Skip to content or view screen version

Stop GM crop commercialisation join the Green Gloves pledge

Green Gloves | 06.08.2003 15:07 | Bio-technology | Ecology

Join the Green Gloves pledge to stop the commercial growing of GM crops in the UK

Stop GM Growing Join the Green Gloves Pledge

"This is Iraq Mark 2: there is no supporting evidence … the public don't like it and the Government seems determined to overrule all opposition."
(Former Environment Minister Michael Meacher on GM Crops)

After five years of massive public opposition to GM and a nationwide public debate, Tony Blair will decide in October whether to allow commercial growing of GM crops.

There's every indication that he'll ignore the results of the public debate and even the advice of his own economic advisors. Planting could begin as early as spring next year, contaminating our countryside with GM. That would please a handful of powerful corporations and the US government but bulldoze democracy.

If Tony Blair gives the green light for GM, then a nation of gardeners will put on their gardening gloves, take GM crops out of the ground and make sure that the people have the last word on protecting our future.

You are invited to join with others who have signed the Green Gloves Pledge, below. This is a pledge to take, or support others who take, non-violent action to prevent genetic pollution and its damage to life and livelihoods. You will be acting in the public interest with the support of many others. The number of people signing the pledge will indicate to the government how many people are willing to actively defend nature and democracy. It will remind Tony Blair where real power finally lies: with the will of the people. Perhaps, just perhaps, he might even listen.

Some facts

* Only 14% of the British public support GM food (MORI, June 2003)
* All UK supermarkets have told the government they will not use GM foods in the foreseeable future
* The government’s own economic review concluded that there was no benefit in the near future from growing GM crops and that organic and non-GM crops would be threatened.
* The head of the committee overseeing the government's public debate on GM, involving over 20,000 people, reported that the results are overwhelmingly against GM commercialisation.
* Only 4 countries worldwide grow 99% of all GM crops: the US, Canada, Argentina and China. GM farmers there are seeing problems.
* In New Zealand over 3000 people signed a similar Green Gloves Pledge in 12 weeks. New Zealand currently has an official moratorium on growing GM crops, as do increasing numbers of countries around the world


The Green Gloves Pledge

If the UK government gives the go-ahead to commercialise the growing of GM crops against the overwhelming wishes of the British public, I pledge to non-violently remove GM crops from the ground or support those who take action to remove GM crops

I am signing this pledge because



Name



Address



Postcode



Telephone



Email







Note: Your details will be stored securely and not published (Data Protection Act). They are submitted by unencrypted email to Green Gloves.

You can also join the Green Gloves in these other ways:

* Print out the Pledge from the A4 leaflet and send by post to: Green Gloves, 16B Cherwell Street, Oxford, OX4 1BG
* Email your name, address and postcode to :  pledge@greengloves.org
* Send the following text/SMS message:

EMAIL  pledge@greengloves.org I will join the green gloves pledge

to: 00 3933 3477 4753 (text message only)



Website last updated on 4 August 2003

Green Gloves
- e-mail: pledge@greengloves.org
- Homepage: http://www.greengloves.org

Comments

Hide the following 5 comments

I made it

06.08.2003 21:43

Yes, making the pledge exposes you, but if you're worth your salt they'll know about you anyway - and one which must be followed through as required
Now where's that neat little Indy video of a GM field being razed by a group of committed individuals within 20 minutes?

dh


GM Promise

07.08.2003 10:31

Whilst aware of the possible dangers posed by GM technoliges and the current state of this technoliges ownership (multinationals and their 'terminator gene') surely rather then an outright ban on this technology a cautious investigative approach would be better suited (dare i say it, an approach roughly being followed by the current government). The benefits are so huge i wont even go into them, you can use your imagiantion to see the potentinal health benefits to the public and to the the effectiveness of our farms.

While yes it could all go horribly wrong, and as with most wierd and wonderful technologies the public as yet dont trust it, we should not close the door on this technology as yet. It could help bring about countless benefits that the left would otherwise fight to the bitter end for! disease? malnutrition? hunger? they could all be severly reduced worldwide if only this technology was embraced and used effectively across of the globe.

karic


Nieve

07.08.2003 11:36

What astounding benefits are these?

Did you hear the one about the Monsanto employee who was paid to publish pro-GM articles on the web? (maybe you should apply for a job)

Feed the poor blah blah (we have enough food already it's the distribution that's the problem)

Cure all diseases blah blah (we get old and die beacuse we are programed that way by our genes- give up the immortality dream)

Natural selection and evolution rest on a basic premise - genetic diversity, GM fiddling massively reduces genetic diversity- nuff said?

Mayler


Darwin

08.08.2003 10:27

Why wait for evolution? And i'm not proposing that before we start planting GM crops we uproot all natural wildlife first. If it were controlled i see no problems in having a little green house set aside some where that grows GM crops which contain high portions of protein or some such other nutrient that can be given to a population in desperate need.

As yet the benefits cannot be seen (only in multinationals profit margins) but thats since they own the patents to all the specific variants and refuse to let, say African farmers use their crop unless they pay rediculous prices for it. So yes your rigt, distribtuion is the problem, the technology however, if not purposely used to erradicate bio diversity can have huge benefits.

And whats so wrong with PR? The corporations were surely forced into publicisng the benefits of the technology after a million and one greens jumped on the band wagon of public mistrust.

karic


Biology A level

08.08.2003 14:39

Why wait for evolution?
- because it is a process that we really do not understand and the future of our survival depends on us not messing it up.


And i'm not proposing that before we start planting GM crops we uproot all natural wildlife first.
- If you grow it outside then there will inevitably be cross contamination- and there is no going back once that happens.

If it were controlled i see no problems in having a little green house set aside some where that grows GM crops which contain high portions of protein or some such other nutrient that can be given to a population in desperate need. -
- A little greenhouse to feed Africa? As I said before we already have more than enough food it is the systemic failure to distribute it to people in need that is the problem.

As yet the benefits cannot be seen (only in multinationals profit margins) but thats since they own the patents to all the specific variants and refuse to let, say African farmers use their crop unless they pay rediculous prices for it. So yes your rigt, distribtuion is the problem, the technology however, if not purposely used to erradicate bio diversity can have huge benefits.
-The point rather is that this technology hands control of our food production into the hands of the powerful and the rich, there will be no GM controled by poor peasant farmers as they dont have the capital to set up the processes. (and even if they did have the cash i would hope that they would have more sense, as they have a more direct understanding of our dependence on nature)
GM IS deliberately reducing biodiversity- that's the whole deal- that's what the process is, to control the genetic code and have a 'few' favoured strains of food plant, the problem is when a pest develops (evolution remember) that kills that 'favoured variety' it will kill each and every plant(no diversity see)and we will have the worldwide equivalent of the Irish Potato famine.

And whats so wrong with PR? The corporations were surely forced into publicisng the benefits of the technology after a million and one greens jumped on the band wagon of public mistrust.
- what's wrong with the greens exposing the cross contamination, lower yields, inreased pesticide use (roundup is a much more potent pesticide than is usually used) and some disturbing health effects on mice fed GM (they died)
They have virtually no resources compared to the biotech companies and yet (as you admit) we are still winning the arguement!

Mayler