NEW VOTING MACHINE EXPECTED TO EXCEED ACCURACY OF ALL OTHER METHODS
Albert Kada | 15.07.2003 08:41 | Education | Technology | London | World
A disgruntled mentally ill voter from TX has designed a voting machine that is expected to exceed the accuracy of all other known methods of ballot tallying currently used. The design was released to the public domain July 13, 2003 and is currently available in it's developmental stage.
Since I am a bipolar schizophrenic journalist, I was able to obtain an interview with the inventor, myself, and stll maintain more integrity than a Diebold public relations expert. If I were trying to be objective I would have bought an advertisement.
"The design is intentionaly simplistic and safe as milk." I said.
"Is there anything wrong with the damn thing?" I asked.
"Perhaps," I replied, "However the time has come for input from other interested parties. Maybe even the reds"
The machine addresses most of the concerns expressed by Bev Harris and David Dill. These very intelligent people have very real concerns. I will give their youarels below.
Low cost customized modular graphics that can be used over and over.
Virtually 100 per cent accuracy, no hanging chad, no mystery boxes, no software, no funny acronyms and complete anonymity.
The community will enjoy using and testing these machines.
The schematics will be completed soon. Developers are encouraged to react.
These machines actually discourage vote rigging.
The only technician that has endorsed this machine is myself, however I am confident that others will soon join in.
My qualifications are noted in the byline below. I am also the first electronic technician in the US to publicly complain about computerized voting machines.
Please see the design at
http://www.io.com/~davecom/voter/index.html but please don't make an acronym out of World Wide War III.
To see how well my competition is doing see especially the top ten ways to rig a voting machine at http://www.blackboxvoting.com and http://www.verifiedvoting.org
by Albert Kada
Independent Terrorist Journalist
Special Agent CIA-A-1
World's only publisher of computer viruses besides Microsoft.
Stolen from the unpublished newspaper "The American Blasphemer" please copy
"The design is intentionaly simplistic and safe as milk." I said.
"Is there anything wrong with the damn thing?" I asked.
"Perhaps," I replied, "However the time has come for input from other interested parties. Maybe even the reds"
The machine addresses most of the concerns expressed by Bev Harris and David Dill. These very intelligent people have very real concerns. I will give their youarels below.
Low cost customized modular graphics that can be used over and over.
Virtually 100 per cent accuracy, no hanging chad, no mystery boxes, no software, no funny acronyms and complete anonymity.
The community will enjoy using and testing these machines.
The schematics will be completed soon. Developers are encouraged to react.
These machines actually discourage vote rigging.
The only technician that has endorsed this machine is myself, however I am confident that others will soon join in.
My qualifications are noted in the byline below. I am also the first electronic technician in the US to publicly complain about computerized voting machines.
Please see the design at
http://www.io.com/~davecom/voter/index.html but please don't make an acronym out of World Wide War III. To see how well my competition is doing see especially the top ten ways to rig a voting machine at
http://www.blackboxvoting.com and http://www.verifiedvoting.org by Albert Kada
Independent Terrorist Journalist
Special Agent CIA-A-1
World's only publisher of computer viruses besides Microsoft.
Stolen from the unpublished newspaper "The American Blasphemer" please copy
Albert Kada
e-mail:
davecom@io.com
Homepage:
http://www.io.com/~davecoom/