Spurious & Rolling IMC Censorship
James Venables | 27.09.2003 18:03
Interesting though it was to be given this link to discussion on how articles get hidden, I can only conclude that articles get hidden on the basis of crass one-line reasoning which is neither tested nor questioned for bigotry or spurious intent of it's own.
http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-uk-features/2003-May/003819.html
![](/img/extlink.gif)
Below is the link to a set of articles, & their attached discussions, which are now being systemically hidden by people who are neither making an effort to justify their behaviour beyond crass one-liners (within which can be hidden all manner of spurious reasoning) or have neither the basic manners to have an online & adult discussion.
http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2003/09/278006.html
PS: No, I'm not RAM.
![](/img/extlink.gif)
PS: No, I'm not RAM.
James Venables
Comments
Hide the following 3 comments
'Aim Here' Is Not Fit To Moderate IMC
27.09.2003 18:34
I myself write the highly successful Bristol-Stop-The-War Newsletter, as well as moderate Direct Action Against War, Bristol Activists & UWE Stop The War.
So, from one moderator to another, 'Aim Here' leave now.
James Venables
purpose of newswire
27.09.2003 19:36
This newswire is NOT designed to provide a medium for unrestricted free speech. There are plenty of places on the internet where such a medium exists, try usenet for example.
Also, this is NOT a discussion forum, there are plenty of politcally oriented forums on the net, and disussion of Indymedia processes takes place on the public imc-process list, which is linked to on the contact page.
james
Actually
27.09.2003 21:40
Z