Skip to content or view screen version

Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

The Left's hypocritical support of the Palestinians

Dan | 11.06.2003 09:12

The Left's hypocritical support of the Palestinians

 http://jrep.com/Viewpoint/Article-6.html

Arafat and the Palestinian people share responsibility for an attempt to extinguish Jewish statehood and both must pay.
Let’s get things straight. Israel is not engaged in a war to liberate the Palestinians from Arafat and his gang. We are fighting to punish and deter a terror entity that is blowing up our children and sending our economy into a tailspin. Both Arafat and the Palestinian people share responsibility for a premeditated attempt to extinguish Jewish statehood and both must pay for their failed attempt. In this respect the left is correct: Arafat is truly representative of the Palestinian people.

Dan

Comments

Hide the following 6 comments

Sow and Reap

11.06.2003 09:18

As you punish Palestine, remember, vengeance shall be mine, sayeth the Lord.

Gabriel


Sow and reap

11.06.2003 09:51

I'm sure that's what mass murderer Abdel-Aziz al-Rantissi will say when the Israeli army finally catches up with him. Before he is vapourised I hope he has time to reflect on his life of evil, murdering unarmed women and children and scurrying away from the IDF like a rat. Then I hope he dies slowly, suffering in incredible pain.

Now THAT would be REAPING WHAT YOU SOW!

Israeli helicopter gunship


to dan

11.06.2003 09:55

what is this crap.

first of all the notion if that there is some official right for a jewish state is absurd, thats to say if i'm a communist i have a right to demand a communist state, which let me tell you the whitehouse just might not allow.
if i'm a hindu that means i can go on someone elses land, hey why don't i go to the isle of man and demand a hindu state right now!


the hipocrisy is all on the right which deny the murder, the repression, the torture of an innocent people on their land, yes their land.
when a palestinian girl or boy gets killed by an israeli bulldozer, bullet or missile is that not terrorism? what would you call them, those who have been killed by israeli action, what are those children killed in their streets in their schools?what are they to you?

terrorism is terrorism, murder is murder whether it be by a suicide bomber or an israeli tank, its the same.

you go into towns in a tank and fire rockets, they go into towns with RPG's and some attach bombs to their bodies, what is the difference, it is still terrorism.

i'm sceptical about the motives of your posts but nevertheless we have to get something straight with you people;

people are dying, living in effectively camps, prisoners on their own land because of the israeli government, that is oppression, it is terrorism.

people are dying, living in terror, also prisoners on land because of the extremists, that is oppression, it is terrorism.

terrorism, is terrorism is terrorism it is not self defence it is terrorism.

try to escape from your indoctrinated propaganda your mind has been fed, challenge your own views before you shout them out.

best wishes
peace
dan

from another dan


gunship?

11.06.2003 10:00

So what was the rationale for using a helicopter mounted gun and blasting two bystanders in the explosion, rather than arresting the guy at one of the thousands of checkpoints?

Perhaps it wouldn't be terrorizing enough.

You got to wonder how they always know which car their assassination victim happens to be driving in. Does Israel have effective undercover spies, or do they get the information about where their victim is from the last checkpoint he passes through...

grotty


Is it hard to keep it up ?

11.06.2003 10:31

must be hard to keep this kind of propaganda going ?
especially as the cat is now firmly out of the bag ..
Obviously working on the old divide rool lines you can mix in the old left right bullshit. add a few comments from zionazi types and it's all loooking very familar.

I guess you aint got no scruples .....never had never will ..

nimrod


MORE ZIONIST LIES

11.06.2003 12:25

"If we are evacuated, we'll return the night after and establish 10 new outposts." - Settler spokesman Yehoshua Mor-Yosef[1]
In an effort to demonstrate compliance with the Road Map, the Israeli government has started to dismantle 15 of what it calls "unauthorized" settlement outposts in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.


1. THE DISMANTLEMENT IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH ISRAEL'S ROAD MAP OBLIGATIONS

Phase I of the Road Map requires that Israel "immediately dismantles settlement outposts erected since March 2001." The word "unauthorized" does not appear in the Road Map text and its unilateral insertion by Israel is intended to allow Israel to remove only those settlement outposts that it, in its sole discretion, deems "unauthorized". Peace Now estimates that there are 62 settlement outposts erected since March 2001. US officials estimate as many as 100 such outposts.[2]

There are more than 160 illegal settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, housing more than 400,000 settlers (nearly half of whom reside in Occupied East Jerusalem).


2. THE DISMANTLED OUTPOSTS ARE UNINHABITED "DUMMY" OUTPOSTS

Many of the outposts that are actually removed are in fact uninhabited or "dummy outposts" - empty outposts erected by the settler movement to use as a tool for negotiations or public relations. Only four of the 15 outposts Israel has slated for dismantlement are inhabited.[3] Former Israeli Knesset Member Zvi Hendel reaffirmed the use of "dummy outposts" in an interview on Settlers Radio Channel, "Arutz Sheva." He explained how settlers purchased caravans from the Jewish Agency and how other settlements contributed caravans for these dummy outposts.[4] Peace Now has confirmed this practice, affirming that all eleven outposts that were removed by PM Sharon under his former government were "dummy" outposts each consisting of no more than one or two uninhabited containers.[5]


3. THE CREATED CATEGORY OF "UNAUTHORIZED" SETTLEMENTS IS USED TO ACTUALLY FURTHER SETTLEMENT EXPANSION

Historically, Israeli governments have used the removal of "unauthorized" settlements to legitimize other settlements in a "trade-off" with settler groups. The Israeli government agrees to settler demands to authorize planned settlement expansion and to "authorize" some "unauthorized" outposts in exchange for settler agreement that some "unauthorized" outposts will be removed. For example, Prime Minister Barak's government, instead of dismantling 42 "unauthorized outposts", eventually agreed to "deal with" eleven, in exchange for authorizing the master plan for the Itimar settlement.[6] Of the eleven PM Barak "dealt with", four were uninhabited and four others were eventually authorized as "new neighborhoods" of nearby settlements.[7] Similarly, PM Sharon is expected to remove only a fraction of the outposts established after March 2001, while retroactively deeming the remainder "authorized".


4. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS "AUTHORIZED" SETTLEMENTS

All settlements are illegal under international law.

The Fourth Geneva Convention expressly prohibits an Occupying Power from deporting or transferring parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.[8] According to the Commentary of the Fourth Geneva Convention, the prohibition on the establishment of settlements is "intended to prevent a practice adopted during the Second World War by certain Powers, which transferred portions of their own population to occupied territory for political and racial reasons or in order, as they claimed, to colonize those territories. Such transfers worsened the economic situation of the native population and endangered their separate existence as a race."

In addition, Israeli settlements violate United Nations Security Council Resolutions, including UNSCR 452 (1979) calling upon "the Government and people of Israel to cease, on an urgent basis, the establishment, construction and planning of settlements in the Arab territories occupied since 1967, including Jerusalem." This resolution has never been enforced.


Endnotes

[1] Quoted in First Posts of Settlers Torn Down by Israelis, International Herald Tribune, June 10, 2003 at 6.

[2] Ibid., at 1.

[3] Nadav Shragai, IDF Dismantles 10 Outposts; Settlers Vow to Return, Ha'aretz Online, June 10, 2003

[4] MK Hendel says all illegal outposts evacuated 'were fabricated', Ha'aretz, July 18, 2002.

[5] Interview with Dror Etkes, Peace Now Settlement Watch Coordinator, June 10, 2003.

[6] Foundation for Middle East Peace (FMEP), Optical Illusion at Havat Ma'on, Report on Israeli Settlement in the Occupied Territories, volume 10, Jan.-Feb. 2000, www.fmep.org/reports/2000/v10n1.html

[7] Ibid.

[8] Article 49.

Angry Manc
mail e-mail: angry3manc@hotmail.com
- Homepage: http://electronicintifada.net/new.shtml