Postie strike off - What does this mean?
anarchist workers network | 19.09.2003 00:28 | Social Struggles | Workers' Movements
Last week postal workers, members of the CWU, voted by the narrowest majority against national action against Royal Mail’s plan to slash 30,000 jobs in the next nine months. The result took everyone by surprise. Union officials had been confident of a substantial yes vote. It didn’t materialise...
This result is a set back for the left. Anarchists had welcomed the recent upsurge in industrial militancy detecting willingness amongst workers to stand up to bosses. Postal workers have a good record of industrial militancy so it is worth considering what went wrong.
This result is a set back for the left. Anarchists had welcomed the recent upsurge in industrial militancy detecting willingness amongst workers to stand up to bosses. Postal workers have a good record of industrial militancy so it is worth considering what went wrong.
Last week postal workers, members of the CWU, voted by the narrowest majority against national action against Royal Mail’s plan to slash 30,000 jobs in the next nine months. The result took everyone by surprise. Union officials had been confident of a substantial yes vote. It didn’t materialise. An embarrassed Billy Hayes, CWU general secretary slipped out of the union’s Wimbledon head quarters by the back door rather than face the media when the result was announced. Reporters had to quickly rewrite their stories.
This result is a set back for the left. Anarchists had welcomed the recent upsurge in industrial militancy detecting willingness amongst workers to stand up to bosses. Postal workers have a good record of industrial militancy so it is worth considering what went wrong.
The CWU underestimated how hard the company would try to scupper the ballot. Royal Mail’s boss, Allan Leighton, wrote a stream of letters to the company’s workers. One union activist joked that he gets more letters from Leighton than his family! Leighton’s letters were full of dire warnings. If you strike, he wrote, “we begin the process of commercial suicide”. Royal Mail claimed that the company was making losses of £611 million. This gave the impression that it was on the verge of collapse scaring workers to vote no. Trouble was it is a lie.
The bosses’ paper the Financial Times pointed out last week that “Royal Mail expects to make an operating profit of £100 million this year and £320 million next”.
Royal Mail claim that job cuts are needed to make the company profitable, yet they are scheduled to make £320 million next year. It looks like workers will be paying with their jobs for even higher profits!
There is no doubt that postal workers were fearful because of Royal Mail’s exaggerated losses that jobs would be at risk if they went on strike. They were also fearful that if they went on strike the government would speed up the planned privatisation of postal services. CWU members knew that the government would, like in the fire fighters’ dispute back the employer to the hilt. Threats of bringing forward deregualtion showed that government taking sides right from the start. As anarchists know the state is not neutral in industrial disputes. The laws the state passes, the money it spends, its police force all stack the odds against workers.
Low pay also played a part. Postal workers earn a basic £260 a week. “Its very difficult” one postal worker said, “you are constantly watching what you spend” Strike action would have cost workers £50 to £60 a day. Money they could ill afford. It is a scandal that while the CWU hand over thousands and thousands of pounds to the Labour Party they do not have the funds to support their members when they plan to go on strike.
This shows the importance of anarchist calls for rank and file union members to get their unions to stop handing members money over to Labour. Tony Blair has shown again and again that he is the friend of business not the workers. Unions need to break with Labour.
The ballot result was also a set back for the union’s left-wing deputy general secretary Dave Ward whom this year ousted moderate John Keggie. There is disillusionment within the union about its leaders. Members have suffered years of low pay. The last national dispute seven years made no difference to their lot. “It has gone round in a circle” one CWU member said “different people at the top but the same rubbish”.
Although Allan Leighton cooed that the result was “a victory for the company” he might not get things all his way. Despite the threats the vote ballot was close: 48,038 to 46,391 against. There is talk of wildcat action. In London 11,417 postal workers voted for action against Royal Mail’s offer on London Weighting compared to 4,316 against. A London wide dispute is now likely.
This result is a set back for the left. Anarchists had welcomed the recent upsurge in industrial militancy detecting willingness amongst workers to stand up to bosses. Postal workers have a good record of industrial militancy so it is worth considering what went wrong.
The CWU underestimated how hard the company would try to scupper the ballot. Royal Mail’s boss, Allan Leighton, wrote a stream of letters to the company’s workers. One union activist joked that he gets more letters from Leighton than his family! Leighton’s letters were full of dire warnings. If you strike, he wrote, “we begin the process of commercial suicide”. Royal Mail claimed that the company was making losses of £611 million. This gave the impression that it was on the verge of collapse scaring workers to vote no. Trouble was it is a lie.
The bosses’ paper the Financial Times pointed out last week that “Royal Mail expects to make an operating profit of £100 million this year and £320 million next”.
Royal Mail claim that job cuts are needed to make the company profitable, yet they are scheduled to make £320 million next year. It looks like workers will be paying with their jobs for even higher profits!
There is no doubt that postal workers were fearful because of Royal Mail’s exaggerated losses that jobs would be at risk if they went on strike. They were also fearful that if they went on strike the government would speed up the planned privatisation of postal services. CWU members knew that the government would, like in the fire fighters’ dispute back the employer to the hilt. Threats of bringing forward deregualtion showed that government taking sides right from the start. As anarchists know the state is not neutral in industrial disputes. The laws the state passes, the money it spends, its police force all stack the odds against workers.
Low pay also played a part. Postal workers earn a basic £260 a week. “Its very difficult” one postal worker said, “you are constantly watching what you spend” Strike action would have cost workers £50 to £60 a day. Money they could ill afford. It is a scandal that while the CWU hand over thousands and thousands of pounds to the Labour Party they do not have the funds to support their members when they plan to go on strike.
This shows the importance of anarchist calls for rank and file union members to get their unions to stop handing members money over to Labour. Tony Blair has shown again and again that he is the friend of business not the workers. Unions need to break with Labour.
The ballot result was also a set back for the union’s left-wing deputy general secretary Dave Ward whom this year ousted moderate John Keggie. There is disillusionment within the union about its leaders. Members have suffered years of low pay. The last national dispute seven years made no difference to their lot. “It has gone round in a circle” one CWU member said “different people at the top but the same rubbish”.
Although Allan Leighton cooed that the result was “a victory for the company” he might not get things all his way. Despite the threats the vote ballot was close: 48,038 to 46,391 against. There is talk of wildcat action. In London 11,417 postal workers voted for action against Royal Mail’s offer on London Weighting compared to 4,316 against. A London wide dispute is now likely.
anarchist workers network
Homepage:
http://www.awn.org.uk
Comments
Hide the following 13 comments
Work is drudgery.
19.09.2003 00:50
UNEmployAble
People need to become more political.
19.09.2003 06:05
Redkop
have some sense
19.09.2003 09:57
think about it
'realities of the market'
19.09.2003 10:58
'My baby is starving, please give me food'
'Sorry, this spreadsheet clearly shows that it would be unrealistic for me to do that'
kurious
To think abot it??????????????????
19.09.2003 11:04
Redkop
Beyond left-wing obsessed ranting idiot-analysis
19.09.2003 18:04
moving beyond your anti-privatisation fervour, however admirable, your analysis is woefully paper-thin, and frankly, is embarassing. your painful analysis is akin to that of the misguided scribblings of a spotty-nosed idealistically-transfixed sixth-former, no offence.
The facts are that Royal Mail is losing money. They are only due to make profit next year. I agree with everything ThinkAboutIt has said. Shedding 30,000 workers now is better than sacking 100,000 later on. Royal Mail need to keep their monopoly of 1st class mail together, otherwise it will all be contracted out. They won't keep it if they continue to lose money. Enough union members realise Alan Leighton is right about this (though some union members no doubt voted against strike for self-interested reasons apart from that, such as not forgoing 1/2 weeks wages). The bottom-line for any "Public Enterprise" that you dream about in your fantasy of what should happen in an ideal world is that no business can go on losing money! You idiot.
The workers SHOULD have been invested in with more money years ago (their basic pay rate), but let me tell you, as someone who used to work for Royal Mail, I saw with my own eyes the reasons how and why Royal Mail lost money in the past - paying ridiculous overtime rates to workers (for posties doing say 3 hrs extra work doing a extra delivery for someone who was off sick, they'dd successfully claim equivalent to one shift's worktime i.e. 9 hrs... so if they'dd do 2 deliveries overtime, they'dd get 18hrs!!!) That arrangement was removed as working practice was changed in accordance with the "Way Forward" contract which the union signed up to 4 years ago.
Waltzing Matilda
Try a different waltz Matilda.
19.09.2003 19:17
Redkop
Kop-out from logic and reason
19.09.2003 21:04
Yes, it is abit much for the workers to have to put up with the wage they are getting for a while longer, but the management have been up front and honest about the situation (unlike how they were before), and have successfully earned trust and respect from workers and to a degree pulled people together. The majority of union members voting in the way they did surely tells you something, that the situation is not as cut-and-dry as you suggest. If anyone needs pressure exerted on it is the regulator, holding back on increasing the price of the costs of 1st and 2nd class mail for as long as they have done, and limiting the time over which Royal Mail can increase the cost again in future.
So, RedKnob, take in the entirity of the picture before making broad-brush claims and making claims about my politics. I AM NOT A PRIVATE-MANAGEMENT STOOGE, just a realist. You, instead, judge the entire situation with the same limited tools of analysis, that anything steered by a management-operational level is unsatisfactory, which is fundamentally dishonest.
Your analysis belongs with the SWP.
Waltzing Matilda
You avoid my original question.Matilda.
20.09.2003 08:34
Redkop
Red-Kop needs a dose of reality
20.09.2003 09:26
- so, what better course could be steered than what they (the management) are doing now to avoid privatisation which the regulator and the rest of the private sector would like to see happen? If the business/public enterprise don't break-even, then no business/public enterprise in future. AGAIN, you completely avoid the bare facts of what is actually happening with Royal Mail at the moment, and fly off into your ivory-tower holier-than-now anarcho-syndicalist-obsessional fantasy-at-the exclusion-of everything-else mentality. I happen to believe in Anarcho-Syndicalism, but like many anarchos/marxists/swp idiots out there, you quote the past without bearing down on all of the facts of what is happening in the present. Really, say something substantial or don't say anything at-all!
I do accept that workers in London should strike if they don't get a fairer deal on London weighting. London posties have always been in a different boat to the rest.
Waltzing Matilda
The need for workers control.
20.09.2003 10:06
Redkop
truth is..
24.09.2003 13:26
(Now duck the flames, they won't like me saying that!)
kurious
Red Kop
19.03.2009 18:50
Workers' control needed indeed.
Waltzing Matilda