Skip to content or view screen version

Postie strike off - What does this mean?

anarchist workers network | 19.09.2003 00:28 | Social Struggles | Workers' Movements

Last week postal workers, members of the CWU, voted by the narrowest majority against national action against Royal Mail’s plan to slash 30,000 jobs in the next nine months. The result took everyone by surprise. Union officials had been confident of a substantial yes vote. It didn’t materialise...

This result is a set back for the left. Anarchists had welcomed the recent upsurge in industrial militancy detecting willingness amongst workers to stand up to bosses. Postal workers have a good record of industrial militancy so it is worth considering what went wrong.

Last week postal workers, members of the CWU, voted by the narrowest majority against national action against Royal Mail’s plan to slash 30,000 jobs in the next nine months. The result took everyone by surprise. Union officials had been confident of a substantial yes vote. It didn’t materialise. An embarrassed Billy Hayes, CWU general secretary slipped out of the union’s Wimbledon head quarters by the back door rather than face the media when the result was announced. Reporters had to quickly rewrite their stories.

This result is a set back for the left. Anarchists had welcomed the recent upsurge in industrial militancy detecting willingness amongst workers to stand up to bosses. Postal workers have a good record of industrial militancy so it is worth considering what went wrong.

The CWU underestimated how hard the company would try to scupper the ballot. Royal Mail’s boss, Allan Leighton, wrote a stream of letters to the company’s workers. One union activist joked that he gets more letters from Leighton than his family! Leighton’s letters were full of dire warnings. If you strike, he wrote, “we begin the process of commercial suicide”. Royal Mail claimed that the company was making losses of £611 million. This gave the impression that it was on the verge of collapse scaring workers to vote no. Trouble was it is a lie.

The bosses’ paper the Financial Times pointed out last week that “Royal Mail expects to make an operating profit of £100 million this year and £320 million next”.

Royal Mail claim that job cuts are needed to make the company profitable, yet they are scheduled to make £320 million next year. It looks like workers will be paying with their jobs for even higher profits!

There is no doubt that postal workers were fearful because of Royal Mail’s exaggerated losses that jobs would be at risk if they went on strike. They were also fearful that if they went on strike the government would speed up the planned privatisation of postal services. CWU members knew that the government would, like in the fire fighters’ dispute back the employer to the hilt. Threats of bringing forward deregualtion showed that government taking sides right from the start. As anarchists know the state is not neutral in industrial disputes. The laws the state passes, the money it spends, its police force all stack the odds against workers.

Low pay also played a part. Postal workers earn a basic £260 a week. “Its very difficult” one postal worker said, “you are constantly watching what you spend” Strike action would have cost workers £50 to £60 a day. Money they could ill afford. It is a scandal that while the CWU hand over thousands and thousands of pounds to the Labour Party they do not have the funds to support their members when they plan to go on strike.

This shows the importance of anarchist calls for rank and file union members to get their unions to stop handing members money over to Labour. Tony Blair has shown again and again that he is the friend of business not the workers. Unions need to break with Labour.

The ballot result was also a set back for the union’s left-wing deputy general secretary Dave Ward whom this year ousted moderate John Keggie. There is disillusionment within the union about its leaders. Members have suffered years of low pay. The last national dispute seven years made no difference to their lot. “It has gone round in a circle” one CWU member said “different people at the top but the same rubbish”.

Although Allan Leighton cooed that the result was “a victory for the company” he might not get things all his way. Despite the threats the vote ballot was close: 48,038 to 46,391 against. There is talk of wildcat action. In London 11,417 postal workers voted for action against Royal Mail’s offer on London Weighting compared to 4,316 against. A London wide dispute is now likely.

anarchist workers network
- Homepage: http://www.awn.org.uk

Comments

Hide the following 13 comments

Work is drudgery.

19.09.2003 00:50

..It means some poor sod will hsve to trudge round at dawn and deliver your bills from the people who capitalise on our lives plus deliver other mindless crap and get payed three pieces of eight for their labors.

UNEmployAble


People need to become more political.

19.09.2003 06:05

Its no good just blaming union leadership for the postal workers plight.The right wing leadership need to be dumped by the rank and file membership.This requires people to become much more political and involved in their unions activities.And quite honestly i cannot see this happening in the UK.Most people are only interested in their own little world of home, car ,and gardening.Consumerism being their main reason for living, i only have to look around my own neigbourhood to understand the problem.People are programmed to shop and spend without this their lives become meaningless.Getting political and involved and educated just gets in the way of doing the gardening and washing the car.What is to be done?

Redkop


have some sense

19.09.2003 09:57

If they had gone on strike then the Govt would have removed all the remaining monopolies on small items that Royal Mail has, other companies would have cashed in, and far more than 30,000 jobs would be lost in the long run. Thats why. Unions wrecked British Leyland and made it go bust so I think it's better to loose 30,000 than 100,000 or even more jobs when Royal Mail goes down the drain thanks to the realities of the market and its militant workforce trying to sink the ship they're sailing on!

think about it


'realities of the market'

19.09.2003 10:58

Ever noticed how 'market realities' and 'economic realities' are somehow more real than, like, having to eat or having a roof over your head?

'My baby is starving, please give me food'
'Sorry, this spreadsheet clearly shows that it would be unrealistic for me to do that'

kurious


To think abot it??????????????????

19.09.2003 11:04

Think about it needs to think about what they are saying and open up their minds more to reality.Public bodies and utilities are potentialy far more democratic and socialy aware institutions than corrupt so called 'free-market' enterprises.Although at present the postal service is being slimmed down to make it more appealing to selfish private corporations,potentialy it could be made into a service that offers a good source of employment with a real living wage for its employees,and give a first class postal service in return.However the funding needs and political will required for this does not exsist in the UK PLC, attitude of so called 'free-market' Britain.What think about it must learn is that human-beings are simply not economic entities devoid of emotions, they require a happy and secure work enviroment.Given these a work force becomes more content and good-will developes towards their source of employment.Private capital fails to provide neither secure work or a fair living wage.Profits are the only motive of private capital and the so called free-market, thus the people are only their to serve the economy and the rich corporate 'fatcats'.In reality the economy is only in exsistance to serve humanity and not the other way around.I fully understand that to fulfill these ideas a complete change in political economy needs to happen, however this is not impossible but with people like 'think about it'and thier reactionary ideas i sometimes despair any change is possible.

Redkop


Beyond left-wing obsessed ranting idiot-analysis

19.09.2003 18:04

Back in the real world, Redkopp...
moving beyond your anti-privatisation fervour, however admirable, your analysis is woefully paper-thin, and frankly, is embarassing. your painful analysis is akin to that of the misguided scribblings of a spotty-nosed idealistically-transfixed sixth-former, no offence.
The facts are that Royal Mail is losing money. They are only due to make profit next year. I agree with everything ThinkAboutIt has said. Shedding 30,000 workers now is better than sacking 100,000 later on. Royal Mail need to keep their monopoly of 1st class mail together, otherwise it will all be contracted out. They won't keep it if they continue to lose money. Enough union members realise Alan Leighton is right about this (though some union members no doubt voted against strike for self-interested reasons apart from that, such as not forgoing 1/2 weeks wages). The bottom-line for any "Public Enterprise" that you dream about in your fantasy of what should happen in an ideal world is that no business can go on losing money! You idiot.

The workers SHOULD have been invested in with more money years ago (their basic pay rate), but let me tell you, as someone who used to work for Royal Mail, I saw with my own eyes the reasons how and why Royal Mail lost money in the past - paying ridiculous overtime rates to workers (for posties doing say 3 hrs extra work doing a extra delivery for someone who was off sick, they'dd successfully claim equivalent to one shift's worktime i.e. 9 hrs... so if they'dd do 2 deliveries overtime, they'dd get 18hrs!!!) That arrangement was removed as working practice was changed in accordance with the "Way Forward" contract which the union signed up to 4 years ago.

Waltzing Matilda


Try a different waltz Matilda.

19.09.2003 19:17

You are obviously a closed minded capitalist apoligiser Matilda.The fatcat postal bosses are soon to take over from so called over paid postal workers.Anyone that works unsocial hours should be rewarded generously.Ispeak not as a spotty six former but ex health service qualified nurse so i know what i talk about when discussing the PUBLIC SERVICES.Note the bold PUBLIC SERVICE this is something you obviously hate.From my time working in the Health Service i know full well the horrific consequencies of private medicine.When something goes wrong in private hospitals the Health Service always steps in to put things right at the publics expence.To save a lot more hot air i only need say privitization kills, and public services are more caring and humane.

Redkop


Kop-out from logic and reason

19.09.2003 21:04

yes, privatisation is an entirely undesirable turn of events in the Health Service, as it is in schools, and as it has already been with rail, water, and many more that are too numerous to mention. But, you foolishly avoid the substance of argument put towards you, that what is currently happening in the postal service is entiely different. The service is not even breaking-even at the moment, and so is an entirely unsustainable state of affairs. Yes, there are hoops being put in place to set this all up for privatisation by the regulator, but that could be avoided if Royal Mail succeeds in breaking even in future. It means getting rid of the unnecessary second delivery, and, losing some jobs in the process. Otherwise, if it can't prove it is a sustainable concern with taxpayers money, then the vultures will be in to pick the best parts of the rotting carcass.

Yes, it is abit much for the workers to have to put up with the wage they are getting for a while longer, but the management have been up front and honest about the situation (unlike how they were before), and have successfully earned trust and respect from workers and to a degree pulled people together. The majority of union members voting in the way they did surely tells you something, that the situation is not as cut-and-dry as you suggest. If anyone needs pressure exerted on it is the regulator, holding back on increasing the price of the costs of 1st and 2nd class mail for as long as they have done, and limiting the time over which Royal Mail can increase the cost again in future.

So, RedKnob, take in the entirity of the picture before making broad-brush claims and making claims about my politics. I AM NOT A PRIVATE-MANAGEMENT STOOGE, just a realist. You, instead, judge the entire situation with the same limited tools of analysis, that anything steered by a management-operational level is unsatisfactory, which is fundamentally dishonest.

Your analysis belongs with the SWP.

Waltzing Matilda


You avoid my original question.Matilda.

20.09.2003 08:34

All workers should become more political and take over the running of thier unions.This is the true meaning of my original statement Waltzing Matilda.It is simply no good looking out for the best option at the present time workers must take control of their employment.All management is only put into place to exploit the working person.The Workers Soviets in 1917 were a true example of worker democracy in action prior to the Stalin dictatorship that followed them.Icannot understand why you are so content with just 'putting ' up with things as they are at present.You clearly are just someone is content to accept what is at present happening, and that Matilda is what divides us on this issue.Ps i do not and have never belonged to the SWP.Wrong again Matilda.

Redkop


Red-Kop needs a dose of reality

20.09.2003 09:26

you said: "workers should become more political and take over the running of thier unions.This is the true meaning of my original statement Waltzing Matilda.It is simply no good looking out for the best option at the present time workers must take control of their employment".

- so, what better course could be steered than what they (the management) are doing now to avoid privatisation which the regulator and the rest of the private sector would like to see happen? If the business/public enterprise don't break-even, then no business/public enterprise in future. AGAIN, you completely avoid the bare facts of what is actually happening with Royal Mail at the moment, and fly off into your ivory-tower holier-than-now anarcho-syndicalist-obsessional fantasy-at-the exclusion-of everything-else mentality. I happen to believe in Anarcho-Syndicalism, but like many anarchos/marxists/swp idiots out there, you quote the past without bearing down on all of the facts of what is happening in the present. Really, say something substantial or don't say anything at-all!

I do accept that workers in London should strike if they don't get a fairer deal on London weighting. London posties have always been in a different boat to the rest.

Waltzing Matilda


The need for workers control.

20.09.2003 10:06

Now,now,Matida calm down.The crux of my argument is that nobody can LEAD the working people of this country or any other country for that matter.It is up to the workers to take control.What is wrong with this i do not see why you are so antagonistic to my original pint.Blair and his so called New Labour party are no allies to working people.They do not represent anyone except the corporate bosses.By the way did you notice the headline about the Oxford postal workers unofficial strike good luck to them.From small acorns large oak trees grow! Matilda you need to become more open minded and politicaly involved.Once more i do not belong and have never belonged to the SWP.

Redkop


truth is..

24.09.2003 13:26

Most folk on here agree with the SWP more than they disagree.

(Now duck the flames, they won't like me saying that!)

kurious


Red Kop

19.03.2009 18:50

Just re-visited this 5 and a half years on. well, Red Kop was right wasn't he. Big business agent Mandleson is steering through part-privatisation and the Cowley Rd PO depot, who had the wildcat strike in 2003 are being shut down!

Workers' control needed indeed.

Waltzing Matilda