Censored 2004: The Top 25 Censored Media Stories of 2002-2003
 http://www.projectcensored.org/publications/2004/

#01: The Neoconservative Plan for Global Dominance.
#02: Homeland Security Threatens Civil Liberty.
#03: US Illegally Removes Pages from Iraq U.N. Report.
#04: Rumsfeld's Plan to Provoke Terrorists.
#05: The Effort to Make Unions Disappear.
#06: Closing Access to Information Technology.
#07: Treaty Busting by the United States.
#08: US/British Forces Continue Use of Depleted Uranium Weapons Despite
Massive Evidence of Negative Health Effects.
#09: In Afghanistan: Poverty, Women's Rights, and Civil Disruption Worse
than Ever.
#10: Africa Faces Threat of New Colonialism.
#11: U.S. Implicated in Taliban Massacre.
#12: Bush Administration Behind Failed Military Coup in Venezuela.
#13: Corporate Personhood Challenged.
#14: Unwanted Refugees a Global Problem.
#15: U.S. Military's War on the Earth.
#16: Plan Puebla-Panama and the FTAA.
#17: Clear Channel Monopoly Draws Criticism.
#18: Charter Forest Proposal Threatens Access to Public Lands.
#19: U.S. Dollar vs. the Euro: Another Reason for the Invasion of Iraq.
#20: Pentagon Increases Private Military Contracts.
#21: Third World Austerity Policies: Coming Soon to a City Near You.
#22: Welfare Reform Up For Reauthorization, but Still No Safety Net.
#23: Argentina Crisis Sparks Cooperative Growth.
#24: Aid to Israel Fuels Repressive Occupation in Palestine.
#25: Convicted Corporations Receive Perks Instead of Punishment.
________________________________________________________________________

US Plan for Global Domination Tops Project Censored's Annual List.
 http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=16784
By Kari Lydersen, AlterNet
September 17, 2003

We know a lot more now about the dangers and disasters of U.S. empire
building in Iraq - the ongoing bloodshed on the ground, expansion of
terrorist activities, the huge budget busting costs of occupation, the
stretching and undermining of the military, and the increased sense of fear
and insecurity that many Americans feel as a result of the invasion and its
potential for blowback.

We also now have a better handle on the immediate and flimsy reasons for
the invasion. Bush told us we were going to war in Iraq because Saddam
Hussein had weapons of mass destruction that threatened us; he was
reconstituting his nuclear weapons programs (the aluminum tubes, the
uranium from Africa); he had huge stocks of chemical and biological weapons
that could be launched somehow in a way that threatened the US. And finally
that Saddam was working with Al Qaeda. According to some polls, as much as
70 percent of the public believed this. But now it seems clear these were
all falsehoods. The lies and deceptions Bush and his minions were feeding
to the media are making their way into public discourse and are being
covered fairly extensively in the press, in columns by Paul Krugman and
Maureen Dowd in the NY Times and
in wide ranging reporting at the Washington Post, and elsewhere.

But far, far less is known about the planning and the actors that brought
us this foreign policy disaster? What ideas and worldviews motivated the
push to overreach and try to dominate the globe, with Iraq as step number
one? What secrets, maneuvers behind the scenes policy power struggles after
the attacks of 9/11, led the U.S. to invade a country that had nothing to
do with 9/11?

The reminder that the media often reports the 'news" as fed to it by those
in power, and skips past the real news - the reasons for the behaviors
and policies - is good reason for the continued existence of Project
Censored, a program in its 27th year that collects under-reported stories
from around the country and compiles a list of the top 10 "censored
stories" as well as 15 runner-ups. About 200 students and faculty from
Sonoma State University compiled and reviewed the stories for Project
Censored. The project describes its mission "to stimulate responsible
journalists to provide more mass media coverage of those under-covered
issues and to encourage the general public to demand mass media coverage of
those issues or to seek
information from other sources."

Most of the stories on Project Censored's Top Ten relate to the US's war on
terrorism and the invasion of Iraq. On the one hand, this emphasis
indicates how the issue dominates the news, but on the other, how few news
consumers really understand very little about how it happened and why.
Taken together, these stories paint a chilling picture of a long-ranging
plan to dominate huge sections of the globe militarily and economically,
and to silence dissent, curb civil liberties and undermine workers' rights
in the course of it. Some of the information published as part of the
project is pretty shocking, like the fact that the US removed 8,000
incriminating pages from Iraq's weapons report to the UN; or that Donald
Rumsfeld may have a plan to deliberately provoke terrorists so we can
react. Other issues like the attacks on civil liberties have been covered
in the mainstream press, but not in the comprehensive way Project Censored
would like to see.

The "Top Ten Censored Stories" followed by the 15 runner-ups:

1. The Neoconservative Plan for Global Dominance
Sources: The Sunday Herald (9/15/02), Harper's Magazine (10/02), Mother
Jones (3/03), Pilger.com (12/12/02)

Project Censored has decided that the incredible lack of public knowledge
of the US plan for total global domination, represented by the Project for
a New American Century (PNAC) represents the media's biggest failure over
the past year. The PNAC plans advocated the attacks on Iraq and Afghanistan
and other current foreign policy objectives, long before the Sept. 11
terrorist attacks.

Chillingly, one document published by the PNAC in 2000 actually describes
the need for a "new Pearl Harbor" to persuade the American public to accept
the acts of war and aggression the administration wants to carry out. "But
most people in the country are totally unaware that the PNAC exists," said
Peter Phillips, a professor at Sonoma State and major domo of The Project
Censored Project, "and that failure has aided and abetted this disaster in
Iraq."

According to Project Censored authors. "In the 1970s, the United States and
the Middle East were embroiled in a tug-of-war over oil. At the time, the
prospect of seizing control of Arab oil fields by force was considered out
of line. Still, the idea of Middle East dominance was very attractive to a
group of hard-line Washington insiders that included Dick Cheney, Donald
Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, William Kristol and other
operatives. During the Clinton years they were active in conservative think
tanks like the PNAC. When Bush was elected they came roaring back into
power.

In an update for the Project Censored Web site, Mother Jones writer Robert
Dreyfuss notes "There was very little examination in the media of the role
of oil in American policy towards Iraq and the Persian Gulf, and what
coverage did exist tended to pooh-pooh or debunk the idea that the war had
anything to do with it."

2. Homeland Security Threatens Civil Liberties

Sources: Global Outlook (Winter 2003), Rense.com (2-11-03 & Global Outlook,
Volume 4), Center for Public Integrity (publicintegrity.org) Corporate
Media partial coverage: Atlanta Journal-constitution (5/11/03/), The Tampa
Tribune (3/28/03), Baltimore Sun (2/21/03)

While the media did cover the Patriot Act, and the so-called Patriot Act
II, which was leaked to the press in February 2003, there wasn't sufficient
analysis of some of the truly dangerous and precedent-setting components of
both acts. This goes especially for the shocking provision in Patriot II
that would allow even US citizens to be treated as enemy combatants and
held without counsel, simply on suspicion of connections to terrorism.

"Under section 501 a US citizen engaging in lawful activity can be picked
off the streets or from home and taken to a secret military tribunal with
no access to or notification of a lawyer, the press or family." This would
be considered justified if the agent 'inferred from the conduct' suspicious
intention.

Fortunately Patriot I is under major duress in Congress as both parties are
supporting significant revisions. Yet, President Bush, realizing that he
and his unpopular Attorney General John Ashcroft are losing popular
support, is threatening a veto, and has aggressively gone on the offense in
favor of the repugnant Patriot II. Let's see if the media has learned its
lesson from Patriot I. Will it probe the new legislation much more
thoroughly than the first round, which received inadequate analysis post
9/11?

3. US Illegally Removes Pages from Iraq UN Report
Source: The Humanist and ArtVoice (March/April 2003), first covered by Amy
Goodman on Democracy Now!

Story three is the shockingly under-reported fact that the Bush
administration removed a whopping 8,000 of 11,800 pages from the report the
Iraqi government submitted to the UN Security Council and the International
Atomic Energy Agency. The pages included details on how the US had actually
supplied Iraq with chemical and biological weapons and the building blocks
for weapons of mass destruction. The pages reportedly implicate not only
Reagan and Bush administration officials but also major corporations
including Bechtel, Eastman Kodak and Dupont and the US Departments of
Energy and Agriculture.

In comments to Project Censored, Michael Niman, author of one of the
articles cited, noted that his article was based on secondary sources,
mostly from the international press, since the topic received an almost
complete blackout in the US press. Referring to his first Project Censored
nomination in 1989, in which he went into the bush in Costa Rica, he said,
"With such thorough self-censorship in the US press, reading the
international press is now akin to going into the remote bush."

4. Rumsfeld's Plan to Provoke Terrorists
Source: CounterPunch (11/1/02)

Moscow Times columnist and CounterPunch contributor Chris Floyd developed
this story off a small item in the LA Times in October 2002 about secret
armies the Pentagon has been developing around the world. "The Pro-active,
Preemptive Operations Group (or "Pee-Twos') will carry out secret missions
designed to 'stimulate reactions' among terrorist groups, provoking them
into committing violent acts which would then expose them to
'counterattack' by US forces," Floyd wrote. "The Pee-Twos will thus come in
handy whenever the Regime hankers to add a little oil-laden real estate or
a new military base to the Empire's burgeoning portfolio. Just find a nest
of violent malcontents, stir 'em with a stick, and presto: instant
justification for whatever level of intervention-conquest-raping that you
might desire."

Floyd notes that while the story received considerable play in
international and alternative media, it has hardly been mentioned in the
mainstream US press.

"At first glance, this decided lack of interest might seem a curious
reaction, given the American media's insatiable - and profitable -
obsession with terrorism," he told Project Censored. "But the media's
equally intense abhorrence of moral ambiguity - especially when it
involves possible American complicity in mayhem and murder - makes the
silence easier to understand."

5. The Effort to Make Unions Disappear
Sources: Z Magazine, (11/20/02), War Times (10/11 2002), The Progressive
(11/03), The American Prospect (3/03)

The war on terrorism has also had the convenient side benefit for
conservatives of making it easier for employers and the government to
suppress organized labor in the name of national security. For example, in
October 2002 Bush was able to force striking International Longshore and
Warehouse Union members back to work in the San Francisco Bay Area in the
name of national safety.

Chicago journalist Lee Sustar noted that labor coverage is usually woefully
inadequate in the mainstream media, even though union membership, while
shrinking, still makes up a national constituency 13 million strong.

"Twenty years ago every paper had a beat reporter on labor who knew what
was going on," he said. "Today that's not the case. Besides a token story
on Labor Day or a human-interest story here and there, you don't see
coverage of labor. You only see coverage from the business side." said
Sustar, Although Steven Greenhouse, the labor reporter for the New York
Times is one obvious exception to Sustar's claim.

Ann Marie Cusac, whose story for The Progressive about the decimation of
unions was cited, said she thinks the position of organized labor is worse
than it has ever been.

She combed National Labor Relations Board files for egregious examples of
the lengths to which employers will go to bust unions. And she found a lot.
"They had a woman with carpal tunnel syndrome pulling nails out of boards
above her head, because they wanted her to go on disability so she couldn't
organize," she said. "But she did it, even knowing she might disable
herself. The willingness of people to sacrifice, because they know how
important it is to unionize, is a sign of hope."

6. Closing Access to Information Technology
Source: Dollars and Sense (9/02)

The potential closing of access to digital information is a development
that could have a harmful effect on the powerful role online media plays in
side stepping media gate keepers and keeping people better informed. "The
FCC and Congress are currently overturning the public-interest rules that
have encouraged the expansion of the Internet up until now," writes Arthur
Stamoulis, whose story was published in Dollars and Sense.

The Internet currently provides a buffet of independent and international
media sources to counter the mostly homogenous offerings of mainstream US
media, especially broadcast. As the shift to broadband gains momentum,
cable companies are trying hard to dominate the market, and eventually
control access.

In 2002 the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) decided to allow cable
networks to avoid common carrier requirements. Now the giant phone
companies, who offer the competitive DSL services, want the same freedoms
to control access to their lines. In the long run, instead of the thousands
of small ISP services to choose from, the switch from dial-up to broadband
means that users will have less and less choice over who provides their
internet access.

While the media finally woke up and gave significant coverage to the recent
public rebellion against the FCC, which voted to increase media
concentration even further, there has been scant coverage to the problem
that the Internet as we now it might be lost.

7. Treaty Busting By the United States
Sources: Connections (6/02), The Nation (4/02), Ashville Global Report
(6/20-26/02), Global Outlook (Summer 2002)

"The US is a signatory to nine multilateral treaties that it has either
blatantly violated or gradually subverted," says Project Censored. These
include the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the Treaty Banning Antipersonnel
Mines and the Kyoto Protocol on global warming. Just as the Bush
administration is crowing about the possibility of Saddam Hussein
manufacturing nuclear or chemical weapons, it is violating treaties meant
to curb these threats, including the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and
the Chemical Weapons Commission.

8. US/British Forces Continue Use of Depleted Uranium Weapons Despite
Massive Evidence of Negative Health Effects
Sources: The Sunday Herald (3/30/03), Hustler Magazine (6/03), Children of
War (3/03)

The eighth story on the list deals with another subject that victims have
tried to get into the mainstream media for over a decade - the US's use
of depleted uranium in Iraq, in both the recent invasion and in the Gulf
War. Depleted uranium (DU) was also used in Afghanistan, Kosovo and Bosnia.

The writers cited, including the hard-core porn magazine Hustler, note that
cancer rates have skyrocketed in Iraq since the first Gulf War, most likely
because of the massive contamination of the soil with DU from the
explosive, armor-piercing munitions. US soldiers are also victims of this
travesty, suffering Gulf War syndrome and other ailments that many feel
sure are linked to their exposure to DU.

Reese Erlich, a freelance journalist who reported on the topic for a
syndicated radio broadcast and related web site report, said that the
federal government has dealt with the issue of DU the way the tobacco
industry deals with its liability problems. "They'll fog the issue so no
one can say for sure what's happening," he said. "They'll commission
studies so they can say, 'There are conflicting reports,' 'We need more
information.'"

He noted that while the US media is quiet about the issue, it is a hot
topic in the international press. "When you get outside the US, the media
is much more critical," he said. "They refer to it as a weapon of mass
destruction. This will be a legacy the US has left in Iraq. Long after the
electricity is repaired and the oil wells are pumping, children will be
getting cancer. The US knew this would happen, it can't claim ignorance."

9. In Afghanistan: Poverty, Women's Rights and Civil Disruption Worse then
Ever
Sources: The Nation (10/14/02), Left Turn (3-4/03), The Nation (4/29/02),
Mother Jones (7-8/02) Mainstream Coverage: Toronto Star (3/2/03)

Though his work isn't cited here, Erlich also reported on the topic of the
ninth story on the list, the continuing poverty, civil disruption and
repression of women in Afghanistan. While the country has virtually dropped
off the radar screen in the US press and public consciousness, it is
suffering its worst decade of poverty ever. Warlords and tribal fiefdoms
continue to rule the country, and women are as repressed as ever, contrary
to the feel-good images of burqa-stripping that have been broadcast in the
media here.

"Reporters by and large don't go to Afghanistan to report on what they
see," said Erlich, who spent several weeks reporting in the country. "They
go to the state department officials, so everything is filtered through
these rose-colored glasses, saying things are getting better. But they're
not."

10. Africa Faces New Threat of New Colonialism
Source: Left Turn (7-8/02), Briarpatch, Vol. 32, No. 1, Excerpted from The
CCPA Monitor, (10/02), New Internationalist (1-2/03)

While Afghanistan is being essentially ignored, the tenth story on the list
shows how African countries are getting plenty of attention from the US -
but not the kind of attention they need. These stories deal with the
formation in June, 2002 of the New Partnership for Africa's Development, or
NEPAD, by a group of leaders from the world's eight most powerful countries
(the G8) who claim to be carrying out an anti-poverty campaign for the
continent. But the group doesn't include the head of a single African
nation, and critics charge that the plan is more about opening the
continent to international investment and looting its resources than
fighting poverty.

"NEPAD is akin to Plan Colombia in its attempt to employ Western
development techniques to provide economic opportunities for international
investment," says Project Censored.

The Project Censored awards ceremony will take place Oct. 4 in San Rafael,
Calif. For tickets or more information, visit the Web site at
 http://www.projectcensored.org.

The 15 stories cited as runners-up to the top ten most censored stories of
the year are the following:

#11: U.S. Implicated in Taliban Massacre.
#12: Bush Administration Behind Failed Military Coup in Venezuela.
#13: Corporate Personhood Challenged.
#14: Unwanted Refugees a Global Problem.
#15: U.S. Military's War on the Earth.
#16: Plan Puebla-Panama and the FTAA.
#17: Clear Channel Monopoly Draws Criticism.
#18: Charter Forest Proposal Threatens Access to Public Lands.
#19: U.S. Dollar vs. the Euro: Another Reason for the Invasion of Iraq.
#20: Pentagon Increases Private Military Contracts.
#21: Third World Austerity Policies: Coming Soon to a City Near You.
#22: Welfare Reform Up For Reauthorization, but Still No Safety Net.
#23: Argentina Crisis Sparks Cooperative Growth.
#24: Aid to Israel Fuels Repressive Occupation in Palestine.
#25: Convicted Corporations Receive Perks Instead of Punishment.

Kari Lydersen, a regular contributor to AlterNet, also writes for the
Washington Post and is an instructor for the Urban Youth International
Journalism Program in Chicago. She can be reached at  karilyde@aol.com .

=========================