Skip to content or view screen version

Iraq did have weapons of mass destruction after all!

Rockwell | 18.09.2003 15:06

Here is a report from the CIA the most advanced secret intellegence service in the world published in October 2002 which proves that Iraq really did have weapons of mass destruction before the recent war on Iraq in March!

Iraq has continued its weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs in defiance of UN resolutions and restrictions. Baghdad has chemical and biological weapons as well as missiles with ranges in excess of UN restrictions; if left unchecked, it probably will have a nuclear weapon during this decade.

Baghdad hides large portions of Iraq's WMD efforts. Revelations after the Gulf war starkly demonstrate the extensive efforts undertaken by Iraq to deny information. Since inspections ended in 1998, Iraq has maintained its chemical weapons effort, energized its missile program, and invested more heavily in biological weapons; most analysts assess Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear weapons program.

Iraq's growing ability to sell oil illicitly increases Baghdad's capabilities to finance WMD programs; annual earnings in cash and goods have more than quadrupled. Iraq largely has rebuilt missile and biological weapons facilities damaged during Operation Desert Fox and has expanded its chemical and biological infrastructure under the cover of civilian production.

Baghdad has exceeded UN range limits of 150 km with its ballistic missiles and is working with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), which allow for a more lethal means to deliver biological and, less likely, chemical warfare agents. Although Saddam probably does not yet have nuclear weapons or sufficient material to make any, he remains intent on acquiring them. How quickly Iraq will obtain its first nuclear weapon depends on when it acquires sufficient weapons-grade fissile material.

If Baghdad acquires sufficient weapons-grade fissile material from abroad, it could make a nuclear weapon within a year. Without such material from abroad, Iraq probably would not be able to make a weapon until the last half of the decade.

Iraq's aggressive attempts to obtain proscribed high-strength aluminum tubes are of significant concern. All intelligence experts agree that Iraq is seeking nuclear weapons and that these tubes could be used in a centrifuge enrichment program. Most intelligence specialists assess this to be the intended use, but some believe that these tubes are probably intended for conventional weapons programs.

Based on tubes of the size Iraq is trying to acquire, a few tens of thousands of centrifuges would be capable of producing enough highly enriched uranium for a couple of weapons per year. Baghdad has begun renewed production of chemical warfare agents, probably including mustard, sarin, cyclosarin, and VX. Its capability was reduced during the UNSCOM inspections and is probably more limited now than it was at the time of the Gulf war, although VX production and agent storage life probably have been improved.

Saddam probably has stocked a few hundred metric tons of CW agents. The Iraqis have experience in manufacturing CW bombs, artillery rockets, and projectiles, and probably possess CW bulk fills for SRBM warheads, including for a limited number of covertly stored, extended-range Scuds. All key aspects—R&D, production, and weaponization—of Iraq's offensive BW program are active and most elements are larger and more advanced than they were before the Gulf war.

Iraq has some lethal and incapacitating BW agents and is capable of quickly producing and weaponizing a variety of such agents, including anthrax, for delivery by bombs, missiles, aerial sprayers, and covert operatives, including potentially against the US Homeland.

Baghdad has established a large-scale, redundant, and concealed BW agent production capability, which includes mobile facilities; these facilities can evade detection, are highly survivable, and can exceed the production rates Iraq had prior to the Gulf war.
Iraq maintains a small missile force and several development programs, including for a UAV that most analysts believe probably is intended to deliver biological warfare agents.

Gaps in Iraqi accounting to UNSCOM suggest that Saddam retains a covert force of up to a few dozen Scud-variant SRBMs with ranges of 650 to 900 km. Iraq is deploying its new al-Samoud and Ababil-100 SRBMs, which are capable of flying beyond the UN-authorized 150-km range limit.

Baghdad's UAVs—especially if used for delivery of chemical and biological warfare (CBW) agents—could threaten Iraq's neighbors, US forces in the Persian Gulf, and the United States if brought close to, or into, the US Homeland. Iraq is developing medium-range ballistic missile capabilities, largely through foreign assistance in building specialized facilities.

Rockwell
- Homepage: http://www.fas.org/irp/cia/product/Iraq_Oct_2002.htm

Comments

Hide the following 5 comments

Funny That

18.09.2003 15:23

All this info, but they couldn't direct any weapons inspector to find one shread of evidence. Oh but its the CIA, thats OK, must be right, God bless Amerika.

sqee


Well, if the CIA said they did they must have...

18.09.2003 15:24

Only joking!!

LOL

Amerosceptic


sort of

18.09.2003 15:29

you might want to take note of the use of the following words in the article:

might
could
small
if

and so on ... happy hunting!

picky


Stoppit Rockwell - its too funny!!!

18.09.2003 15:51

"CIA the most advanced secret intellegence service in the world"

!!!!!!!!!

That'll be the most advanced supplier of lies and misinformation in the world then.

Bloody hell, Rockers, you big corporate patsy, "intelligence services" EXIST to lie!

You can't go around believing a word they say! It's just not rational!

FYI, the CIA has also trained and funded Osama bin Laden, helped overthrow democratically-elected governments in Chile, Nicaragua and south east Asia, tried to assassinate democratically-elected leaders more times than they can probably remember and, in order to avoid Congressional bans on funding, has set up one of the world's largest cocaine trafficking networks. [None of this is paranoid conspiracy theory, this is all from US Congressional investigations]

Personally I'd trust the CIA about as far as I could comfortably spit out a rat.

Or about as far as I'd trust the ability of Rockwell to have an independent thought.

Mad Monk


This is old, old 'intelligence'

18.09.2003 21:05

The 'evidence' in this posting was all produced before the war, it is not new evidence acquired since US inspection teams have had the free run of Iraq. Lets look at the evidence...

"Baghdad has chemical and biological weapons as well as missiles with ranges in excess of UN restrictions; if left unchecked, it probably will have a nuclear weapon during this decade."

No evidence has been produced for the existence of any biological or chemical weapons stocks. The 'missing' weapons in Hans Blix's reports were simply *not accounted for*. This meant that as well as Saddam sitting on a pile of anthrax (some of which might have been discovered after more than 4 months of searching) it was eminently possible that they may not exist. They may have been destroyed in 1991 after Gulf War 1 and the destruction not properly documented (if you saw Dan Cruickshank's report on the Iraqi Museum, you will have seen that cataloguing things was not something the Ba'ath regime always did very well), or they may have turned to mush in the intervening years.

"If Baghdad acquires sufficient weapons-grade fissile material from abroad, it could make a nuclear weapon within a year. Without such material from abroad, Iraq probably would not be able to make a weapon until the last half of the decade"

Nuclear weapons, eh? But this is based on the assumption that fissile material will be readily accessible (not after Israel bombed the reactor in the early 80s) and that Saddam will face no obstacles i.e. no inspections. This is not very likely. The 'evidence' that Iraq was trying to buy uranium ore from Niger was forged. The 'evidence' of the aluminium tubes supposedly for centrifuging was also wrong - those tubes were not suitable for a high-speed centrifuge.

"Baghdad has exceeded UN range limits of 150 km with its ballistic missiles and is working with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), which allow for a more lethal means to deliver biological and, less likely, chemical warfare agents".

The missiles only exceeded the range because they had been lightened by the removal of the guidance system during tests. They only flew a few kilometres over the limit, offering no real threat to any other country. At the time that war began, Iraq had begun destroying those missiles, as acknowledged by Hans Blix. The UAVs are a joke. They are big radio-controlled aircraft used for recon missions, one was shown to journalists just before the war. There was no evidence that they could be or were fitted to release any weapons. US drones, on the other hand, can fire Hellfire missiles. Both these claims were desperate red herrings that sadly did convince some people.

Note that Iraq did not use any Scuds in the conflict. Note that no 'mobile labs' have been found (those found were actually for refuelling hydrogen balloons). Note that no chemical or biological weapons were used in the conflict. If you look at all the evidence, it is obvious that the issue of Iraqi weapons was not one which could justify war. But under international law, it was the only issue which could justify war. Hence, lies, forgeries and exaggeration.

Matt