Skip to content or view screen version

False Alarm: White House Evacuated

Clayton Hallmark | 20.11.2003 16:58

The evacuation of the West Wing of the White House was just a false alarm.

It all goes to show the extreme state of paranoia in the U.S. Administration and the lingering incompetence of the FAA and NORAD that allowed the 9/11 attacks to occur.

The report of a plane within 5 miles of the protected airspace of the White House was wrong.

The radar was bad. That was it.

There are a lot of things on the White Houses radar screen that do not exist in reality, like WMD in Iraq, and Iraq-al-Qaeda connnection, and Iraq-Niger uranium.

Clayton Hallmark

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

The chimp in the bush was already evacuated

20.11.2003 17:32

Bush's brain as evacuated long ago, and replaced by a fundamentalist Christian terrorist megalomaniac brain.

Don Jonson

It wasn't a plane, according to CNN it was a UFO -unidentified target.

20.11.2003 17:51


BUSH = Interstellar terrorist
He's pissed off the whole world now he's pissed off the grays! Apperantly they are unhappy with Cheney's pushing to have the US withdrawl from the UN's 1967 Outer Space Treaty. This prohibts anyone from placing nuclear weapons in earth orbit.

Incidentally, this makes the second time this year that the radars over the white house picked up an 'uncorrelated target' which it assumed to be a plane without a transponder. The last time this happened there were visual sightings of a disc shaped object in northern virginia.

On another note hell has frozen over! CNN not only refered to a UFO today but they covered the London and Miami protests well. Even going so far as to show the toppling of the Bush statue in Trafalgar square!

bob lazar

Am I Paranoid

20.11.2003 19:12

Let's just assume there hadn't been any bombs in Turkey today. Giving the White house the benefit of the doubt, there is no way they'd have known this was going to happen. Let' presume Michael Jackson wasn't in trouble. The US press would have had to have placed a greater emphasis on the anti-bush protests in London. Do you think anyone could accuse the US authorities of making news to eclipse the stuff we want the US public to see?

Is anyone with me on this?

Hopefully Not

Possibly

21.11.2003 04:24

While i dont doubt it is beyond Bush's regime to pull a few strings and get the whole micheal Jackson thing going this week as opposed to any other, so that the press has better things to report then on the anti bush march (it was awsome) surely they would also be missing out on an opportunity to promote the visit as well? all those pics of Bush and the queen...

But then i suppose it does still create a situation where the press does have limited air time, and therefore can only report the pro Bush stuff, before geeting round to the protests, which, shamefully never quite hits the lime light.

So yer, damn Bush and his networks amoungst America's most influencial.

karic