PMOS: As a technical expert, (....) was not a senior intelligence officer::yeah?
ram | 18.07.2003 22:03 | Analysis | Anti-militarism | Repression
Checkout the links
Both sources are known liars but as the stories are dated there are some valuable clues left behind.
Why would the PMOS take pain to point out that someone is not an intelligence officer, when it is very clear the 'man burning in hell' was involved/dealing wih the mossad?
Did they trust the BBC will do a good job of distracting the gulible so well?
Both sources are known liars but as the stories are dated there are some valuable clues left behind.
Why would the PMOS take pain to point out that someone is not an intelligence officer, when it is very clear the 'man burning in hell' was involved/dealing wih the mossad?
Did they trust the BBC will do a good job of distracting the gulible so well?

'
15/07/2003 15:30
print this page
home > newsroom > media centre > government press briefings
PRESS BRIEFING: 11AM TUESDAY 15 JULY 2003
....(lot of bullshit)...
IRAQ/BBC
....(more usual bullshit)...
And did they continue to believe that their source was a senior intelligence source? As a technical expert, it was clear that Dr Kelly was not a senior intelligence source.
'
---------------------
Oh yeah?
Just check this out....
---------------------

'
Why Iraq inspections won't work
September 13 2002
Ordering UN weapons inspectors back to Iraq is doomed to failure, writes BBC reporter Tom Mangold.......
....
In 1995, David Kelly, then the senior British UNSCOM inspector, met an Israeli intelligence officer in a safe apartment on First Avenue and 38th Street in New York. The Israeli handed over documents proving that British and German companies had exported 32 tonnes of growth medium for bacteria to the Iraqis
....
'
---------------------
So the pig meets the mossad donkey but keeps the documents from reaching the UN.
Of course the mossad always deals with technical advisors of the MoD.
I say stick the Iraq dossier bullshit up the bitch and get real.
ram
Comments
Display the following 3 comments