisonment that both male and female spouses face, if they dare to try and defy the "laws" of marriage, etc.., proves that limitless evil on the part of society, is involved here. Societal leaders recognize that this ritual is toxic, it is unnatural, it defies human instinct, it is fascist, and the only way it can be made to remain popular within the general public, is via the utilization of both extreme and punitive cultural brainwashing/mythology, and extremely punitive legal/judicial threat and punishment.

Here is another example of the profound importance of digging through all Truths until you reach the very core, most important and deeply suppressed/hidden Forbidden Truths: Let us consider the fact that the insane marriage ritual decrees that the female who marries the male, must agree to abandon and renounce her own surname, and assume her husband's surname as her own. Until just a few decades ago, this was a universally imposed mandate of the marriage ritual. And even today, all women are strongly encouraged by society to either adopt the surname of the man they are marrying outright, or at the very least, begin to include his surname, in hyphenated form, together with her own surname. The Superior seeker of Forbidden Truth, in trying to figure out the purpose behind this perverse societal decree, may fairly easily and quickly arrive at the realization that this is a form of societal subjugation of the female, instructing her that she is higher-ranking than any of the child-slaves she is expected to create within the Sacred Family Unit, but lower-ranking than her husband, obligated to serve and obey her husband's orders, demands, and desires. She is beneath her husband, inferior to her husband. Her identity and value as an individual human being is stripped away from her by virtue of her choosing to get married, and this is made perfectly clear to both her and her husband, by the nature of this perverse surname decree. She loses her own surname, just as she loses her freedom, her autonomy, her independence, her personal identity and individual value as a human being. The insane marriage ritual brutally strips all of it's female participants of these sacred and precious human rights/freedoms, while at the same time the males are brutally stripped of their own precious human freedoms and rights, in slightly different ways.

Now, what I have just revealed above regarding how and why society strips it's females who agree to get married of their surnames, is an absolutely valid and extremely important Forbidden Truth. And yet if the seeker of Forbidden Truth arrives at this insight and then simply stops, assuming they have figured out the most important Truth that this surname decree reveals, they will have failed to recognize the ultimate of Truths. Which is this: The marriage ritual is unworkable and unsustainable if it is based upon equality, benevolence, morality, or Truth. It is fundamentally deranged, doomed to failure in all circumstances, unless it is artificially and invalidly propped up by society. Declaring the female to be subjugated to the male, within the marriage ritual, is a way to invalidly prop up the marriage ritual, because more men seek to subjugate women, than women seek to subjugate men, and more women than men are submissive masochists who want to be treated as being inferior on a daily basis, within their day to day lives. So, even if you understand the fact that this surname insanity is intended to subjugate the female, and have embraced this very valid and important Truth, you still have not reached the absolute core Forbidden Truth of the situation, the primary reason for why your societies choose to decree women to be inferior and enslaved to men within the marriage ritual. And the reason is, because doing so helps to entice and encourage both men and women into agreeing to participate in this insane ritual. It provides a perverse and malevolent prop, based upon slaveowner-slave and dominant-submissive doctrine, which instructs all citizens who want to be slaveowners, as well as all citizens who want to be slaves, as well as all citizens who want to dominate a fellow human being, as well as all citizens who want to be dominated by another human being, that if they agree to participate in the marriage ritual, their emotional and psychological needs with regard to all four of these cravings, can and will be met. This is the "core" Forbidden Truth, the most important and deeply hidden Truth, although of course there is always value and importance in recognizing and embracing all Forbidden Truth. All I'm saying is that as a Superior seeker of Truth, you must learn to dig deep, and understand that just because you might manage to figure out some profound Truth regarding a specific issue/situation, does not necessarily mean that you have uncovered or realized the most important, profound, or core-level Truth that the issue/situation actually does reveal.

To expand upon a point I made earlier, there is nothing intrinsically unnatural or perverse about a human being, male or female, deciding to have sexual contact with only a single other human being, for a length of time. Even if the person states that he intends to never have sex with any other human being for as long as he lives, this is perfectly fine. Even this does not necessarily indicate that the person is mentally ill, although it does strongly suggest that the person is thinking irrationally. The horror and the incredible perversion lies in the fact of society having the audacity to create an artificial, invalid ritual, naming it "marriage", and instructing all citizens that there are exterior forces at work, the god creature, definitions of normalcy, desires of relatives, financial benefits, etc..., which require them to legally enslave themselves to each other once they decide to only have sex with each other, and for this myth to then be turned into a legal contract that is used as a brutally terroristic tool of fascism, to literally torture the married individuals into being and remaining enslaved and toxically enmeshed to and beholden to, each other and even more so, to society. Marriage has been designed as a toxic, enslaving ritual, precisely because it is completely unnatural for the vast majority of human beings to have sexual contact with only one other human being, for any extended length of time. If marriage did not exist as a legal ritual, some people would still tell other people that they only want to have sex with them, and some people would still restrict their sexual contact to only one other person, for short periods of time. In some cases a few weeks, in some cases a few months, in some cases a few years. But almost never for a "lifetime", because it is completely unnatural for all but a handful of people, to restrict their sexual activity/contact to only a single fellow human being. Therefore, all that marriage does is terroristically attempt to compel individuals to deny their natural instincts, to agree to rob themselves of their own freedom/autonomy, and to accept the brutal theft of their own personal freedoms and autonomy by the judicial, legal, and cultural demands and laws that accompany the marriage ritual. Not only sexual freedom, but many other freedoms as well, since the legal and judicial consequences of being married extend far beyond the issue of having sex, onto even more important and profound freedoms, such as financial and emotional freedom. If the marriage ritual had absolutely no legal force behind it, people who agree to have sex only with each other, would also retain the personal freedom to change their minds, to sever their "agreement" at any point in time, with no legal punishments resulting. So, people would have sex on a mutually exclusive basis for a few weeks, months, years, before one of them would finally decide to exercise his natural, instinctual right and desire to either stop having sex with this particular person, or to find some other person to have sex with. Even if the insane god myth was used as a tool of terroristic cultural coercion by society, to try and force the two people to keep having sex only with each other, which would be outrageously unjust, at least there would be no horribly punitive legal punishments involved, in the natural, instinctual choice by one or both people, to end their sexual relationship, and/or to find someone else to be sexually intimate with. It is simply mind-boggling, how any society can have the audacity to pretend to offer "freedom" to it's citizen-slaves, when the reality is that it's citizen-slaves are not even free to choose whom to have sexual contact with, without the threat of severe, utterly fascist legal and emotional punishments being imposed upon the citizen-slave for daring to try and exercise this most basic, fundamental, and instinctually natural of freedoms, if he has fallen prey to the terroristic brainwashing that this very same society has undertaken against him, in coercing him into agreeing to have gotten married and thus "assuming" and accepting the utterly enslaving legal and judicial doctrine which accompanies this insane and toxic ritual! If you are a Superior thinker, and you analyze the specific nature of this "self-victimization" marriage ritual, a process in which society convinces individuals to willingly sabotage and forfeit their own personal freedom and autonomy, then mercilessly exploits the so-called "free and willing" forfeiture after it has been made, you will soon realize that this exact same malevolent process is applied by societies within many other rituals and doctrines, totally separate and different from marriage, some of which have already been outlined by me within these Texts, others will be detailed in essays at this website that are yet to be written.

Okay, lets explore a few more angles of this utterly toxic ritual. How about Polygamy? Polygamy is a very specific offshoot of "regular" marriage, in which a man is allowed to have more than one wife, at the same time. Although not extremely popular in many current societies, polygamy remains legal in many societies, and even in america, I do believe it is perfectly legal in some areas, using the perverse decree that local religious "law" can be allowed to override national or judicial law, in terms of allowing polygamy to be treated as a legitimate form of marriage. Is this form of marriage more evil and perverse than regular marriage? That's a tough question to answer, and more importantly, it is not really a significant question or issue, because of the fact that all types of marriages, the very ritual of marriage itself, is completely and utterly malevolent in both design and consequence.

It's far more interesting and worthwhile, to look at how and why polygamy has come to be practiced and accepted by societies. The very first issue we have is this: Polygamy specifically empowers men to have multiple wives at the same time, but it does not allow women to have multiple husbands at the same time. In fact the very definition of Polygamy overtly states: The system of having more than one wife at a time. Why this gender bias? Because all human societies of the 20th and 21st centuries have been patriarchal, not matriarchal, and this is true even in the very rare cases where the president, prime minister, or other "supreme leader" of a society did or does happen to be female. The primary appeal that marriage carries for men, is the slave ownership aspect, the ability to own, possess, control, oppress, and dictate the life experiences of a female spouse, from a position of power and dominance. As is the case with all forms of slavery, having more than one slave is almost always considered better than merely having a single slave. This is the primary appeal of polygamy, and it is why this form of marriage overtly specifies that men can have multiple wives, but women may not have multiple husbands. Throughout the history of your diseased species, societal leaders have often been power-crazed, determined to have as many slaves as they possibly can, themselves. In legitimizing polygamy, both for themselves and in some cases for some of their male citizens, these societal leaders feed their own power-crazed need to own multiple slaves, as well as satisfy the desire of their male citizens to own multiple slaves.

Just as importantly, we must realize that the goal of society is to terroristically convince as many citizen-slaves as possible, to agree to get married and then to actually get married. Male humans have always possessed a slightly, emphasis on slightly, better ability to recognize the dangers, drawbacks, and pitfalls of the insane ritual of marriage, than female humans. This makes males slightly more resistant to societal promotion of marriage, and so societal leaders recognize that they must work harder on brainwashing/coercing their male population, with false information on the many benefits of marriage, in order to maximize the number of males who will fall victim to the marriage ritual. Women are so desperately eager to enslave themselves to men, that offering them multiple slaves is completely unnecessary. But for some men, the opportunity to own multiple females, as wives, via polygamous marriage, is indeed just enough to push them over the edge and get them to agree to get married, when they might still have been able to resist this toxic ritual if it mandated that they could only have one female slave at a time, as is the case with "regular" marriage. In addition, it is a proven fact that in most societies, the female population slightly outnumbers the male population. Not by a tremendous degree, but by a very real population imbalance. The ultimate goal of society is to get every single male and every single female, to get married at a young age. Obviously it is not possible for any society to achieve a 100% success rate in this regard, but that is the ultimate, genuine goal. Therefore, if there are slightly more females than males in a society, and the societal goal is to get every single citizen married to a person of the opposite gender, we are left with an imbalance. Not enough males, to match up one on one, with the females. In addition, as outlined above, males are slightly more resistant to marriage mythology/societal indoctrination, which means that the imbalance is further increased, in that in addition to there being slightly more females in the population, a greater percentage of the females will be eager and determined to get married, than males. Polygamy successfully addresses both of these issues, encouraging reluctant males to get married by offering them not just one, but potentially more than one, wife-slaves, and allowing a single man to satisfy the desires of 2, 3, 4, or more women to be married, without requiring each woman to find a separate male spouse of her own. The imbalance is equalized, to a degree, and the societal goal of providing an extra incentive to males, to get married, is met. We are left with a situation in which most societies which claim to be "enlightened" do not have a vested interest in making polygamy extremely popular, but still derive toxic benefits from allowing polygamist marriage to occur within their society, to a limited degree. Such is the case in america, as only in certain areas and within a few specific religious doctrines, I believe Mormonism would be the primary religious doctrine, are polygamous marriages allowed to occur and granted legal status. In some societies, those that are somewhat more honest in terms of revealing their bigotry and misogynistic structures than america is, polygamy is more common and popular. The bottom line is that all modern societies as of today, the early 21st century, are patriarchal and operate upon misogynistic, as well as other overtly fascist and unjust principals that serve to brutally victimize both male and female citizen-slaves. As to the issue of whether polygamy is a more brutal, unjust, or oppressive version of "regular" marriage, there is no reason to embrace this notion. Marriage itself is a brutal, unjust, oppressive, and toxic ritual. Whether or not a specific version of the marriage ritual, which differs only slightly in design structure from the normal, regular marriage ritual, is any more toxic than the regular version, is a moot point, not worthy of serious inquiry. It's like asking whether a lethal dose of cyanide swallowed in pill form, is worse than a lethal dose of cyanide swallowed in powder form. The toxicity of the marriage ritual itself, is so severe that whatever minor design variations may exist between different types of marriage structures, should be recognized as being essentially irrelevant.

Here's an interesting angle, which provides a crystal clear demonstration of how incredibly powerful this toxic ritual is. As we know, societies specifically decree that all marriages must involve people of differing genders. Men are to marry women, women are to marry men. This is because marriage is a part of Sacred Family Unit societal mythology, and it is specifically designed to cause children to be created. Society goes to extreme lengths to try and coerce all citizen-slaves of childbearing age, into creating and assuming possession of children, as I have already outlined in previous essays. Marriage is simply one tool, among thousands, that societies use to achieve this goal, and because of this, the marriage ritual specifically decrees that a man and a woman must be participants in every marriage ritual. In addition, while no concrete law exists to limit or control the age of people who get married to each other, extreme societal coercion is applied, in an effort to try and get people of childbearing age to marry each other, and not to allow a person of childbearing age to marry someone who has lost the ability to create children. This is a primary reason for why older men marrying younger women, face slightly less societal criticism than older women marrying younger men do. Men can often create children even at age 60, 65, 70, 75. Women can only create children until age 45 or so, in most cases. Therefore, if a 25 year old man marries a 50 year old woman, society is most unhappy, being that both parties, assuming they only have sexual intercourse with each other, will fail to create children. Society is more forgiving of a 25 year old woman marrying a 50 year old man, because of the fact that this couple very likely still retains the ability to create children. The point I am making here is that men cannot marry other men, and women cannot marry other women. This law exists in order to promote Sacred Family Unit and Breeder societal doctrine.

In a sane society, homosexual and lesbian humans would celebrate the fact that they have been spared the toxic, harmful ordeal of being legally enslaved to each other via the toxic marriage ritual. But of course your societies are not sane, and neither are you humans. Amazingly, in recent decades, homosexual and lesbian humans have been overtly seeking, in fact demanding, that their society allow them to get married, legally married, to each other! It is quite incredible, instead of rejoicing over the fact that they are being allowed to retain their freedom, to not be brutally enslaved to each other and to society via this fascist ritual, homosexuals and lesbians are upset over the fact that they cannot get married to each other. They are demanding that the same evil ritual that is being imposed upon heterosexuals, be imposed upon them, having no ability to recognize and understand that what they seek, marriage, is itself toxic and a horrifically dangerous, harmful societal trap. Understand how powerful the brainwashing forces of society must be, to make such a toxic, unnatural, and evil ritual appear to be so desirable and enticing, that people who are being spared it's harmful effects, are upset and angry at the perceived "injustice". Homosexuals and lesbians feel they are being discriminated against, in not being allowed to become "legally" married to each other. In reality of course, as regards this one specific ritual, it is the heterosexuals who are being brutally harmed and discriminated against, in being "allowed", in reality coerced, into getting married. In a sane society, the heterosexuals would be outraged, the heterosexuals would be protesting and demanding that they be given the same precious freedom that homosexuals and lesbians enjoy, the right to have sexual intimacy with, and to live together with, any human beings of their choosing, at any point in time during their lifetimes, without the insane and unnatural limitations and rules that come with the marriage ritual! But no, instead we have the "free" humans, upset and enraged over the fact that they are not being allowed to legally enslave themselves to each other and to their evil society. Utterly mind-boggling!

Yes, I am well aware of the fact that marriage provides certain economic and legal "advantages", that non-married "couples" do not enjoy. As I have already outlined above, these advantages are completely artificial in nature. They are perverse constructs of society, designed to make this evil ritual appear enticing and desirable enough to cause you citizen-slaves to agree to get married. I further understand that homosexual and lesbian humans are denied these so-called "advantages", by virtue of the fact that they cannot become legally married, within almost all societies. Is this a form of discrimination? No. The word discrimination is not applicable, because despite outward appearances, the marriage ritual carries with it so many extremely negative hidden consequences, that a person being denied the right to get married, while perhaps perceiving himself to be a victim of discrimination, is usually benefiting at least as much as he is suffering from, the "unequal treatment", and so the definition of discrimination does not legitimately apply. The extreme effectiveness of societal brainwashing and manipulation of reality perception, is beautifully illustrated by the fact that most homosexuals & lesbians are only or primarily able to recognize the artificial advantages that society provides to citizen-slaves via marriage, and completely unable to recognize the multitude of severe, potentially catastrophic disadvantages and personally harmful aspects of marriage. As is so often the case with you humans, Truth and rationality are turned upside down. The people who should be feeling glad and grateful to have escaped from the toxic, enslaving web of marriage, perversely feel that they are missing out on an important and valuable experience. They literally crave the slavery that comes with marriage, over the freedom that they are currently enjoying, and this is because they have been so profoundly brainwashed that they cannot even recognize or accurately define what it is to have personal freedom, what it is to be robbed of freedom and live as a beholden slave to others and to a society, and the clearly obvious Truth that whatever personal advantages the marriage ritual might offer them, are in reality invalid and an artificial construct of the malevolent design of the toxic ritual itself. The brutally oppressive, fascist, overtly harmful, enslaving aspects of the marriage ritual are rendered "invisible" to the average human, again as a result of being subjected to a lifetime of cultural brainwashing which completely strips the average human being of the ability to even recognize, much less integrate and accept, the Truths of life.

You see, the pervasive, perverse lie message of society is that marriage is good, marriage is healthy, marriage is normal, marriage is rewarding, marriage is desirable. All people who embrace these lies are hopelessly trapped within the overall lie structure, because simply by embracing the notion that marriage is good, they cannot ever come to the realization that marriage is evil. Simply by embracing the notion that marriage is normal, they can never come to the realization that marriage is completely unnatural. Simply by embracing the notion that marriage is desirable and rewarding, they can never come to the realization that marriage is brutally enslaving and toxic. These are definitional opposites. The only way to come to a realization of Truth, is to overtly reject the definitionally opposite lie, that society has maliciously addicted and brainwashed the individual into accepting and considering to be, a truth. And this is extremely difficult, practically impossible, for the vast majority of humans to ever do even a single time in their entire lives, much less on a consistent, ongoing basis.

Here is yet another minor but still fascinating angle to this suffocatingly malevolent ritual: In many societies, including america, a specific law has been enacted which gives spouses the legal right to refuse and reject court and judicial efforts to get the spouse to testify against his/her husband or wife. Think about how extraordinary this is, the judicial system absolutely has the power to order people to testify against their will, at trials and at court proceedings. This happens quite often. People are forced to testify as "hostile witnesses", and if they refuse, they can be thrown into prison, for being guilty of nothing more than refusing to speak, refusing to testify, refusing to answer the questions of a prosecutor, district attorney, or other empowered agent representing society itself. But, if you happen to be married to the person that the government wants you to talk about or testify about, all you have to do is invoke your "spousal right" to not incriminate or provide any type of information to "outside parties", about your spouse. And the judicial system loses it's legal authority to compel you to testify/provide the information. If you are simply a live-in lover, even if you can prove that you have been and continue to be sexually intimate with the person, this right is totally nonexistent. You have to be legally married to the person, in order to enjoy this extraordinary legal right, to be able to refuse to testify or talk about your spouse to governmental and prosecutorial authorities, a right that has been specifically and solely reserved for those humans who have legally enslaved themselves to each other, as society demands, via the act of legal marriage.

What a remarkable demonstration this is, of the lengths to which your societies will go, in their efforts to make marriage seem irresistibly enticing. Lets consider two young lovers, deciding to embark upon a crime spree. Assuming that they are intelligent, they will realize that society is offering them a tremendous, artificial and perversely irrational enticement to get married, that specifically relates to helping them get away with their crimes, more easily. If they remain as mere lovers, and one or both of them are captured after beginning their crime spree, the legal system can and will be used to terroristically compel them to incriminate and betray each other, at trial and at other preliminary hearings, police interrogations, etc... But if they choose to get legally married, they will enjoy a very specific legal and judicial protection under which they cannot be terroristically coerced, under threat of imprisonment or even monetary fine, to talk about, testify against, or otherwise provide incriminating evidence against, their spouse, in any type of an official court/judicial proceeding! So desperate is society to promote the toxic ritual of marriage, that it literally provides this extraordinary legal loophole, specifically set aside for married couples only, to help criminals avoid being convicted in court. Society has decided that it is more important to get all citizen-slaves, even criminally inclined individuals, to participate in the legal marriage ritual, than it is to obtain court/prosecutorial convictions against accused criminals. This is why the completely irrational, illogical, "spousal right" to refuse to testify, was enacted into law, remains solidly on the judicial books as a law, and is rock solid insofar as the future, destined to remain unchallenged as judicial law, no matter how perversely "tough on crime" the diseased and fascist society of america might try to become, in the coming years and decades.

I want to briefly touch upon the psychological horrors of the marriage ritual, because they are at least as important as the legal and enslaving horrors. Marriage is based upon an insane premise, namely, that it is "normal", necessary, and appropriate for a person to only have sexual contact with one other person, their spouse, for as long as they or their spouse lives. This notion is insane and invalid. But all married individuals believe the notion to be perfectly valid and true. As a result, when they feel sexually attracted to others, and/or engage in sexual contact with someone other than their spouse, they feel guilty, they feel as though they have done something "wrong", as though they have betrayed the obligation that they had, to their spouse. This causes severe psychological stress and trauma to the person who is being "unfaithful", even though there is absolutely no valid reason of any kind, for the person to feel this way, for having embraced and engaged in perfectly natural, sane sexual desires or activities. Only because society has addicted the individual to a completely insane and invalid mythology, is this psychological torment experienced. Even more outrageously, when a person finds out that their spouse has been "cheating" on them, by having sexual contact with some other human, the psychological distress is usually even greater, as experienced by this "victim." How ludicrous, the notion that a married person having sex with someone other than their spouse, is "cheating"! Cheating on what? Cheating how? Standing up and exercising a basic human right of freedom, is "cheating"? Defying an insane rule of an insane ritual devised by a deranged and evil society, constitutes cheating? This is simply ludicrous! And yet the fact remains, you brainwashed idiots usually get all upset, suffer severe psychological trauma, if and when you find out that your spouse has had sex with someone else. You feel betrayed, but more importantly, you feel inferior. Understand that the toxic marriage ritual is designed to artificially and invalidly boost the completely destroyed self-love ego, that most citizen-slaves have been saddled with. The married individual feels proud of the fact that they own a slave, that they have managed to convince a fellow human being to be and to serve as their slave, in having chosen to officially decree an intention to only have sex with them, out of all the billions of human beings in the world. This is true for both men and women, equally. You use this toxic ritual to feel better about yourself, while still in reality of course remaining filled with profound self-hatred, with the mindset of: "I must be okay, how else could I have gotten this other human being to agree to only have sex with me for the rest of his/her life, when there are billions of people of my gender in the world, that he/she could have chosen over me." When the spouse simply exercises his human right and has sex with someone else, this comforting emotional delusion is lost, and a tidal wave of negative emotion, which is often perceived as "betrayal" but is in fact much more rooted in self-hating, profound inferiority, overwhelms the "betrayed" spouse. All of the root emotions of self-hatred, inferiority, come rushing to the emotional surface, upon discovery of a spouse's "infidelity", and this is why there are often such extreme psychological reactions as physical assault, hysterical tears, suicide, and murder, on the part of the "betrayed" spouse. Any rational thinker recognizes that it is ludicrous to even blame a spouse, much less become emotionally overwhelmed, by the fact of a fellow human being having sex with someone. It makes no more rational sense for a spouse to become enraged over their mate having sex with someone else, than it does for the person to become enraged over a celebrity that he/she has never met, moving on to a new sexual partner. But of course no human who ever gets married, can be considered rational or sane, since this ritual is itself utterly irrational and insane in design and structure. What we have at play here is unnatural, invalid, toxic enmeshment, emotional enmeshment that is woven into the very core fabric of the toxic ritual of marriage. The psychological torment that a person whose spouse has "cheated" on them experiences, is a form of mental illness/derangement, that is completely and totally induced by and the fault of, the deranged and malevolently genocidal conduct and rituals of society itself, towards all citizens, via the toxic ritual of marriage, the deliberate stripping of all self-love abilities, the deliberate creation of dependent and toxically enmeshed psychological mindsets, among individuals.

The most harmful and pervasive type of addiction within the human species is not alcohol, drug, or even god-based. It is the addiction that human beings are forced by society to adopt, for other human beings. The inability by individuals to meet their own needs, to satisfy their emotional needs without developing toxic, unnatural dependencies upon other human beings. This is absolutely a type of addiction, and in terms of how widespread and universal it is, and how it carries severely negative consequences, at some point or another, in the lives of literally 99.9999999999% of all human beings, makes it the single most common and the single most harmful addiction, of them all. Marriage constitutes a union of two addicts, each addict desperately trying to get their own emotional and psychological needs met, by the other addict. Neither addict is able to meet their own needs, and so they seize upon this perverse, deranged lifeline that society tosses out to them, and they attempt to delude each other into believing that they feel love towards each other, even though in reality they cannot even love themselves. Of course the delusion is held together via a rubber band stretched to within a centimeter of the breaking point, at all times. There is no substance, no legitimacy, no Truth of any kind, not even instinctual Truth, within the delusion. And so when one party does something that finally reveals/demonstrates instinctual Truth, like having sex with someone else, the entire house of cards collapses, and extreme emotionalism, violence, even murder, sometimes results. It only looks like the wounded party feels "betrayed". Betrayal is not the primary emotion or mindset at work here. When the enraged wife who discovers her hubby has slept with someone else screams out, "I thought you loved me, how could you betray me like this!!", what she is really experiencing is an internal, emotional collapse of the invalid, subconsciously internalized illusion of self-love that she has built up within herself, by using the belief/myth that her husband loved her. You see, she could never love herself, but when the man claimed to love her and agreed to marry her, she was able to feel loved, she was able to form an artificial bridge between this invalid, externalized claim of love, and her very valid, internalized desire to feel self-love, that was stripped from her, as it is for 99.999 of all human beings, by society, during the course of her childhood. When she is forced to face up to the fact that her hubby has "betrayed" her, has given the love, i.e. sexual intimacy, that he "owed" to her, to someone else, the invalid myth of hubby loving her is shattered. But it's not the shattering of this invalid myth that causes the extreme emotional breakdown/rage. It is the chain reaction that the shattering of this myth results in, in that simultaneously with realizing that her hubby does not "love" her, the structurally invalid foundation of self love that she has been trying to nurture within herself, using the myth of hubby love, is shattered and completely collapses. This exact same rule applies to men, likely to an even more extreme degree, whose wives have sex with someone else. There is no significant gender difference here, but it is a fact that very often married men become even more dependent emotionally upon their wives, for the invalid feelings of self-worth, self-value, and self-love, than vice-versa. The bottom line is that a tremendous amount of severe psychological torment, that directly causes suicide, murder, mental breakdowns, and other horrific consequences on an equal level for both men and women, can be directly traced back to the utterly insane and toxic ritual of marriage, and it's deranged doctrines, mandates, and design structures.

I am going to be writing an entire essay on the fascist role that the media/journalism plays within all societies, but let me just very briefly state here that as regards the issue of marriage, love, and Sacred Family Unit mythology, the media, most especially the television media, plays an extremely significant propaganda role on behalf of societies, in legitimizing and fomenting public acceptance of, desired societal mythologies and brainwashings. Throughout the history of television broadcasts in america, all of the most popular, most highly publicized television shows have featured married couples, as well as Sacred Family Unit design structures in general. From "Leave It To Beaver", to "Happy Days", to "The Addams Family", to "All In The Family", to "The Simpsons", to "Married With Children", we see an incredible string of long-running TV shows, all revolving around the same foundation, a Sacred Family Unit involving a married couple. Some people might say that writers of TV shows grew up in families, had married parents, and therefore simply "write what they know" in their television show scripts. There is an element of truth to this claim, absolutely. And the claim that writers are only writing scripts that follow the same theme as earlier, financially successful shows followed, has merit as well. However, the pervasiveness and consistency with which these shows have constantly shown up and become extremely popular, indicates that they receive more promotion, more support, more legitimization from governmental and societal leadership positions, than do the "edgy", not familial, not married couple based, TV shows. Societal leaders understand that children and adults raised on the boob tube, literally suckling on TV images and messages as an infant suckles on a teat, who are constantly seeing depictions of familial and married life portrayed as the only proper, desirable, and normal way to live as adults, will naturally become "fans" of not only the TV shows themselves, but of the toxic rituals, such as marriage, that the shows subversively and intentionally promote and legitimize.

The final two shows that I listed, "The Simpsons" and "Married With Children", are worthy of a bit of extra comment. The Simpsons is currently the longest running episodic show on american television, while Married With Children enjoyed a long run, and achieved "cult" status in some circles. Both of these shows were marketed as being extremely "cutting edge and controversial". In fact both of these shows have been actively protested against, by mainstream religious and other socially "conservative" freaks/fascists. It was said that both shows were too "irreverent", they made fun of cherished societal customs like worship of god, respect for parents, traditional familial design structures, etc... And yet both shows were allowed to thrive and became extremely popular. The reality is, both of these shows were/are 100% rooted in Sacred Family Unit and Marriage mythologies, despite all the claims of "shocking irreverence". The Simpsons features a married couple, long time married couple devoted to each other, raising three children. Married With Children had a long-time married couple, pretending in a "hip" way to hurl insults at each other, but in fact these insults were nothing more than jokes, and treated as such via the laugh track. They too were a long-time married couple, who created children and were raising their biological creations in a dedicated manner. So in reality, these two so-called controversial and cutting edge TV shows, are in fact absolutely traditional and conservative, in terms of their core design structure. They legitimize and promote marriage. Now, these shows do have "modern" storylines, especially involving the children, that certainly could be labeled as cutting edge and "hip", although I would not use the term controversial. So lets understand what we have: Two shows that promote traditional family units and marriage, but are made out to appear hip, cutting edge, and controversial. What would be the target audience here? Young adults, teens, and children who consider themselves to be hip and cutting edge, or who want to be hip and cutting edge. They are the target audience. Societal leaders want this target audience to watch these two shows, because the shows are only pretending, on a surface level, to be subversive and defying of "traditional" lifestyles. In reality, the shows are promoting and legitimizing traditional, completely invalid/insane societal doctrines and rituals such as marriage, and that is the actual "subversion" that occurs when people become fans of these shows. They think they are being subversive, they think they are defying the traditions of their parents, the young people who become fans of these and similar shows, but in reality the exact opposite is occurring. In other words, on a subconscious, intellectually manipulative, lie-based level, these young people are being taught that accepting the legitimacy and embracing the concepts of traditional family units and marriage, is a hip, cutting edge, and "subversive" thing to do! After all, if The Simpsons is a subversive, hip, cutting edge show, and it features an intact, traditional family unit in which both parents have been married to each other for a long time and have a stable, secure marriage, then traditional family units and long-term marriages are the proper life goals for the hip, cutting edge fans of the show, to aspire to achieve in their own, real, lives. This is an example of how manipulatively devious your diseased societies are. Leaders of societies understand that it is natural for children to want to "rebel" against tradition, and so they deliberately create TV shows that provide a surface illusion of hip, cutting edge rebelliousness, an illusion that the "old and stodgy traditions of the parents" are being defied and challenged, recognizing that young people will be attracted to such shows, and will believe that they are defying societal tradition by embracing the storylines and messages of these shows, even though in reality, the core messages and ideologies being promoted within the design structures of these shows, are completely traditional in nature and subliminally promote the exact same toxic ideologies, such as marriage, that all the "older" generations have already been addicted to and brainwashed into embracing.

It is undeniable that the insane ritual of marriage is genocidally harmful to children, as well as to all so-called adults, who are coerced into getting married. Slavery is what marriage is all about, and marriage is the defining, primary ritual utilized in officially turning children into subhuman pieces of owned property. Sacred Family Unit mythology, has marriage as it's foundational core. The brutal enslavement of children to their parents, is legitimized by the toxic ritual of marriage, which is designed to create a Sacred Family Unit that is under the legal control of the governmental/societal leadership. Marriage creates a legal trap, within which all children born or brought into the Sacred Family Unit, become hopelessly trapped. In fact, the government itself officially declares that only under the most extreme circumstances, will it even consider intervening in the "private affairs" of a married couple, for the sake of protecting and defending the health, safety, treatment, welfare, and even survival, of any children that are under the legal ownership of the married couple. Getting to own child-slaves, to have complete and unchallenged control and domination over every aspect of a helpless child's life, is one of the primary enticements and rewards that society holds out to people, in an attempt to convince them to get married. Married couples perceive and treat their children as being slaves, because that is in fact the reality, the official, factual Truth, of what they are, as decreed by the societal and cultural structure. Almost always, when a marriage is about to collapse, both parties seek to coerce their child(ren) into siding with them, and turning against the other spouse. Even more universally, once an actual collapse of the marriage occurs, both parents demand to retain possession of and primary access to their child(ren). This is almost never because they feel genuine love for their children, they cannot even love themselves, much less other human beings. They see their child as being a valuable piece of owned property, as well as a judicial birthright. Meaning that they believe they have an unquestionable right under law, to possess as a slave, their created or otherwise legally acquired child(ren). This belief is simply a logical manifestation of the insane child-slavery/sacred family unit doctrine that societies throughout the world, decree as law and as a basic, proper, ideological mindset.

Many parents/married couples will kill their child, rather than lose primary ownership of the child, or even rather than simply facing the legal threat of losing custody. This is a beautiful illustration of just how utterly evil your societies are. Not the parents themselves. They are not evil. They are simply accurate reflections of the lifetime of insane ideology and deranged doctrine, that their society has imposed upon them. They kill their legally owned children because their society has taught them that legally owned children are nothing more than subhuman pieces of owned property. They kill their legally owned children because they have been stripped by society of the ability to love themselves. They kill their legally owned children because they have been compelled by their own suffering, inflicted upon them by society, to create a dependent relationship towards "their" children, within which they feel they need to possess the love of the child, and by proxy the child itself, in order to cope with the horrific emotional emptiness of their own lives. They kill their legally owned children because they believe that children go to heaven when they die, that parents are always mystically together with their children, and therefore when they die, they are guaranteed to be "reunited" with their children, in heaven. There are dozens more reasons, but all of them have the same origin: Insane beliefs, ideologies, mindsets, that they have been overtly taught, told, and brainwashed with, by society itself, by societal decree, doctrine, ideology, and "traditional customs". And of course for every parent/married person who outright kills their child, hundreds more brutally and systematically torture their child, in a non-fatal but sometimes even more torturous manner. Marriage is a root cause of genocidal child torture and murder. It legitimizes and grants legal authority, to the most perverse and harmful Sacred Family Unit ideologies. The toxic legal enmeshment that is created, between the two married people towards each other, and between them and society itself, provides an incubation chamber within which the degree of child dehumanization, child slavery, officially decreed worthlessness of the child as an independent life form, is greatly expanded and increased. It is the actual fact of being a married couple, while possessing a child, that directly causes this expansion of child dehumanization within the framework of the Sacred Family Unit.

Lets keep in mind the fact that your diseased societies do happily allow children, even those under the age of 18, to get married. So this is yet another form of mass child victimization as practiced and legitimized by society. Make no mistake, societies want children to get married. They younger they are, the better for society. The more immature, childlike, gullible, uninsightful, the better. Because marriage is a trap. Once you are caught in the trap, society has achieved one of it’s primary goals in controlling and dictating your life path, to it’s perverse will. It doesn’t matter how old you are when you are captured within this trap, and there are really no disadvantages of any kind for society, if you are caught at age 15, 16, 17, etc… The fact that children who get married at a very young age have a slightly higher divorce rate than those who get married when they are older, is not a significant drawback. Not at all, since divorce does not really end any marriage, it simply alters the parameters of the marriage and allows the "newly freed" individual to go out and find someone else to enslave himself to. Getting a 15 year old child hooked on marriage is just perfect. If the marriage fails, no big deal, the child, even years later, is likely to be eager to get married again, since children are drawn to what they are familiar with, and once they embrace a powerfully promoted societal ritual like marriage, it is very rare for them to develop the insight and independent thinking ability that is required, to reject the legitimacy of the marriage ritual at any future point in time, during their lifetime.

The marriage ritual, and more specifically the so-called "marriage vows", absolutely foster, sponsor, and cause an enormous amount of violence, abuse, victimization, suffering, mental illness, torture, death, within the human race. This is primarily because the marriage ritual and marriage vows are fundamentally insane and completely unnatural. The attempt by society to force people to adopt and accept this insane and unnatural ritual, is successful. Most people do get married, and so the effort must be judged as a success, when you look at the goal that society has, and achieves. The genocidally harmful consequences that result for individual human beings, on a mass scale, are of very little if any importance to societal leaders, since the structural design of societal ideology is inherently evil. Belief in god, sacred family unit doctrine, war, economic systems, political systems, these rituals all cause genocidal harm to individuals, on a mass scale, and they are all deliberately and overtly sponsored and legitimized by societal leaders. Marriage is simply yet another toxic ritual, that fits into this category. There is no chance that any human society will choose to do away with the toxic ritual of marriage, anytime within the next 500 years. No way. There are simply too many malevolent benefits that society derives from terroristically imposing this ritual upon you creatures. Human societies are designed to practice and engage in genocidal evil, while consistently maintaining the illusion that they are decent and moral, so the factual reality of how several billion people are victimized by the marriage ritual, on a worldwide basis, is simply laughed at and shrugged off. Speculating on the impossible, which is still an intellectually valuable exercise, we must realize that there are two primary components to the insane marriage ritual. There is a legal component, and a cultural component. A Superior society would realize that going "cold turkey", in terms of suddenly, abruptly, and completely terminating the ritual of marriage, declaring it illegal and "banning" it, as well as declaring all existing marriages to be null and void, might not be the best strategy. It would certainly be a wonderful thing, greatly improving the quality of life of every person living within the society. But the pathetic thing about you creatures is, you absolutely despise change. You are horrifically addicted to the deranged ideologies that you have already been brainwashed into embracing. This type of a sudden, totally unexpected societal decree would likely terrify you creatures into overthrowing the existing government/society, instead of thanking it for freeing you from the enslavement and other horrors of marriage.

Therefore, a better reform strategy, for the first generation, would be to eliminate all legal aspects and powers of the marriage ritual, while still allowing people who are married at the time that this change is made, to remain married, as well as to allow people to "get married" if they so desire, in a "play" ceremony that carries absolutely no legal standing, ramifications, or powers of any kind. Removing all legal standing from the marriage ritual, while still allowing for the "cultural tradition" of the marriage ceremony to occur, would allow for a slower, less terrifying transition to a complete elimination of this ritual, which might take up to 150 years to totally take root. Eliminating all legal components would provide a significant degree of relief, in terms of how severe the individual suffering that is caused by this toxic ritual, is. And yet it would still be very important, vital in fact, that the ultimate goal be to completely eliminate the marriage ritual from the cultural landscape. The ritual itself causes genocidal harm. All that the legal attachments that societies apply to the marriage ritual do, is greatly increase the amount and the severity of the suffering and harm that this ritual causes. And yet we must be practical and thoughtful in our reform proposals. We must realize that due to the pathetic inferiority of the vast majority of the human race, implementing complete, immediate reforms to long-time, societally mainstream, deranged policy structures, may be impossible. There is nothing wrong with taking gradual steps, as long as the steps are bold and major. Eliminating all, and I do mean all, legal standing, authority, consequence, and power of the marriage ritual, in one fell swoop, would be a properly bold step for a Superior society to take, and allowing the cultural ritual of marriage to still be practiced, for awhile, stripped of all legal standing, might well be the best way to allow the transition to sanity to proceed, while minimizing the danger of the panicked masses of inferiors rising up in terror at the prospect of regaining their sexual and other freedoms.

In conclusion, I want to say that the currently high divorce rates within some societies, are not a true measure of how utterly perverse and unnatural marriage is. The true measure can be seen in the reality of marriage relationships. The fact that 90% of all married people do have sexual contact with somebody else, at some point during their marriage, despite the fact that they are under a direct threat of "punishment from god", as expressly stated in the traditional marriage vows that they willingly took. The fact that if they were being honest, fewer than 10% of all currently married individuals, could truly claim to be happy and enjoying life to it's fullest possible degree. The fact that hatred, rage, cruelty, violence, victimization of a spouse by their marriage partner, is at an epidemic level throughout the world, with literally 98% of all spouses feeling or expressing hatred, rage, violence, cruelty, towards their mate, on a regular basis. The fact that society must and does employ, in terroristic fashion, both the threat of physical/eternal punishment from god, and the threat of judicial/legal punishment via it's law enforcement/court system, to get people to become married, and to get them to stay married. The fact that no other species of life engages in this ritual. The fact that when you look at the design structure of marriage, the outline and the mandates of this ritual, from every possible angle and perspective, all that you can or will ever see is artificiality and unnaturalness. Nothing natural, nothing instinctual, nothing legitimate, nothing True. All you see is the diseased hand and the diseased mind of evil humanity, of power-crazed, human societal leaders, creating an insane ritual, dressing it up in camouflage, marketing the monstrosity as being a saintly nirvana, and terroristically imposing the monstrosity upon all of mankind. That is the Truth. And that is what marriage is. A monstrosity, one monstrosity among thousands, used to oppress, victimize, and enslave you, the citizens who live as members of societies.

Copyright 2004-2054 The Seer of Forbidden Truth, All Rights Reserved. None of the content of this essay may be reproduced or redistributed by anyone without the expressed and written consent of The Seer of Forbidden Truth. Violators will be prosecuted.